Motivation, learning strategies and performance among business undergraduates at university colleges in Sweden
Purpose – This paper brings new material to the understanding of interlinkages between motivation, learning and performance in academic contexts. By investigating these interlinkages in a new context – students of business and management at a Swedish university college – it seeks to answer the following research questions: How do students’ degree and type of motivation relate to their learning strategies?; how do students’ degree and type of motivation and learning strategies relate to their academic success?; and how do student characteristics in terms of experience and gender influence the nature and strength of these relationships?
Research methodology – The data used in this paper is based on student surveys and a centralised system of reporting and archiving academic results. The latter contains information on the academic performance of individual students, whereas the surveys gathered information on the students’ background characteristics (experience and gender), their motivation for pursuing academic studies and their learning strategies. The difference in proportion tests and OLS regressions were then applied to investigate differences between student groups and relationships between the different variables.
Findings – The findings reveal that business students are more extrinsically than intrinsically motivated; that deep learning approaches lead to higher grades for particular examination forms, and that female students are typically more intrinsically motivated, engage more in deep learning approaches and perform better than their male counterparts.
Practical implications – The findings suggest that practitioners in higher education involved with the business and/or university college students have good reasons to stimulate motivation generally, and intrinsic motivation in particular. However, this must be accompanied by examination forms that promote deep learning.
Originality/Value – In contrast to most research, this paper focuses on the interlinkages between motivation, learning and performance among business students in a university college setting. This contrasts most research on this topic which tends to be focused on university students, particularly in the US, in other fields of study or accounting. Moreover, this paper also takes student characteristics into account and uses a variety of measures to operationalise academic performance.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abhayawansa, S., Tempone, I., & Pillay, S. (2012). Impact of entry mode on students’ approaches to learning: A study of accounting students. Accounting Education, 21(4), 341-361.
Alanzi, K. A., & Alfraih, M. M. (2017). Does accumulated knowledge impact academic performance in cost accounting? Journal of International Education in Business, 10(1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-08-2016-0019
Ariani, D. (2016). Why do I study? The mediating effect of motivation and self-regulation on student performance. Business, Management and Education, 14(2), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2016.329
Arquero, J. L., Fernández-Polvillo, C., Hassall, T., & Joyce, J. (2015). Vocation, motivation and approaches to learning: a comparative study. Education + Training, 57(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2013-0014
Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6
Bartlett, S., Peel, M. J., & Pendlebury, M. (1993). From fresher to finalist: a three-year analysis of student performance on an accounting degree programme. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 2(2), 111-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639289300000013
Bennett, R. 2003. Determinants of undergraduate student drop out rates in a university business studies department, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/030987703200065154
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. research monograph. Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd., Radford House, Frederick St., Hawthorn 3122, Australia.
Biggs, J. B. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. McGraw-Hill Education.
Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433
Bowl, M.; Bathmaker, A.-M. (2016). Non-traditional’ students and diversity in higher education. In Routledge Handbook of the Sociology of Higher Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772233-13
Buckless, F. A., Lipe, M. G., & Ravenscroft, S. P. (1991). Do gender effects on accounting course performance persist after controlling for general academic aptitude. Issues in Accounting Education, 6(2), 248-261.
Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2008). Examining the relationships among background variables and academic performance of first year accounting students at an Irish University. Journal of Accounting Education, 26(4), 202-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2009.02.001
Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education, 11(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280210153254
Chan, Y. K. (2016). Investigating the relationship among extracurricular activities, learning approach and academic outcomes: A case study. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654795
Crawford, I., & Wang, Z. (2015). The impact of individual factors on the academic attainment of Chinese and UK students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(5), 902-920. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.851182
Davidson, R. A. (2003). Relationship of study approach and exam performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 20(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-5751(01)00025-2
Davidson, R. A., Gelardi, A. M., & Hart, S. D. (1996). Factors affecting the use of the Canadian Uniform Final Examination as a means of assessing CA candidates. Accounting Education, 5(2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639289600000017
Debnath, S. C., Tandon, S., & Pointer, L. V. (2007). Designing business school courses to promote student motivation: An application of the job characteristics model. Journal of Management Education, 31(6), 812-831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562906290914
Deci, E. L. 1975. Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy. In Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31-49). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1280-0_3
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
DeMarie, D., & Aloise-Young, P. A. (2003). College students’ interest in their major. College Student Journal, 37(3), 462-470.
