Share:


Artist’s creative contributions in the context of interdisciplinary research

    Kyong-Mi Paek Affiliation

Abstract

While expectations regarding art’s potential contributions to the interdisciplinary research context continue to grow, the creative endeavors of individual artists remain under-examined, perhaps because of the inter-relational nature of joint research settings. To explore, how artists navigate their contribution to a given research community, this study reviews the art practice of Seung-Hyun Ko, who participated in Science Walden, a Convergent Research Center carrying out an interdis-ciplinary research project that aimed to build an ecologically sustainable community. Drawing on comprehensive views of creativity that emphasize the importance of the social context in which the efforts of individuals emerge and are assessed, the study examines Ko’s recent collaborative practice in Science Walden within the larger context of his long-term practice as a leading artist of Yatoo, a bioregionally conscious artist community. Ko’s responses to the opportunities and challenges of his involvement in these two interrelated contexts disclose the value of the creative dynamics of interdisciplinary research, with implications for the increasingly diverse interdisciplinary research practices emerging within science and technology.


Santrauka


Nors lūkesčiai dėl galimo meno indėlio į tarpdalykinių mokslinių tyrimų kontekstą ir toliau auga, paskirų menininkų kūrybinės pastangos lieka nepakankamai išnagrinėtos galbūt dėl nustatytų bendrojo moksliniams tyrimams taikomo tarpusavio santykių pobūdžio. Siekiant ištirti, kaip mokslininkai integruoja savo indėlį į konkrečią mokslinius tyrimus atliekančią bendruomenę, šiame straipsnyje apžvelgiama meno praktika, plėtojama Seung-Hyuno Ko, dirbusio Konvergencinių mokslinių tyrimų centre Science Walden, kuriame vykdomas tarpdalykinis mokslinių tyrimų projektas, o šio tikslas – sukurti ekologiniu požiūriu tvarią bendruomenę. Remiantis išsamiais požiūriais į kūrybiškumą, pabrėžiančiais socialinio konteksto, kuriame randasi individualios pastangos ir kuriame jos yra įvertinamos, svarbą, straipsnyje tyrinėjama naujausia Ko bendradarbiavimo praktika, išplėtota Science Walden. Tai daroma išsamesniame jo, kaip lyderiaujančio Yatoo – bioregionine prasme sąmoningų menininkų bendruomenei priklausančio menininko – ilgalaikės praktikos kontekste. Ko atsakas į jo įsitraukimo nulemtas galimybes ir iššūkius šiuose dviejuose tarpusavyje susijusiuose kontekstuose atskleidžia tarpdalykinių mokslinių tyrimų kūrybinės dinamikos vertę ir vis skirtingesnių tarpdalykinių mokslinių tyrimų praktikų, iškylančių moksle ir technologijose, reikšmes.


Reikšminiai žodžiai: bendradarbiavimas, išsamūs požiūriai, kūrybinė praktika, tarpdalykiniai moksliniai tyrimai, Science Walden, Yatoo.

Keyword : collaboration, comprehensive views, creative practice, interdisciplinary research, Science Walden, Yatoo

How to Cite
Paek, K.-M. (2019). Artist’s creative contributions in the context of interdisciplinary research. Creativity Studies, 12(1), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2019.9141
Published in Issue
May 24, 2019
Abstract Views
79
PDF Downloads
75
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Aguilar, O. M., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2008). Growing environmental stewards: The overall effect of a school gardening program on environmental attitudes and environmental locus of control of different demographic groups of elementary school children. HortTechnology, 18(2), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.18.2.243

Arts Education Partnership. (2007). Working partnerships: professional development of the arts teaching workforce. Retrieved from http://www.aep-arts.org/wp-content/uploads/Working-Partnerships-1.pdf

Blandy, D., Congdon, K. G., & Krug, D. H. (1998). Art, ecological restoration, and art education. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 39(3), 230-243. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320366

Cho, J. (2017). Philosophy of convergence research: “Science Walden”, convergence research project of science and art. Convergence Research Review, 3(6), 33-64.

