Share:


Assemblage of memory: on the structure, process and creativity in collective memory

Abstract

The article is aimed at presenting and discussing the theoretical concept of assemblage of memory inspired by and grounded in the creative work done in connection with social research within the framework of participatory theatre. Based on three projects of this kind that I have collaborated on over the last couple of years, all taking memory as their theme, The Method of National Constellations (2014–2016), Prayer: A Common Theatre (2016–2017), and Bieżenki (2018), the concept draws both on artistic, and sociological thinking. An assemblage of memory could be roughly described as a product of creativity, which is constructed using “found” materials, such as stories, images, emotions, behaviours, objects, people even, to compose a new meaningful entity. This is congruent with what became to be known as the assemblage theory, started by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, who suggested that social phenomena, such as collective memory, one could add, should be viewed as dynamic and heterogeneous arrangements of a variety of elements, material and immaterial, natural and artificial, human and non-human, that are dependent on the connections between them rather than their intrinsic qualities. Thus, an assemblage of memory cannot be accessed through text-oriented methodologies that still seem to predominate the humanities (with its focus on the witness and testimony), but requires innovative, creative procedures, which, as exemplified by the above mentioned theatrical projects, are capable of revealing its structure and dynamics.

Keyword : assemblage, assemblage theory, collective memory, history, participatory theatre, theatre-based research practice

How to Cite
Niziołek, K. (2021). Assemblage of memory: on the structure, process and creativity in collective memory. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.12290
Published in Issue
Jun 23, 2021
Abstract Views
66
PDF Downloads
61
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Alexievich, S. (2016). Chernobyl prayer. A chronicle of the future. Series: Modern Classics. Penguin Books.

Alexievich, S. (2018). The unwomanly face of war. Series: Modern Classics. Penguin Books.

Alexievich, S. (2006). Voices from Chernobyl: the oral history of a nuclear disaster. Picador.

Assis de, P. (2018). Logic of experimentation: rethinking music performance through artistic research. Leuven University Press. https://doi.org/10.11116/9789461662507

Bell, D. (1972). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 6(1/2), 11–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3331409

Benjamin, W. (2008). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Penguin Books.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Duke University Press Books. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623

Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.

Chaberski, M. (2016). Performans jako asamblaż. Didaskalia, 133–134, 84–91.

Chidgey, R. (2018). Feminist afterlives: assemblage memory in activist times. Series: Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98737-8

Collingwood, R. G. (2005). The idea of history. Oxford University Press.

DeLanda, M. (2019). A new philosophy of society: assemblage theory and social complexity. Series: Bloomsbury Revelations. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350096769

DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2019). A Thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Series: Bloomsbury Revelations. Bloomsbury Academic.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1986). Kafka: toward a minor literature. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/468842

Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues. Columbia University Press.

Elger, D. (2004). Dadaism. Series: Taschen Basic Art. Taschen.

Finkelpearl, T. (2013). What we made: conversations on art and social cooperation. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395515

Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity versus postmodernity. New German Critique, 22, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/487859

Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Series: The Heritage of Sociology. D. N. Levine (Ed.). The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226774497.001.0001

Hamilakis, Y. (2017). Sensorial assemblages: affect, memory and temporality in assemblage thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000676

Hirsch, M. (2012). The generation of postmemory: writing and visual culture after the Holocaust. Columbia University Press.

Instytut Pamięci Narodowej. (2005). Informacja o ustaleniach końcowych śledztwa S 28/02/Zi w sprawie pozbawienia życia 79 osób – mieszkańców powiatu Bielsk Podlaski w tym 30 osób tzw. furmanów w lesie koło Puchał Starych, dokonanych w okresie od dnia 29 stycznia 1946r. do dnia 2 lutego 1946. https://ipn.gov.pl/pl/dla-mediow/komunikaty/9989,Informacja-o-ustaleniach-koncowych-sledztwa-S-2802Zi-w-sprawie-pozbawienia-zycia.html

