Methodological approach to determining the main factors for the development of creative thinking in students of creative professions
The phenomenon of a person’s creative thinking, as well as the mechanisms of its development,are in the problematic field of research of numerous scientists for many centuries. The relevance of these problems was reinforced in many respects by the desire of a person to understand his capabilities, to use them in order to create a comfortable environment around him. Interest in this problem at this stage of socio-historical development has its own special features.The questions that are raised in the study are what factors have the most significant influence on the development of creative thinking in students of creative professions. The main purpose of the article is to determine and compile the key factors for the development of creative thinking in students of creative professions as the main guarantee of their success. To do this, we have applied the methodology of the graph connections between the main factors, which will allow us to form a methodological approach to the hierarchical ordering of the most important factors in the development of creative thinking in students of creative professions as the main guarantee of their success. The subject of the research is the factors of influence on the creative thinking of students of creative specialties. The results of the study led to the formation of the key factors influencing the development of creative thinking among students of creative professions through expert analysis and a survey of specialists in this field and literature. The practical value of the study is to determine the key factors of influence on the development of creative thinking in students and the possibility of using the proposed methodological approach, in particular. The study has limitations and they consist because the process of determining the key factors for the development of creative thinking in students of creative professions took place only considering the specifics of the activities of educational institutions in Ukraine.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
Burkšaitienė, N. (2018). How can university learning environment contribute to students’ creativity? Lithuanian students’ perspective. Creativity Studies, 11(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.271
Carabine, J. (2013). Creativity, art and learning: a psycho-social exploration of uncertainty. The International Journal of Art and Design Education, 32(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01745.x
Carvalho, S. W., & Oliveira Mota, de M. (2010). The role of trust in creating value and student loyalty in relational exchanges between higher education institutions and their students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20(1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241003788201
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: the nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113–130). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.009
Hu, R., Xiaohui, S., & Shieh, Ch.-J. (2017). A study on the application of creative problem solving teaching to statistics teaching. EURASIA: Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3139–3149. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00708a
James, M. A. (2015). Managing the classroom for creativity. Creative Education, 6, 1032–1043. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.610102
Kalpokas, I., Sabaliauskaitė, E., & Pegushina, V. (2020). Creating students’ algorithmic selves: shedding light on social media’s representational affordances. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.10803
Kaplan, D. E. (2019). Creativity in education: teaching for creativity development. Psychology, 10, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.102012
Karavanova Zhalalovna, L., Evgenievich Shishov, S., Mikhaylovna Rozhnova, T., Sergeevna Rozhnova, K., Veniaminovna Polozhentseva, I., & Petrovna Lobacheva, L. (2020). Development of students’ individual creativity in higher education institutions: project based learning. Universidad y Sociedad: Revista Cientifica de la Universidad de Cienfuegos, 12(2), 380–384.
Khalid, M., Saad, S., Abdul Hamid, S. R., Ridhuan Abdullah, M., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
Kryshtanovych, M., Bilyk, V., Hanushchyn, S., Sheremet, I., & Vasylenko, K. (2021). Modelling the ways to increase the creativity of psychology students as a basic factor in professional development. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.12571
Langebak, R., Tanggaard, L., Toft, N., & Berendt, M. (2020). Using creativity as an educational tool in veterinary surgery: students’ perceptions and surgical performance. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1117-175r1
Ling, M. K. D., & Cheong Loh, S. (2020). Relationship of creativity and critical thinking to pattern recognition among Singapore private school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1716203
Mansoor, A. (2010). Teaching creative writing to university level second language learners in Pakistan. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 7(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2010.514052
Mareque, M., Prada, de E., & Pino-Juste, M. (2019). Creativity among business and tourism management university students: determining sociodemographic factors. Creativity Studies, 12(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2019.6925
Navickienė, V., Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Ž., Valantinaitė, I., & Žilinskaitė-Vytienė, V. (2019). The relationship between communication and education through the creative personality of the teacher. Creativity Studies, 12(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2019.6472
Novak, J. D. (2009). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Routledge.
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Teaching psychology students that creativity is a decision. The General Psychologist, 36(1), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/e592592007-003
Zacher, H., & Johnson, E. (2015). Leadership and creativity in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1210–1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881340