Diseth, A.; Kobbeltvedt, T. (2010). A mediation analysis of achievement motives, goals, learning strategies, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 671-687. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X492432
Dockweiler, R. C., & Willis, C. G. (1984). On the use of entry requirements for undergraduate accounting programs. Accounting Review, 4, 496-504.
Dong, N., Bai, M., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. (2019). Approaches to learning IFRS by Chinese accounting students. Journal of Accounting Education, 48, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2019.04.002
Doran, B. M., Bouillon, M. L., & Smith, C. G. (1991). Determinants of student performance in accounting principles I and II. Issues in Accounting Education, 6(1), 74-84.
Duff, A. (2004). Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: the role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement. Accounting Education, 13(4), 409-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928042000306800
Duff, A. (1999). Access policy and approaches to learning. Accounting Education, 8(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/096392899330955
Duff, A., & McKinstry, S. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(2), 183-214. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2007.22.2.183
Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, learning approaches, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 549-563. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.119
Eppler, M. A., & Harju, B. L. (1997). Achievement motivation goals in relation to academic performance in traditional and nontraditional college students. Research in Higher Education, 38(5), 557-573. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024944429347
European Commission (2013). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions European higher education in the world COM/2013/0499 final.
Everaert, P., Opdecam, E., & Maussen, S. (2017). The relationship between motivation, learning approaches, academic performance and time spent. Accounting Education, 26(1), 78-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1274911
Fryer, L., & Ginns, P. (2018). A reciprocal test of perceptions of teaching quality and approaches to learning: A longitudinal examination of teaching-learning connections. Educational Psychology, 38(8), 1032-1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1403568
Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., & Papworth, B. (2018). Student learning in Australian high schools: Contrasting personological and contextual variables in a longitudinal structural model. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.03.007
Gist, W. E., Goedde, H., & Ward, B. H. (1996). The influence of mathematical skills and other factors on minority student performance in principles of accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 11(1), 49.
Gledhill, R. F., & Van der Merwe, C. (1989). Gender as a factor in student learning: Preliminary findings. Medical Education, 23(2), 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1989.tb00887.x
Hall, M., Ramsay, A., & Raven, J. (2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education, 13(4), 489-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928042000306837
Hassall, T., & Joyce, J. (1997). What do examinations of professional bodies reward? Some preliminary findings. In G. Gibbs & C. Rust (eds.), Improving student learning through course design (pp. 431-438). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Herath, T. C. (2015). Student learning and performance in information systems courses: The role of academic motivation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(4), 583-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12080
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223006
Koh, M. Y., & Koh, H. C. (1999). The determinants of performance in an accountancy degree programme. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 8(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/096392899331017
Kusurkar, R. A., Ten Cate, T. J., Vos, C. M. P., Westers, P., & Croiset, G. (2013). How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3
Kyndt, E., Donche, V., Trigwell, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2017). Higher education transitions: theory and research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617367
Lange, P. D., & Mavondo, F. (2004). Gender and motivational differences in approaches to learning by a cohort of open learning students. Accounting Education, 13(4), 431-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928042000306765
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.168
Lipe, M. G. (1989). Further evidence on the performance of female versus male accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 4(1), 2-44.