Instytut Pamięci Narodowej. (2019). Komunikat dotyczący informacji zawartych w ustaleniach końcowych śledztwa S 28/02/Zi w sprawie pozbawienia życia 79 osób – mieszkańców powiatu Bielsk Podlaski, w tym 30 osób tzw. furmanów w lesie koło Puchał Starych, dokonanych w okresie od dnia 29 stycznia 1946 r. do dnia 2 lutego 1946 r. https://ipn.gov.pl/pl/dla-mediow/komunikaty/67471,Komunikatdotyczacy-informacji-zawartych-w-ustaleniach-koncowych-sledztwa-S-2802.html

Kaitavuori, K. (2018). The participator in contemporary art: art and social relationships. I.B. Tauris. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350989061

Kester, G. H. (2004). Conversation pieces: community and communication in modern art. University of California Press.

Kondratiuk, A., Sawczuk, K., & Szerszunowicz, A. (2017). Jestem, bo wrócili. Przywracanie pamięci w setną rocznicę bieżeństwa. Stowarzyszenie OrthNet.

Lacy, S. (1995a). Cultural pilgrimages and metaphoric journeys. In S. Lacy (Ed.), Mapping the terrain: new genre public art (pp. 19–47). Bay Press.

Lacy, S. (1995b). Debated territory: toward a critical language for public art. In S. Lacy (Ed.), Mapping the terrain: new genre public art (pp. 171–185). Bay Press.

Lowenhaupt Tsing, A. (2015). The mushroom and the end of the world: on the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873548

Malzaher, F. (2012). Dramaturgie opieki i odbierania pewności: Historia Rimini Protokoll. In M. Dreysse & F. Malzaher (Eds.), Rimini Protokoll. Na tropie codzienności (pp. 12–39). Ha!art.

Massumi, B. (1996). A user’s guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia: deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. The MIT Press.

Massumi, B. (2019). Notes on the translation and acknowledgements. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia (xv–xviii). Series: Bloomsbury Revelations. Bloomsbury Academic.

Museum of Modern Art. (1961). [press release] No. 110. https://www.moma.org/momaorg/shared/pdfs/docs/press_archives/2897/releases/MOMA_1961_0112_110.pdf

Narine, A. (Ed.). (2015). Eco-trauma cinema. Series: Routledge Advances in Film Studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762814

Niziołek, K. (2018a). Art as a means to produce social benefits and social innovations. In V. D. Alexander, S. Hägg, S. Häyrynen, & E. Sevänen (Eds.), Art and the challenge of markets. Vol. 2. From commodification of art to artistic critiques of capitalism (pp. 117–144). Series: Sociology of the Arts. Palgrave Macmillan.

Niziołek, K. (2018b). Performing memory. Between document and participation. Art and Documentation, 18, 207–215.

Niziołek, K. (2019). Echa Lucimia. Idea sztuki społecznej a współczesne praktyki społeczno-artystyczne, Konteksty. Polska Sztuka Ludowa, 73(4), 17–23.

Niziołek, K. (2016). Partycypacja i dialog jako demokratyczne praktyki artystyczne. In G. D. Stunża & K. Stachura (Eds.), Kultura od nowa. Badania – trendy – praktyka (pp. 28–38). Instytut Kultury Miejskiej.

Niziołek, K., & Sawicka-Mierzyńska, K. (2019). Bieżenki. W stronę interdyscyplinarnych badań w działaniu. In A. Karpowicz, M. Litwinowicz, & M. Rakoczy (Eds.), Opowiedziane. Historia mówiona w praktykach humanistycznych (pp. 129–139). IKP UW.

Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520

Phillips, J. (2006). Agencement/Assemblage. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 108–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300219

Pollack, M. (2014). Skażone krajobrazy. Wydawnictwo Czarne.

Prymaka-Oniszk, A. (2016). Bieżeństwo 1915. Zapomniani uchodźcy. Wydawnictwo Czarne.

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7

Schneider, R. (2011). Performing remains: art and war in times of theatrical reenactment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852873

Seitz, W. C. (1961). The art of assemblage. The Museum of Modern Art.

Taylor, D. (2003). The archive and the repertoire: performing cultural memory in the Americas. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385318

The Nobel Prize. (2015). The Nobel Prize in literature 2015 – press release. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2015/press-release/