Share:


Relationship between university education in strategic management and chess in a both learning process: an approach across learning paths

    Justo De Jorge-Moreno   Affiliation

Abstract

Purpose – In this work, a reflexive experiential learning process is collected, which relates concepts the strategic management and learning the game of chess in a flipped classroom and blending learning process for the 2017/18 and 2018/19 courses.


Research methodology – The method followed has been the initial approach of the learning curves and the time series of the analysis of learning patterns in the game of chess. Also, for the study of the relationship between the game of chess and its analogy with strategic management, we used a questionnaire, and we apply cluster and network analysis.


Findings – The main results reveal the existence of different learning patterns (linear, quadratic, random walk), associated with the various skills of the students. Likewise, different learning groups have been identified concerning the times and learning levels by activities. The underlying idea is the motivation that the game of chess exerts on students to foster greater understanding.


Research limitations – The limitations are related to the size of the classroom and the different initial levels of chess knowledge, which have been a real challenge to carry out this work. Finally, the combination of activities, between chess and strategic management knowledge is complicated to handle, requiring large doses of planning. These limitations are perhaps challenging to solve, although possible help could be associated with more teachers being involved in the process.


Practical implications – The simultaneous learning of chess with the consequent increase of cognitive skills and Strategic Management concepts could intensify the motivation of the student and generate a virtuous circle that drives both areas.


Originality/Value – This new experience in Spain contributes to filling a perhaps significant gap in the literature. In parallel, the practice of chess in the classroom has corroborated a level of commitment and motivation of students in the knowledge of the concepts of strategic management. The results achieved could suggest the incorporation of chess practice as a motivating factor in management subjects.

Keyword : chess, strategic management, individual differences, learning path, university education

How to Cite
De Jorge-Moreno, J. (2020). Relationship between university education in strategic management and chess in a both learning process: an approach across learning paths. Business, Management and Education, 18(2), 226-246. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2020.12369
Published in Issue
Jul 20, 2020
Abstract Views
67
PDF Downloads
38
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3(2), 111–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1971.10734898

Artero Escartin, I., & Domeneque Claver, N. (2018). Dar la vuelta a la enseñanza. Una experiencia de Flipped Classroom en Economía Publica. E-publica. Revista electrónica sobre la enseñanza de la Economía Pública, 22, 51–75.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education, Washington, DC.

Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1973). Some comments on a paper by Chatfield and Prothero and on a review by Kendall. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 136(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/2344995

Cannice, M. V. (2013). The right moves: creating experiential management learning with chess. The International Journal of Management Education, 11, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.11.002

Dominguez, A., Saenz De Navarrete, J., De Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martinez Herraiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning expeiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020

Farashahi, M., & Tajeddin, M. (2018). Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations. The International Journal of Management Education, 16, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.003

Fernández-Mesa, A., Olmo-Peñuela, J., & Alegre, J. (2016). Valor pedagógico del repositorio común de conocimientos para cursos de dirección de empresas. @tic revista d´innovació educativa, 16, 39–47.

González Fernández, M. O., & Huerta Gaytán, P. (2019). Experiencia del aula invertida para promover estudiantes prosumidores del nivel superior. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(2) (version preprint). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.23065

Graber, R. S. (2009). Business lessons from chess: A discussion of parallels between chess strategy and business strategy, and how chess can have applications for business education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 13(1), 79–85.

Grosse, E. H., Glock, C. H., & Müller, S. (2015). Production economics and the learning curve: A metaanalysis. International Journal Production Economic, 170, 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.021

Guerras Martín, L. A. & Navas López, J. E. (2007). La dirección estratégica de la empresa. Teoría y aplicaciones. Thomson Reuters Civitas.

Johnson, A., & Proctor, R. W. (2017). Skill acquisition & training. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315531656

Hedberg, P. R. (2009). Learning through reflective classroom practice. Journal of Management Education, 33(1), 10–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562908316714

Howard, R. W. (2014). Learning curves in highly skilled chess players: A test of the generality of the power law of practice. Acta Psychologica, 151, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.013

Kazemi, F., Yektayar, M., & Abad, M. B. (2012). Investigation the impact of chess plays on developing meta-cognitive ability and math problem-solving power of students at different levels of education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.056

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. PrenticeHall.

Lage, M., Platt, G., & Treglia, T. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759

Milat, M. (1997). The role of chess in modern education. http://chessedu.org/wp-content/uploads/Role_Chess_Education.pdf

Minocha, S., Reynolds, M., & Hristov, D. (2017). Developing imaginators not managers – How to flip the business school model. The International Journal of Management Education, 15, 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.08.002

Osgerby, J., Jennings, P., & Bonathan, P. (2018). Do students see the benefits? An exploratory study of undergraduate accounting students’ perceptions of a programme focussed assessment. The International Journal of Management Education, 16, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.04.006

Talbert, R. (2012). Inverted classroom. Colleagues, 9(1). http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/colleagues/vol9/iss1/7

VanSchenkhof, M., Houseworth, M., McCord, M., & Lannin, J. (2018). Peer evaluations within experiential pedagogy: Fairness, objectivity, retaliation safeguarding, constructive feedback, and experiential learning as part of peer assessment. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.003

Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2282967

Wright, T. P. (1936). Factors affecting the cost airplanes. Journal Aeronautics Science, 3(4), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.155