New approach to the technological aspect of corporate sustainable development
Enterprises that seek for sustainable development should align economic interests with environmental and social requirements. It is not enough to take into account just these basics components. Technology plays a significant role in company activity. The aim of this article is to highlight the relationship between the dimensions characterising sustainability and to take a deeper look at the structure of the concept of sustainability, so that to understand in more detail the completeness of the dimensions of sustainability. For achieving this aim is necessary through the analysis of researchers’ opinions to apply the logical assessment, systematisation, and comparison of information, selects the most important information describing the sustainability of technology, highlights the relationships between the technological aspect of sustainability and other sustainability dimensions, evaluates the technological processes of the corporate product in terms of sustainability, clarifies and presents arguments highlighting the importance of the technological aspect in sustainable business activity, rejects inappropriate arguments, identifies links between the arguments, and, basing on the information, proves and/or formulates anew some logical considerations to justify the full competency of the technological dimension in the sustainable development framework. Article proved that sustainable development contains the technological dimension which is added to the four classical dimensions and serves as an axis that determines the contents of other sustainability parts.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Barbien D (2013) What makes an enterprise sustainable? Nuremberg Information systems (University of Erlangen) 1: 38-46.
Baumgartner RJ, Rauter R (2017) Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. Journal of Cleaner Production 140 (1): 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.146
Bohnsack R, Kolk A (2014) Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy 43 (2): 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.014
Bleischwitz R (2003) Cognitive and institutional perspectives of eco-efficiently. Ecological Economics 46 (3): 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00186-1
Cheng Z, Li W (2018) Independent R and D, Technology introduction, and green growth in China’s manufacturing’. Sustainability 10: 3-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020311
Choo CW (2006) The Knowing organization. How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crosno, JL, Cui AP (2014) A multilevel analysis of the adoption of sustainable technology. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 22 (2): 209-222. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP10696679220213
Denton P (2014). Technology and sustainability. Toronto: Rocky Mountain Books.
Dobrovolskienė N, Tvaronavičienė M, Tamošiūnienė R (2017) Tackling projects on sustainability: a Lithuanian case study, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 4 (4): 477-488. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(6)
Dong B, Lam KP, Höynck M, Zhang R, Chiou Y-S, Benitez D (2010) An information technology enabled sustainability test-bed (ITEST) for occupancy detection through an environmental sensing network. Energy and Buildings 42 (7): 1038-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.016
Eschenfelder KR, Shankar K, Williams R, Lanham A, Salo D, Zhang M (2016) What we talking about when we talk about sustainability of digital archives, repositories and libraries?In: Proceedings of the 79th ASIST annual meeting: creating knowledge, nhancing lives Through information technology. Copenhagen, Denmark, October 14-18 (148): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301148
Foley A, Smyth BM, Pukšec T, Markovska N, Duić N (2017) A review of developments in technologies and research that have had a direct measurable impact on sustainability considering the Paris agreement on climate change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2): 835-839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.215
Fox SJ (2018) Policing – the technological revolution: opportunities and challenges! Technology in Society 56: 69-/7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.09.006
Hard M, Jamison A (2005) Hubris and hybrids; a cultural history of technology and science. New York: Routledge.
Hitomi K (2017) Manufacturing systems engineering. A unified approach to manufacturing technology, production management and industrial economics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203748145
Höjer M, Wangel J (2015) Smart sustainable cities: definition and challenges. In: Hilty LM & Aebischer B (Eds). ICT Innovations for sustainability advances in intelligent systems and computing. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_20
Kates RW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA (2012) What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, alues, and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 47 (3): 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444
Krintz C, Wolski R, Golubovic N, Lampel B, Kulkarni V, Sethuramasamyraja B, Roberts B, Liu B (2016) Smart farm: improving agriculture sustainability using modern information technology. In: Proceedings of KDD Workshop on Data Science for Food, Energy, and Water https://sites.google.com/site/2016dsfew/home
Kuo-Jui W, Ching-Jong L, Ming-Lang T, Ming KL, Jiayao H, Kimhua T (2017) Toward sustainability: using big data to explore the decisive attributes of supply chain risks and uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production 142 (2): 663-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.040
Lee MH, Yun JH, Pyka A, Won DK, Kodama F, Schiuma G, Park HS, Jeon J, Park KZ, Jung K, Yan M-R, Lee SY, Zhao X (2018) How to respond to the Fourth industrial revolution, or the Second Information Technology revolution? Dynamic New combinations between technology, market, and society through open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 4 (3): 21-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4030021
Ma D, Ullah F, Khattak MS, Anwar M (2018 ) Do international capabilities and resources configure firm’s sustainable competitive performance? Research within Pakistani SMEs. Sustainability 10: 82-98. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114298
Manariotis I, Yannopoulos P (2004) Adverse Effects on Alfeios river basin and an integrated management framework based on sustainability. Environmental Management 34: 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0069-y
Melnikas B (2010) Sustainable development and creation of knowledge economy: the new theoretical approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16 (3): 516-540. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.32
Morrison-Saunders A, Fischer TB (2009) What is wrong with EIA and SEA anyway? A sceptic’s perspective of sustainability assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 08 (1): 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814289696_0011
Paul ID, Bholeb GP, Chaudharic JR (2014) A review on Green manufacturing: it’s important. Methodology and its Application. Procedia Materials Science 6: 1644-1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.149
Porter M, Kramer MR (2011) The big idea: creating shared value. Harvard Business Review 89 (1/2): 62-77.
Robinson WG, Chan PW, Lau T (2016) Sensors and sensibility: examining the role of technological features in servitizing construction towards greater sustainability. Construction Management and Economics 34 (1): 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1139146
Sammalisto K, Sundström A, Holm T (2015) Implementation of sustainability in universities as perceived by faculty and staff – a model from a Swedish universities. Journal of Cleaner Production 106: 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.015
Schulte J, Hallstedt SI (2018) Self-Assessment method for sustainability implementation in product innovation. Sustainability 10: 12-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124336
Schwab K (2017) The Fourth industrial revolution New York: Crown Business.
Seghezzo L (2009) The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics 18 (4): 539-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903063669
Spangenberg JH, Lorek S (2002) Environmentally sustainable household consumption: from aggregate environmental pressures to priority fields of action. Ecological Economics 43: 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00212-4
Tetsman I, Bazienė K, Viselga G (2017) Technologies for sustainable circular business: using crushing device for used tires. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 4 (4): 432-440. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(3)
Vegera S, Malei A, Sapeha I, Sushko V (2018) Information support of the circular economy: the objects of accounting at recycling technologicfigureal cycle stages of industrial waste. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 6 (1): 190-210. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(13)
Vergragt PV (2006) How technology could contribute to a sustainable World. Boston: Tellus institute.
Witjes S, Lozano R (2016) Towards a more circular economy: proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models Resources. Conservation and Recycling 112: 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015
Yun JJ (2017) Business model design compass: open Innovation funnel to Schumpeterian New ombination business model developing circle. Cham (Switzerland): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4128-0_11