Share:


Six smartness dimensions in cultural management: social/cultural environment perspective

    Audronė Pauliukevičiūtė Affiliation
    ; Robertas Jucevičius Affiliation

Abstract

Cultural management as a complex process is constantly facing social/cultural challenges (policy shifts, creativity, interest coherence, the rise of technological capital, cultural emigration, etc.) that affect the growing need and importance for smartness in management. There is a lack of inter-disciplinary research on smartness in the context of cultural management. The goal of this article is to ground smartness dimensions in cultural management in the context of changing the social/cultural environment. Strategy, Creative Development, Harmonization of Interests in the Cultural Sector, Empowered Cultural Sector Parties, Harmony of Intellectual and Technological Capital as well as the Culture of Shared Value Creation are presented in this article as six smartness dimensions in cultural management (the management of cultural sector and the cultural policy implementation at the state level). The object of the work – smartness dimensions in cultural management. Principal objectives: critically analyse a variety of concepts of cultural management; reveal the importance of smartness in cultural management in the context of changing social/cultural environment; explore the characteristics of smartness dimensions in cultural management. Methods employed: critical literature analysis and meta-analysis. Research conducted by authors of this article allowed to ground smartness dimensions as factors, possibly determining a more successful cultural management.

Keyword : smartness dimensions, cultural management, cultural sector

How to Cite
Pauliukevičiūtė, A., & Jucevičius, R. (2018). Six smartness dimensions in cultural management: social/cultural environment perspective. Business, Management and Education, 16, 108-120. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2018.2144
Published in Issue
Jul 13, 2018
Abstract Views
116
PDF Downloads
63
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Albert, S. R., & Fetzer, R. C. (2005). Smart community networks: self-directed team effectiveness in action. Team Performance Management, 11(5), 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590510617738

Alperytė, I. (2010, May). Managing cultural differences in business: identity versus otherness. Global Business Management, Selected papers (pp. 67-75). FH Oberösterreich, University of Applied Sciences. Aachen: Shaker.

Baltrėnas, P., Baltrėnaitė, E., & Kačerauskas, T. (2015). Social environment of creativity. Filosofija. Sociologija, 26(1), 46-54. Vilnius: Lietuvos Mokslų Akademijos leidykla.

Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165-182. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3703_3

Bovaird, T., & Loffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public governance: indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69, 313-328.0 https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693002

Bučinskas, A., Raipa, A., & Pauliukevičiūtė, A. (2010). Modern aspects of implementation of cultural policy. Bridges, 4, 1-14.

Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: understanding complex systems (156 p.). London, New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-203-01225-9.

Cray, D., & Inglis, L. (2011). Strategic decision making in arts organizations. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 41(2), 84-102. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2011.573444

Dewey, P. (2008). Transnational cultural policymaking in the European Union. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 38(2), 99-120. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.3200/JAML.38.2.99-120

Donskis, L. (2009). Moderniosios kultūros filosofijos metmenys (216 p.). Vilnius: mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla. ISBN: 9789955341673

Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2014). Governments for the future: building the strategic and agile state (52 p.). Helsinki: Erweko, Sintra Studies Publications. ISBN 978-951-563-889-2.

Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life (434 p.). New York: Basic Books. ISBN-10: 04 650 24777.

Grodach, C. (2016). Mapping the arts: industry concentrations, distribution, and change in the US, 1980–2010. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(3), 353-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2014.987667

Hay, S., & Kapitzke, C. (2009). Smart state for a knowledge economy: Reconstituting creativity through student subjectivity. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690802700206

Hesmondhalgh, D., & Pratt, A. C. (2005). Cultural industries and cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630500067598

Johnson, N. F. (2009). Simply complexity: a clear guide to complexity theory (256 p.). Oxford: Oneworld Publications. ISBN-10: 1851686304.

Jucevičienė, P., & Jucevičius R. (2014, May). What does it mean to be smart?. Proceedings of the 8th Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2014” (pp. 911-918). Vilnius, Lithuania: selected papers. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Riga Technical University, Tallinn University of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Cracow University of Economics. Vilnius: Technika.

Jucevičius, R. (2014). Sumaniojo miesto vystymo strateginės dimensijos. Viešoji politika ir administravimas [Public policy and administration], 13(3), 427-441.

Jucevičius, R., & Jucevičienė, P. (2017). Sumaniosios socialinės sistemos koncepcija. Iš R. Jucevičius, ir J. Šiugždinienė (Ed.), Sumanioji socialinė Sistema (pp. 12-34). Kaunas: Technologija. https://doi.org/10.5755/e01.9786090213773

Jucevičius, R., & Pauliukevičiūtė A. (2017). Sumanumo dimensijų raiškos kultūros vadyboje teorinės prielaidos. Iš R. Jucevičius ir J. Šiugždinienė (Ed.), Sumanioji socialinė Sistema (pp. 193-226). Kaunas: Technologija. https://doi.org/10.5755/e01.9786090213773

Kairaitis, Z. (2013). Vieta, kalba, kultūra kaip švietimo erdvės apibrėžtys. Logos, 74, 172-182.

