Swimming with ideas: what happens to creativity in the wake of a disaster and the waves of pro-social recovery behaviour that follow?

    Trudi CAMERON Affiliation
    ; Roy MONTGOMERY Affiliation
    ; Kevin MOORE Affiliation
    ; Emma STEWART Affiliation


Creativity that is driven by a need for physical or economic survival, which disasters are likely to inspire, raises the question of whether such creativity fits with conventional theories and perspectives of creativity. In this paper we use the opportunity afforded by the 2010–2013 Christchurch, New Zealand earthquakes to follow and assess the creative practices and responses of a number of groups and individuals. We use in-depth interviews to tease out motivations and read these against a range of theoretical propositions about creativity. In particular, we focus on the construct of “elite panic” and the degree to which this appeared to be evident in the Christchurch earthquakes context. Bureaucratic attempts to control or limit creativity were present but they did not produce a completely blanket dampening effect. Certain individuals and groups seemed to be pre-equipped to navigate or ignore potential blocks to creativity. We argue, using Geir Kaufmann’s novelty-creativity matrix and aspects of Teresa Amabile’s and Michael G. Pratt’s revised componential theory of creativity that a special form of disaster creativity does exist.


Kūrybiškumas, kurio priežastis yra fizinio ar ekonominio išgyvenimo poreikis ir kurį gali inspiruoti nelaimės, iškelia klausimą, ar taip suprantamas kūrybiškumas atitinka jam skirtas konvencines teorijas ir perspektyvas. Šiame straipsnyje atspirties tašku tampa 2010–2013 m. įvykę žemės drebėjimai Kraistčerče (Naujoji Zelandija). Stebime ir vertiname daugelio grupių ir individų kūrybines praktikas ir atsakus. Siekdami išsiaiškinti motyvus ir palyginti juos su daugeliu teorinių teiginių apie kūrybiškumą, naudojame išsamius interviu. Ypač daug dėmesio skiriame „elito panikos“ konceptui ir lygmeniui, ties kuriuo jis iškyla kaip akivaizdus Kraistčerčo žemės drebėjimų kontekste. Biurokratinės pastangos kontroliuoti ar riboti kūrybiškumą nesugebėjo jo visiškai nuslopinti. Tam tikri individai ir grupės, atrodė, buvo pasirengę atitinkama linkme kreipti ar nepaisyti galimų kūrybiškumui iškylančių kliūčių. Remdamiesi Geiro Kaufmanno naujumo ir kūrybiškumo matrica bei Teresos Amabile ir Michaelo G. Pratto pataisyta komponentine kūrybiškumo teorija, tvirtiname, kad yra ypatinga nelaimių sužadinama kūrybiškumo forma.

Reikšminiai žodžiai: Kraistčerčas, kūrybiškumas, nelaimės, žemės drebėjimai, elito panika, atsikūrimas.

Keyword : Christchurch, creativity, disasters, earthquakes, elite panic, resilience

How to Cite
CAMERON, T., MONTGOMERY, R., MOORE, K., & STEWART, E. (2018). Swimming with ideas: what happens to creativity in the wake of a disaster and the waves of pro-social recovery behaviour that follow?. Creativity Studies, 11(1), 10-23.
Mar 27, 2018
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-377.

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Amabile, T. M. (2000). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 22, pp. 123-167). New York: JAI Press.

Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3-15.

Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183.

Ardagh, M. W., Richardson, S. K., Robinson, V., Than, M., Gee, P., Henderson, S., Khodaverdi, L., McKie, J., Robertson, G., Schroeder, Ph. P., & Deely, J. M. (2012). The initial health-system response to the Earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, in February, 2011. The Lancet, 379(9831), 2109-2115.

Bergman, J. (2014). After Earthquakes, a Creative Rebirth in Christchurch. Retrieved from

Briskman, L. (1980). Creative product and creative process in science and art. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 23(1), 83-106.

Chang, S. E., Taylor, J. E., Elwood, K. J., Seville, E., Brunsdon, D., & Gartner, M. (2014). Urban disaster recovery in Christchurch: The Central Business District Cordon and other critical decisions. Earthquake Spectra: The Professional Journal of the Earthquake Research Institute, 30(1), 513-532.

Clarke, L,. & Chess, C. (2008). Elites and Panic: More to Fear than Fear Itself. Social Forces, 87(2), 993-1014.

Cretney, R., & Bond, S. (2014). “Bouncing Back” to capitalism? Grass-roots autonomous activism in shaping discourses of resilience and transformation following disaster. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 2(1), 18-31.

Cubrinovski, M., Robinson, K., Taylor, M., Hughes, M., & Orense, R. (2012). Lateral spreading and its impacts in urban areas in the 2010–2011 Christchurch Earthquakes. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 55(3), 255-269.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185.

Drury, A. C., & Olson, R. S. (1998). Disasters and political unrest: an empirical investigation. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6(3), 153-161.

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309.

Fritz, Ch. E. (1996). Disasters and mental health: therapeutic principles drawn from disaster studies. Series: Historical and comparative disaster series. Vol. 10. Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center.

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598.

Kaufmann, G. (2003). What to measure? A new look at the concept of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 235-251.

Kendra, J. M., & Wachtendorf, T. (2003). Elements of resilience after the World Trade Center Disaster: Reconstituting New York City’s Emergency Operations Centre. Disasters, 27(1), 37-53.

Killick, D. (2015). Innovative buildings part of quiet revolution. Retrieved from

Lee, A. V., Vargo, J., & Seville, E. (2013). Developing a tool to measure and compare organizations’ resilience. Natural Hazards Review, 14(1), 29-41.

Mamula-Seadon, L., Selway, K., & Paton, D. (2012). Exploring resilience: learning from Christchurch communities. Tephra, 23, 5-7.

Masten, A. S., & Powell, J. L. (2003). A resilience framework for research, policy, and practice. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 1–25).

Metzl, E. S. (2007). Exploration of creativity and resiliency in survivors of Hurricane Katrina. Florida State University Libraries: Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations. Retrieved from

Metzl, E. S. (2009). The role of creative thinking in resilience after Hurricane Katrina. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 112-123.

Metzl, E. S., & Morrell, M. A. (2008). The role of creativity in models of resilience: Theoretical exploration and practical applications. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 3(3), 303-318.

Revington, M. (2013). Who is really rebuilding Christchurch?. Retrieved from

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96.

Solnit, R. (2010). A Paradise Built in Hell: The extraordinary communities that arise in disaster. New York: Penguin Books.

Tierney, K. (2009). Disaster response: research findings and their implications for resilience measures. CARRI Research Report 6. Retrieved from

Wright, M. (2016). 2017: When Christchurch finally goes from recovery to rebuild. Retrieved from

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel