Share:


Creating an atmosphere: media aesthetic analysis of journalistic prospects

    Marina V. Zagidullina   Affiliation

Abstract

In this article, journalistic practices are examined under the perspectives of 1) the theory of atmosphere in communication, 2) the creativity in journalism through the media aesthetic approach. This article contributes to both the theory of creativity in media industries, and the theory of aesthetic shift in current communication (with respect to the generation of atmospheric design in media). The empirical material used in this article was extracted from the Russian journalist Web portal Takie dela (English: So It Goes). The concept of “atmospheric creativity” in the current journalistic practices is developed.


Santrauka


Šiame straipsnyje žurnalistikos praktika tyrinėjama, remiantis komunikacijos terpės teorija ir kūrybiškumu žurnalistikoje estetiniu medijų požiūriu. Šiuo straipsniu prisidedama tiek prie kūrybiškumo teorijos medijų industrijose, tiek prie estetinio pokyčio teorijos dabartinėje komunikacijoje (atsižvelgiant į modeliuojamos terpės kūrimą medijose). Šiame straipsnyje naudota Rusijos žurnalistų interneto svetainės Takie dela (liet. Tokie reikalai) empirinė medžiaga. Dabartinėje žurnalistikos praktikoje plėtojama „terpės kūrybiškumo“ koncepcija.


Reikšminiai žodžiai: terpė estetikoje, kūrybiškumas žurnalistikoje, įtraukioji žurnalistika, estetinė medijų analizė, daugiakryptė žurnalistika.

Keyword : atmosphere in aesthetics, creativity in journalism, immersive journalism, media aesthetic analysis, multimodal journalism

How to Cite
Zagidullina, M. , V. (2020). Creating an atmosphere: media aesthetic analysis of journalistic prospects. Creativity Studies, 13(1), 152-163. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11557
Published in Issue
Mar 20, 2020
Abstract Views
69
PDF Downloads
43
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073

Benjamin, W. (2010). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. London: Prism Key Press.

Böhme, G. (1993). Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics. Thesis Eleven, 36(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551369303600107

Böhme, G. (2013). The art of the stage set as a paradigm for an aesthetics of atmospheres. Ambiances: Environnement sensible, architecture et espace urbain. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/345f/e99a788bb60c042cb541c52b2c93dbe49875.pdf?_ga=2.198816175.1237635802.1574435684-199233841.1528889777

Böhme, G. (2003). The space of bodily presence and space as a medium of representation. In M. Hård, A. Lösch, & D. Verdicchio (Eds.), Transforming spaces: the topological turn in technological studies (pp. 1–7). Darmstadt: University of Technology Darmstadt. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f5a2/c65023e437eeb398222f601b052ec42875ed.pdf

Coffee, S. (2010). Exploring creativity through freelance journalism: testing out the systems model. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c63f/c500b78b97b1a1d7963b375dfdf984f41d38.pdf?_ga=2.110913996.854713691.1579118179-199233841.1528889777

Deuze, M. (2019). On creativity. Journalism, 20(1), 130–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807066

Edensor, T., & Sumartojo, Sh. (2015). Designing atmospheres: introduction to special issue. Visual Communication, 14(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357215582305

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Glebovich, T. A. (2019). Sostradaniye kak kul’turnyy perekrestok: o nekotorykh osobennostyakh istoriy bezdomnykh na portale Takiye dela. In O. Avtokhutdinova, B. Lozovskij, I. Zinov’ev, V. Oleshko, E. Chepkina, Y. Chemyakin, & E. Golousova (Eds.), Tsifrovizatsiya kommunikativno-kul’turnoy pamyati: rol’ zhurnalistiki kak sotsial’nogo instituta (pp. 24–28). Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University Publications.

Klages, L. (1970). Grundlegung der Wissenschaft vom Ausdruck. Bonn: Bouvier.

Klages, L. (1972). Vom kosmogonischen Eros. Bonn: Bouvier.

Kress, G., & Leeuwen, van Th. (2006). Reading images: the grammar of visual design. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Leeuwen, van Th. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203647028


Malmelin, N., & Nivari-Lindström, L. (2017). Rethinking creativity in journalism: implicit theories of creativity in the Finnish Magazine industry. Journalism, 18(3), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915620272

Manovich, L. (2014). Post-media aesthetics. In M. Kinder & T. McPherson (Eds.), Transmedia frictions: the digital, the arts, and the humanities (pp. 34–44). Oakland, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520957695-006

Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Series: Leonardo. R. F. Malina (Series Ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Markham, T. (2012). The politics of journalistic creativity: expressiveness, authenticity and de-authorization. Journalism Practice, 6(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.616651

O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis (pp. 120–137). London, New York: Continuum.

O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Pham, D.-S., Bateman, J., & Vande Moere, A. (2018). A digital mixed methods research design: integrating multimodal analysis with data mining and information visualization for big data analytics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816651015

O’Halloran, K., Tan, S., Smith, B., & Podlasov, A. (2010). Challenges in designing digital interfaces for the study of multimodal phenomena. Information Design Journal, 18(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.18.1.02hal

O’Halloran, K., Wignell, P., & Tan, S. (2019). Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: from metafunctions to materiality by Per Ledin and David Machin. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(5), 514–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1556173

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

Schmitz, H. (1964). System der Philosophie. Vol. 3. Bonn: Bouvier.

Steensen, S. (2016). The intimization of journalism. In T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, & A. Hermida (Eds.) (pp. 113–127), The SAGE handbook of digital journalism. Los Angeles: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957909.n8

Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897

Takie dela. (2017). There Once Lived…. Esma, 76 Years Old. https://takiedela.ru/homeless/en/story3/

Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Kozulin, A. (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. (2019). Dormition of the mother of god. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dormition_of_the_Mother_of_God#/media/File:Theofanus_uspenie.jpg

Wilson, E. (1999). The bohemianization of mass culture. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/136787799900200102