Share:


An airspace analysis according to area navigation requirements

Abstract

Aircraft navigation within controlled airspace is carried out using on-board positioning systems capable to determine the coordinates of aircraft location with the system performance that meet navigation specifications requirements. The article proposes a descriptive set theory use to navigational aids network analysis in order to determine the positioning performance of the navigation system at predefined airspace volume. The uniqueness of the study is shape evaluation of areas that correspond to navigation specifications requirements and area research of different positioning techniques based on navigational aids such as DME/DME, VOR/DME, and VOR/VOR. An analysis of Ukrainian airspace has been done as an example.

Keyword : navigation, RNAV, PBN, navigational aids, performance, area, air space, aircraft, DME, VOR

How to Cite
Ostroumov, I., Kharchenko, V., & Kuzmenko, N. (2019). An airspace analysis according to area navigation requirements. Aviation, 23(2), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2019.10302
Published in Issue
May 27, 2019
Abstract Views
1648
PDF Downloads
885
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

AIP (2017). Aeronautical Information Publication of Ukraine. Ukrainian State Air Traffic Services Enterprise.

Dabbakuti, J. R., Ratnam, D. V., & Sunda, S. (2016). Modeling of ionospheric time delays based on adjusted spherical harmonic analysis. Aviation, 20(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3846/16487788.2016.1162197

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2006). Aeronautical telecommunications. Radio navigation aids (Annex 10, Vol. 1). International Standards and Recommended Practices. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada.

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2008a). Unified framework for collision risk modeling in support of the manual on airspace planning methodology with further applications, (CIR 319, AN/181 ed.). International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada.

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2008b). Performance-based navigation (PBN) manual (Doc 9613 AN/937). International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal, Canada.

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2012). Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) manual (Doc 9849, AN/457). International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada.

Eurocontrol. (2008). Guidelines for PRNAV Infrastructure Assessment (GUID-114, 1.2 ed.).

Federal Aviation Administrations. (1982). AC 00-31A – U.S National aviation standard for very high frequency omnidirectional radio range (VOR)/ distance measuring equipment (DME) / tactical air navigation (TACAN) systems. 67.

Federal Aviation Administrations. (2007). AC 90-100A – U.S Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations. 273.

Han, S., Gong, Z., Meng, W., Li, C., & Gu, X. (2016). Future alternative positioning, navigation, and timing techniques: A survey. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(6), 154-160. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2016.1500181RP

Kasperovych, N., Shvets, V., & Ostrovsky, Y. (2008). Noise modeling for global satellite aeronavigation systems. In 2008 Proceedings of Microwaves, Radar and Remote Sensing Symposium, MRRS 2008, (pp. 310-313). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRRS.2008.4669602

Kutsenko, O., Ilnytska, S., & Konin, V. (2018). Investigation of the residual tropospheric error influence on the coordinate determination accuracy in a satellite landing system. Aviation, 22(4), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2018.7082

Kuzmenko, N. S., Ostroumov, I. V., & Marais, K. (2018). An accuracy and availability estimation of aircraft positioning by navigational aids. In 2018 Proceedings of Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control, MSNMC 2008, (pp. 36-40). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSNMC.2018.8576276

Lo, S., Enge, P., Niles, F., Loh, R., Eldredge, L., & Narins, M. (2010). Preliminary assessment of alternative navigation means for civil aviation. International Technical Meeting 2010, ITM 2010, 1, 484-492.

Lubbers, B., Mildner, S., Onincx, P., & Scheele, A. (2015). A study on the accuracy of GPS positioning during jamming. In 2015 International Association of Institutes of Navigation World Congress, IAIN 2015 – Proceedings. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAIN.2015.7352258

Muller, D., Uday, P., & Marais, K. B. (2011). Evaluation of the potential environmental benefits of RNAV/RNP arrival procedures. Paper presented at the 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Including the AIAA Balloon Systems Conference and 19th AIAA Lighterthan-Air Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-6932

Narins, M., Eldredge, L., Enge, P., Harrison, M., Kenagy, R., & Lo, S. (2012, April). Alternative position, navigation, and timing – The need for robust radionavigation. In Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Report of a Joint Workshop of the National Academy of Engineering and the Chinese Academy of Engineering (pp. 119-136). The National Academies Press.

Ostroumov, I. V., Kuzmenko, N. S., & Marais, K. (2018). Optimal pair of navigational aids selection. In 2018 Proceedings of Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control, MSNMC 2018 (pp. 32-35). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSNMC.2018.8576293

Vitan, V., Berz, G., Saini, L., Arethens, J., Belabbas, B., & Hotmar, P. (2018). Research on alternative positioning navigation and timing in Europe. In ICNS 2018 – Integrated Communications, Navigation, Surveillance Conference, (pp. 4D21-4D217). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2018.8384887