Modelling the ways to increase the creativity of psychology students as a basic factor in professional development
One of the important tasks of the modern system of psychology in higher educational institutions is not only the development of student’s professional potential but also the comprehensive development of their personality. The purpose of the article is to systematize the process of increasing the creativity of psychology students with the help of mechanisms and elements of the functional model of IDEF0. The novelty of this study lies in the fact that in the field of education, in particular, increasing such a subjective indicator as creative abilities, there has not yet been a methodology that allows forming an understandable and simple, but at the same time flexible system of actions. The reason for choosing this model was that it is the most visual and easy to understand for representatives of higher educational institutions. Also, this model is universal in terms of adding separate sublevels and subtasks, if for a particular educational institution it turns out to be incomplete or insufficiently detailed. Thus, it is the IDEF0 model that can reveal to the greatest extent such a subjective process as an increase in creativity among psychology students. The steps for increasing the creativity of psychology students are presented, which are the result of scrupulous analysis and many years of research by the authors in this area. The scientific contribution of this article can be considered the formation of a mechanism for increasing the creativity of psychology students, not in the context of creating a clear methodology, but in the context of forming a universal algorithm with poly-levels for detailing the goal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bruno, A., & Dell’Aversana, G. (2017). Reflective practice for psychology students: the use of reflective journal feedback in higher education. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716686288
Burkšaitienė, N. (2018). How can university learning environment contribute to students’ creativity? Lithuanian students’ perspective. Creativity Studies, 11(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.271
Chen, Y., Jia Hu, J., & Mo, P. (2008, 12–14 October). The development of the lifecycle function model by IDEF0 for construction projects. In Proceedings of 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. Dalian, China. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4679950&casa_token=51lC5QhZbiMAAAAA:RZRlarfkK0vhcSPPHklQtT06CmD05zcOsvqFW4TpxK37uKq6FwIqa4vpfLT4GChH76iW7DMQ_VAX&tag=1
Chernyaga, P., & Yanchuk, O. (2012). The order of value access point for GPS: be careful in the minds of obscured appearances. New Access to Geodesic Science and Technology, 23, 53–56.
Cheung, Ch.-K., Rudowicz, E., Yue, X., & Kwan, A. S. F. (2003). Creativity of university students: what is the impact of field and year of study? Journal of Creative Behavior, 37(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00825.x
Davtyan, L. L., & Holod, A. S. (2019). IDEF0-Model for rationalization management industrial pharmacy. Pharmaceutical Magazine, 6, 18–25.
Dickhut, J. E. (2003). A brief review of creativity. http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/dickhut.html
Entrialgo, M., & Iglesias, V. (2020). Entrepreneurial intentions among university students: the moderating role of creativity. European Management Review, 17(2), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12386
Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: the nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113–130). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.009
Fekula, M. J. (2011). Managerial creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence: convergence in course design. Business Education Innovation Journal, 30(2), 92–102.
Goodman, S. (2015). Fuel creativity in the classroom with divergent thinking. George Lucas Educational Foundation “Edutopia”. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/fueling-creativity-through-divergentthinking-classroom-stacey-goodman
Grigor’evich Bermus, A. (2018). Problemy i perspektivy realizatsii kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v obrazovanii. Eidos. https://studfile.net/preview/6268118/
Halil, V. V. (2016). Security management of the Republic of Belarus on methodologies of IDEF0. Information Processing Systems, 9, 203–207.
Hassan Hemdan, A., & Kazem, A. M. (2019). Creativity development of high-achieving students. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641684
Kerr, Ch., & Lloyd, C. (2008). Pedagogical learnings for management education: developing creativity and innovation. Journal of Management and Organization, 14(5), 486–503. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.8188.8.131.526
Kondakov, I. (2020). Metodologicheskiye osnovy zarubezhnykh teoriy professional’nogo razvitiya. Psihologicheskie problemy, 25(2), 158–164.
Langebak, R., Tanggaard, L., Toft, N., & Berendt, M. (2020). Using creativity as an educational tool in veterinary surgery: students’ perceptions and surgical performance. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1117-175r1
Laycraft, K. Cz. (2012). The development of creativity: a study of creative adolescents and young adults [PhD/Doctoral Thesis, University of Calgary]. Canada. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/11023/166/ucalgary_2012_laycraft_krystyna.pdf?sequence=2
Ling, M. K. D., & Loh, S. Ch. (2020). Relationship of creativity and critical thinking to pattern recognition among Singapore private school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1716203
Lopukhova, O. G. (2014). Dynamics of psychology students’ “Image of a Psychologist” conception during education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.341
Navickienė, V., Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Ž., Valantinaitė, I., & Žilinskaitė-Vytienė, V. (2019). The relationship between communication and education through the creative personality of the teacher. Creativity Studies, 12(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2019.6472
Panok, V. (2019). Kontseptual’no pidkhodyty do formal’nosti praktykuyuchoho psykholoha. Praktychna psykholohiya ta sotsial’na robota, 4, 75–97.
Po-Han, Ch., Tiong, L. K., & Laiyun, W. (2003). Information sharing and exchange in the architectural design and structural design phase. Civil Engineering Research, 6, 28–30.
Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2001). Improving the science education of psychology students: better teaching of methodology. Teaching of Psychology, 28(3), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2803_02
Renzulli, J. S. (1992). A general theory for the development of creative productivity through the pursuit of ideal acts of learning. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600402
Rikova, L. L. (2009). Strukturnyye i funktsional’nyye modeli, kotoryye meneye rasprostraneny v yestestvennykh i matematicheskikh naukakh. Pedagogicheskaya nauka: istoriya, teoriya, praktika, tendentsii razvitiya, 3. http://www.intellect-invest.org.ua/pedagog_editions_e-magazine_pedagogical_science_arhiv_pn_n3_2009_st_8/
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
Sanz de Acedo Baquedano, M. T., & Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga, M. L. (2012). A correlational and predictive study of creativity and personality of college students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39398
Shandruk, S. (2020). Spetsifika podgotovki prakticheskikh psikhologov k professional’noy deyatel’nosti: problemy podgotovki i povysheniya kvalifikatsii prakticheskikh psikhologov v vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniyakh (pp. 32–36). Kyiv.
Shevchenko, N. (2019). Funktsionuvannya profesiynoyi svidomosti psykholoha v protsesi psykholohichnoho konsul’tuvannya. Problemy suchasnoyi psykholohiyi, 3(1), 95–101.
Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F. (2010). Educational creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 250–264). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.016
Sylkin, O., Kryshtanovych, M., Zachepa, A., Bilous, S., & Krasko, A. (2019). Modeling the process of applying anti-crisis management in the system of ensuring financial security of the enterprise. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 446–455. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2019.41
Wang, H., Gong, G., Xie, J., Cai, Sh., & Zheng, Y. (2012, 27–30 October). Research on IDEFo and UML combination based modeling of equipment support. In T. Xiao, L. Zhang, & M. Fei (Eds.), AsiaSim2012: Asia Simulation Conference 2012: Shanghai, China, October 2012. Proceedings, Part I. Series: Communications in Computer and Information Science. Vol. 323 (pp. 46–54). Shanghai, China. Springer.
Weisberg, R. W. (1988). Problem solving and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (pp. 148–176). Cambridge University Press.
Welch, R., Alfrey, L., & Harris, A. (2020). Creativity in Australian health and physical education curriculum and pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13573322.2020.1763943?casa_token=AO8o0_we2zYAAAAA:AeNfQ5_NdhbLXLHRQaqRCw395-PSZcyj2hakSGC_FCnDwDehMw9VyeVeCiA1XmVm61x65ZweVwB
Wells, P. C., & Dickens, K. N. (2020). Creativity in counselor education classroom: more than case studies. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 42, 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-019-09393-7
Yachmen, F. (2020). Functional model initial mortgage in IDEF0. Business Information, 4, 91–98.
Yanchuk, O., & Shulgan, R. B. (2019). Resheniye zadach zemleustroystva i kadastra s ispol’zovaniyem matematicheskoy modeli dlya soznaniy nevazhnykh. Zhurnal Natsional’nogo universiteta vodnoy gosudarstvennosti i kritiki prirody: tekhnologii, 3, 293–300.
Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Intellectual styles and creativity. In T. Rickards, M. A. Runco, & S. Moger (Eds.), The Routledge companion to creativity (pp. 256–266). Series: Routledge Companions. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888841.ch21