Kangas, A. (2008). Nauji kultūros politikos drabužiai. Kultūros politika (pp. 39-64). Straipsnių rinktinė. Žaidytė G. (Ed.). Baltos lankos.

Lee, H. K. (2016). Politics of the ‘creative industries’ discourse and its variants. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(3), 438-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2014.991783

Liutkus, V. (2010). Compendium cultural trends in Europe. Country Profile Lithuania. Council of Europe/ERICarts: „Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends in Europe“ (12th ed.).

Manzaneque, M., Ramírez, Y., & Diéguez-Soto, J. (2017). Intellectual capital efficiency, technological innovation and family management. Innovation, 19(2), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1272828

Martin, S. (2009). Engaging with citizens and stakeholders. In T. Bovaird, E. Loeffler (Ed.), Public Management and Governance (pp. 279-297). London: Routledge.

Mcnabb, D. (2009). The new face of government. How public managers are forging a new approach to governance (280 p.). New York: CRC Press. ISBN-9781-4200-9387-2. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420093889

Melnikas, B. (2015). Innovation strategies for the European Union. Viešasis Administravimas [Public Administration] 1(45)-2(46), 67-77.

Melnikas, B. (2014). Culture and technological progress in the context of European integration: new challenges. Economics and Culture = Ekonomika un Kultūra, 9, 57-76. Riga: The University College of Economics and Culture.

Mercer, C. (2005). From indicators to governance to the mainstream tools for cultural policy and citizenship. In C. Andrew, M. Gattinger, M. S. Jeannotte, W. Straw (Ed.), Accounting for culture: thinking through cultural citizenship (pp. 9-21). Ottawa: The University of Ottawa Press.

Mulcahy, K. V. (2006). Cultural policy: definitions and theoretical approaches. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 35(4), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.3200/JAML.35.4.319-330

Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance?. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022

Pauliukevičiūtė, A. (2011). Regional cultural policy changes in the context of new public governance: developing a creative economy in Lithuania. Social Research [Socialiniai Tyrimai], 3(24), 89-99.

Pauliukevičiūtė, A., & Jucevičius, R. (2016). Strategiškumo kaip sumanumo dimensijos kultūros vadyboje vertinimas. Viešoji Politika ir Administravimas [Public Policy and Administration], 15(3), 375-389.

Pauliukevičiūtė, A., & Raipa, A. (2011). Cultural personnel governance in the stage of globalisation. In R. Kattel, W. Mikulowski, & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Public administration in time of crisis (pp. 195-209). Bratislawa: NISPAcee.

Pauliukevičiūtė, A., & Raipa, A. (2012, May). Culture management key challenges in changing economic environment. The 7th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2012” (pp. 701-708). Selected papers. Vilnius, Lithuania. Vilnius: Gediminas Technical University.

Pauliukevičiūtė, A., & Raipa, A. (2014). Kultūros politikos įgyvendinimas: Teorinis konceptualizavimas ir modeliai. Viešoji Politika ir Administravimas [Public Policy and Administration], 13(2), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-14-13-2-05

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: a comparative analysis – new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (374 p.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN-10: 0199595097.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: creating shared value. Harvard Business Review 89(1/2), 62-77.

Pruskus, V. (2013). Kultūros samprata ir inkultūrizacijos procesas tarpkultūrinės komunikacijos kontekste. Filosofija. Sociologija, 24(3), 121-130.

Reimeris, R. (2016). Theoretical features of the creative society. Creativity studies, 9(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.3846/23450479.2015.1088902

Staniulytė, E. (2017). Kūrybinis miestas: nuo teorinės koncepcijos prie praktinio įgyvendinimo. Filosofija. Sociologija, 28(1), 84-88.

Street, B. V. (2018). Sir Edward Burnett Tylor. British Anthropologist. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.

Šlapkauskas, V. (2010). The inner tensions of legal culture in consumer society. Jurisprudence, 4(122), 371-385.

Štreimikienė, D. (2016). Lithuanian cultural policy: challenges and achievements. Journal of International Studies, 9(1), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/16

Thibodeau, B. D., & Rüling, Ch. C. (2015). Nonprofit organizations, community, and shared urgency: lessons from the arts and culture sector. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 45(3), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2015.1080640

Williams, R. (1977). Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society (286 p.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN- 01 952 04697.

Woronkowicz, J. (2018). Community engagement and cultural building projects. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 48(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2017.1366962