Values of young employees: Z-generation perception
The current paper aims to analyse the importance of values of young employees now and in five years period.
In order to achieve the aim, the questionnaire consisting of fifty statements was developed and disseminated between the Latvian students. The sample size was 392, which shows that the results represent the whole populations. For data processing, factor analysis was chosen as a tool. The data factorability was assessed via Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity, Kaiser-Myer-Olkin (KMO) statistic, initial estimates of communality and the anti-image correlation matrix. The factors were extracted via principal axis factoring (PAF). The number of factors was determined by the scree plot/Kaiser’s rule and was equal to five in both cases. The results showed the for the young employees the essential values today are those connected to the personality trait. However, in five years, the essential values would be those that are linked to professional development.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ahmed SU, Islam Z, Mahtab H, Hasan I (2014) Institutional investment and corporate social performance: linkage towards sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 21 (1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1298
Ariani DW (2017) Why do i study? The mediating effect of motivation and self-regulation on student performance. Business, Management and Education 14 (2): 153-178. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2016.329
Becton JB, Walker HJ, Jones-Farmer A (2014) Generational differences in workplace behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 44 (3): 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12208
Bejtkovsky J (2013) Age management concept – opportunity or threat. In: Soliman KS (Ed.). 22nd IBIMA conference on Creating Global Competitive Economies: 2020 Vision Planning & Implementation. Rome: IBIMA, 805-813.
Bencsik A, Juhász T, Horváth-Csikós G (2016) Y and Z Generations at Workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness 6 (3): 90-106. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
Breffle WS, Morey ER, Thacher JA (2011) A joint latent-class model: combining likert-scale preference statements with choice data to harvest preference heterogeneity. Environmental and Resource Economics 50 (1): 83-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9463-0
Bridge T (2015) 5 ways the workplace needs to change to get the most out of generation http://bit.ly/2MQZ4Qo
Cennamo L, Gardner D (2011) Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. I. EEE Engineering Management Review 39 (2): 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2011.5876170
Ciabuca A (2015) The development of a semantic differential scale for assessing the perceived image of citizens about Romanian police forces. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 187: 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.006
Durana P, Kliestikova J, Kovacova M (2019) The quality of brand products: expected attributes vs. perceived reality. Economics and Culture 16 (1): 98-107. https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2019-0011
Francis T, Hoefel F (2018) “True Gen”: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company.
Half R (2015) Get ready for generation Z. Maclean’s 127 (28): 42-45.
Jamil NI, Baharuddin FN, Maknu TSR (2015) Factors mining in engaging students learning styles using exploratory factor analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance 31: 722-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01161-2
Kahveci A (2015) Assessing high school students’ attitudes toward chemistry with a shortened semantic differential. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16 (2): 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00186A
Kurtuldu MK, Bulut D (2017) Development of a self-efficacy scale toward piano lessons. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 17 (3). https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.3.0209
Lentjusenkova O, Titko J, Lapina I (2016) Intellectual capital investments: analysis of the predicted outcomes. In: Simberova I, Zizlavsky O, Milichovsky F (Eds). 21th International Scientific Conference of Smart and Efficient Economy: Preparation for the Future Innovative Economy. Brno, 94-101.
Marron MB (2015) New generations require changes beyond the digital. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 70 (2): 123-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695815588912
Mileski M, Scott Kruse C, Lee K, Baar Topinka J (2016) Perceptions of the value of professional networking by undergraduate students in a school of health administration: a pilot study. The Journal of Health Administration Education 33 (3): 461-474.
Moto S, Ratanaolarn T, Tuntiwongwanich S, Pimdee P (2018) A Thai junior high school students’ 21st century information literacy, media literacy, and ICT literacy skills factor analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET) 13 (09): 87. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8355
Mouselli S, Khalifa B (2017) Entrepreneurship in crisis: the determinants of Syrian students’ entrepreneurial intentions. Business, Management and Education 15 (2): 159-173. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2017.386
Ozkan M, Solmaz B (2015) Mobile addiction of generation Z and its effects on their social lifes. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 205: 92-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.027
Petsky HL, Cates CJ, Lasserson TJ, Li AM, Turner C, Kynaston JA, Chang AB (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis: tailoring asthma treatment on eosinophilic markers (exhaled nitric oxide or sputum eosinophils). Thorax 67 (3): 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.135574
Popescu D, Popa DM, Cotet BG (2019) Getting ready for Generation Z students – considerations on 3D printing curriculum. Propósitos y Representaciones 7 (2): 255-268. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n2.280
Quintanilha LF (2017) Inovação pedagógica universitária mediada pelo Facebook e YouTube: uma experiência de ensino-aprendizagem direcionado à geração-Z. Educar Em Revista (65): 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.50027
Roblek V, Mesko M, Dimovski V, Peterlin J (2019) Smart technologies as social innovation and complex social issues of the Z generation. Kybernetes 48 (1): 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2017-0356
Ruzsa C (2018) Key characteristics of generation Z and main challenges to be expected in the labor market. In Tonkovic AM, Crnkovic B (Eds.). 7th International Scientific Symposium on Economy of Eastern Croatia – Vision And Growth. Osijek: Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Ekonomski fakultet u Osijeku, 251-259.
Seemiller C, Grace M (2016) Generation Z Goes to College (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sever M (2014) Adapting classroom engagement inventory into turkish culture. Egitim ve Bilim 39 (176): 171-182. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3627
Singh AP, Dangmei J (2016) Understanding the generation Z: the future workforce. South-Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 3 (3).
Sreejesh S, Mohapatra S, Anusree MR (2014) Business research methods. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00539-3
Tulgan B (2013) Meet generation Z: The second generation within the giant „Millennial” cohort. RainmakerThinking.
Twenge JM, Campbell SM, Hoffman BJ, Lance CE (2010) Generational differences in work Values: leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management 36 (5): 1117-1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352246
West M (2014) What manufacturers need to know about generation Z. Manufacturing Engineering 153 (1): 168-168.