##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 18, 2018
Žilvinas GRAIBUS Vadim MOKŠIN

Abstract

This study compares the dimension measurements results obtained for two parts that had convex and concave parabolic profiles. Three different measurement systems were employed for measurements: coordinate measuring machine (CMM), 3D laser and 3D photometric scanners. It was found using Student’s t – test that results obtained by CMM measuring system are statistically significantly (p < 0.001) more accurate than results obtained by means of 3D laser and 3D photometric scanners. It was also established that results obtained by means of 3D laser scanning system are statistically significantly more accurate (p < 0.05) than those obtained by means of 3D photometric scanning system.


Santrauka


Straipsnyje lyginami dviejų detalių matmenų matavimų rezultatai, gauti skirtingomis matavimo sistemomis: koordinatine matavimo mašina (KMM), 3D lazeriniu skeneriu ir 3D fotometriniu skeneriu. Buvo matuojamos iškilaus ir įgaubto paraboloidinio profilio detalės. Išanalizavus matavimo rezultatus gauta, kad KMM matavimo sistema gauti rezultatai pagal Stjudento t kriterijų (t-test) statistiškai reikšmingai (p < 0,001) tikslesni už rezultatus, gautus 3D lazeriniu ir fotometriniu skeneriais. Taip pat nustatyta, kad rezultatai, gauti 3D lazerine skenavimo sistema, yra statistiškai reikšmingai tikslesni (p < 0,05) už gautuosius 3D fotometrinio skenavimo sistema.


Reikšminiai žodžiai: KMM, fotometrinis skeneris, lazerinis skeneris, 3D modelis.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

CMM, photometric scanner, laser scanner, 3D model

References
Cuypers, W.; Van Gestel, N.; Voet, A.; Kruth, J.-P.; Mingneau, J.; Bleys, P. 2009. Optical measurement techniques for mobile and large-scale dimensional metrology, Optics and Lasers Engineering 47(3–4): 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.03.013

DEA Global Silver [interaktyvus]. 2015 [žiūrėta 2017 m. balandžio 27 d.]. Prieiga per internetą: http://metrology.precizika.lt/uploads/Downloads/DEA%20GLOBAL%20Silver.pdf#page=1&zo-om=auto,-103,848

de Aquino Silva, J. B.; Burdekin, M. 2002. A modular space frame for assessing the performance of co-ordinate measuring machines (CMMs), Precision Engineering 26(1): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141–6359(01)00096–4

ElMaraghy, H.; Yang, X. 2003. Computer – aided planing of laser scanning of complex geometries, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 52(1): 411–414.

Galantucci, L. M.; Pesce, M.; Lavecchia, F. 2015. A stereo photogrammetry scanning methodology, for precise and accurate 3D digitization of small parts with sub-millimeter sized features, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 64(1): 507–510.

Gapinski, B.; Wieczorowski, M.; Marciniak-Podsadna, L.; Dybala, B.; Ziolkowski, G. 2014. Comparison of different method of measurement geometry using CMM, optical scanner and computed tomography 3D, Procedia Engineering 69: 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.230

MetraScan 3D [interaktyvus]. 2016 [žiūrėta 2017 m. balandžio 17 d.]. Prieiga per internetą: https://www.ems-usa.com/pdf/NEW_MetraSCAN3D_HandyPROBE_Leaflet_EN_EMEA_13042016.pdf

Probe heads [interaktyvus]. 2015 [žiūrėta 2017 m. balandžio 27 d.]. Prieiga per internetą: http://metrology.precizika.lt/uploads/Downloads/Probe%20Heads.pdf

Space Spider booklet [interaktyvus]. 2015 [žiūrėta 2017 m. balandžio 17 d.]. Prieiga per internetą: https://www.artec3d.com/files/pdf/Space-Spider-Booklet-EURO.pdf

Uekita, M.; Takaya, Y. 2016. On-machine dimensional measurement of large parts by compensating for volumetric errors of machine tools, Precision Engineering 43: 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2015.07.009
Section
Articles