Cho, J. (2019). 2016: What do you consider the most interesting recent (scientific) news? What makes it important? Edge. Retrieved from https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26660

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity: the collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. New York: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Curtis, D. J., Reid, N., & Ballard, G. (2012). Communicating ecology through art: what scientists think. Ecology and Society, 17(2). Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss2/art3/

Efland, A. D. (1995). The spiral and the lattice: changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 36(3), 134-153. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320905

Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Gablik, S. (1992). Connective Aesthetics. American Art, 6(2), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1086/424147

Garoian, Ch. R. (1998). Art education and the aesthetics of land use in the age of ecology. Studies in Art Education, 39(3), 244-261. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320367

GNAB: Geumgang Nature Art Biennale. (2019). Rural stages: GNAP 2017, Eastern Europe. Gabrovtsi, Bulgaria – Lazarea, Romania – Noszvaj, Hungary, 1–31 July, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.natureartbiennale.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=nomadic&wr_id=110&lang=eng

Gurevitz, R. (2000). Affective approaches to environmental education: going beyond the imagined worlds of childhood? Ethics, Place and Environment: A Journal Philosophy & Geography, 3(3), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/713665905

Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Skoumios, M. (2013). The development of environmental awareness through school science: problems and possibilities. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8, 405-426.

Hollis, C. L. (1997). On developing an art and ecology curriculum. Art Education, 50(6), 21-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/3193684

Inwood, H. J. (2008). At the crossroads: situating place-based art education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 13(1), 29-41.

Jacobson, S. K., Seavey, J. R., & Mueller, R. C. (2016). Integrated science and art education for creative climate change communication. Ecology and Society, 21(3). Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss3/art30/

Jeon, W. (2017). A prayer through Seung-Hyun’s Ko Kayageum: The sound of hundred years. In S. Ko, Kayageum: The Sound of Hundred Years, 6-7. Retrieved from https://en.calameo.com/read/0019600633f24f9a69304

Jeon, W. (2016). Yatoo-i: Yatoo International Project. Retrieved from http://www.yatooi.com/Yatooi?ckattempt=1

Jin, S. (2016). A study on Korean nature artists’ association – Yatoo (Master’s Thesis). Seoul, Hongik University [unpublished source].

Ko, S.-H., & Paek, K.-M. (2017). The practice in nature. Personal Interview (unpublished source).

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Lee, S. (2000). A Study on the Yatoo – nature art: centering on the study of four seasons’ in nature (Master’s Thesis). South Chungcheong Province, Kongju National University (unpublished source).

Neperud, R. W. (1997). Art, ecology and art education: practices & linkages. Art Education, 50(6), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3193683

Paek, K.-M. (2019). Communing with nature: the collective journey of Yatoo artists and its pedagogical potentials. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(1), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12182

Park, Y. (2013). A study on nature space/place of Lee Seung Taek and Ko Seung Hyun. Journal of Basic Design & Art, 14(4), 243-253.

Pluut, H., & Curşeu, P. L. (2013). The role of diversity of life experiences in fostering collaborative creativity in demographically diverse student groups. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.01.002

Rosenthal, A. T. (2003). Teaching systems thinking and practice through environmental art. Ethics and the Environment, 8(1), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1353/een.2003.0013

Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.

Spaid, S. (2002). Ecovention: current art to transform ecologies. Cincinnati, OH: The Contemporary Arts Center.

Steelman, T. A., Andrews, E., Baines, S., Bharadwaj, L., Bjornson, E. R., Bradford, L., Cardinal, K., Carriere, G., Fresque-Baxter, J., Jardine, T. D., MacColl, I., Macmillan, S., Marten, J., Orosz, C., Reed, M. G., Rose, I., Shmon, K., Shantz, S., Staples, K., Strickert, G., & Voyageur, M. (2018). Identifying transformational space for transdisciplinarity: using art to access the hidden third. Sustainability science. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11625-018-0644-4

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

Sullivan, G. (2007). Creativity as research practice in the visual arts. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 1181-1194). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3052-9_81

Thayer, Jr. R. L. (2003). Lifeplace: bioregional thought and practice. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Thoreau, H. D. (1854). Walden, or life in the woods. Boston: Ticknor and Fields. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.146169

Walker, H. (2001). Interviewing local artists: a curriculum resource in art teaching. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 42(3), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.2307/1321040