Lucas, U., & Meyer, J. H. (2005). “Towards a mapping of the student world”: the identification of variation in students’ conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 177-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2004.10.002
McEvoy, G. M. (2011). Increasing intrinsic motivation to learn in organizational behavior classes. Journal of Management Education, 35(4), 468-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562911408098
Mo, S. (2011). An exploratory study of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators and student performance in an auditing course. American Journal of Business Education, 4(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v4i2.3558
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
Postareff, L., Mattsson, M., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Hailikari, T. (2017). The complex relationship between emotions, approaches to learning, study success and study progress during the transition to university. Higher Education, 73(3), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0096-7
Rassuli, A. (2012). Engagement in classroom learning: creating temporal participation incentives for extrinsically motivated students through bonus credits. Journal of Education for Business, 87(2), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.570808
Richardson, J. T. (1993). Gender differences in responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory. Studies in Higher Education, 18(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079312331382418
Richardson, J. T. (2017). Student learning in higher education: a commentary. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9410-x
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Sadler‐Smith, E. (1996). Approaches to studying: Age, gender and academic performance. Educational Studies, 22(3), 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569960220306
Sakurai, Y., Parpala, A., Pyhältö, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2016). Engagement in learning: A comparison between Asian and European international university students. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(1), 24-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.866837
Severiens, S. E., & Ten Dam, G. T. (1994). Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education, 27(4), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384906
Sithole, S. T. (2018). Instructional strategies and students’ performance in accounting: an evaluation of those strategies and the role of gender. Accounting Education, 27(6), 613-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2017.1361852
Smyth, L., Mavor, K. I., & Platow, M. J. (2017). Learning behaviour and learning outcomes: the roles for social influence and field of study. Social Psychology of Education, 20(1), 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9365-7
Sun, H., & Richardson, J. T. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the academic environment and approaches to studying in British postgraduate business education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 384-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1017755
Tang, C. (1994). Effects of modes of assessment on students’ preparation strategies. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning – theory and practice (pp. 151-170). Oxford: Oxford City Centre for Staff Development.
Tasgin, A., & Coskun, G. Ă. (2018). The relationship between academic motivations and university students’ attitudes towards learning. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 935-950. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11459a
Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002
Teixeira, C., & Gomes, D. (2017). Insights into learning profiles and learning outcomes within introductory accounting. Accounting Education, 26(5-6), 522-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1221767
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132290
Turner, E. A., Chandler, M., & Heffer, R. W. (2009). The influence of parenting styles, achievement motivation, and self-efficacy on academic performance in college students. Journal of College Student Development, 50(3), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0073
Tyson, H., & Woodward, A. (1989). Why students aren’t learning very much from textbooks. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 14-17.
UHR. (2016). Kan excellens uppnås i homogena studentgrupper? Universitets- och högskolerådet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C. B., & Vallières, E. F. (1993). Academic Motivation Scale (AMS-C 28) College (CEGEP) version. Educational Psychology Measurement, 52, 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124
Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06126.96.36.1998
Vanthournout, G., Gijbels, D., Coertjens, L., Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Students’ persistence and academic success in a first-year professional bachelor program: The influence of students’ learning strategies and academic motivation. Education Research International, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/152747
Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (1985). A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 4(2), 127-141.
Weber, K., & Patterson, B. R. (2000). Student interest, empowerment and motivation. Communication Research Reports, 17(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090009388747
Williams, G. C., Hedberg, V. A., Cox, E. M., & Deci, E. L. 2000. Extrinsic life goals and health‐risk behaviors in adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1756-1771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02466.x
Wilson, K. L., Smart, R. M., & Watson, R. J. (1996). Gender differences in approaches to learning in first year psychology students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01176.x
Wynn-Williams, K., Beatson, N., & Anderson, C. (2016). The impact of unstructured case studies on surface learners: A study of second-year accounting students. Accounting Education, 25(3), 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1165125
Yu, S., Zhang, F., Nunes, L. D., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2018). Self-determined motivation to choose college majors, its antecedents, and outcomes: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108, 132-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.07.002