Multiple criteria assessment of high-rise timber buildings

    Laura Tupėnaitė Affiliation
    ; Viktorija Žilėnaitė Affiliation
    ; Loreta Kanapeckienė Affiliation
    ; Seyed Masoud Sajjadian Affiliation
    ; Tomas Gečys Affiliation
    ; Lina Sakalauskienė Affiliation
    ; Jurga Naimavičienė Affiliation


Although the majority of high-rise buildings are constructed from concrete and steel, there is a growing interest in the new generation of multi-storey timber buildings around the world and several ecologically sustainable structural systems have already been proposed. This research aims to review and compare the highest contemporary timber buildings in terms of economic and environmental efficiency. For this purpose, the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is used. Five high-rise timber buildings are assessed according to the developed system of economic and environmental criteria. According to the multiple criteria assessment results, Mjøsa Tower, currently the tallest timber building in the world, located in Brumunddal, Norway, is ranked in the first place. This study also reveals that high-rise timber buildings are environmental friendly and high economic efficiency can be achieved by using lightweight modern engineered timber products, moreover, prefabrication of elements reduces duration and cost of the project.

First published online 03 February 2020

Keyword : high-rise timber buildings, engineered timber products, structural systems, economic and environmental performance, multiple criteria assessment, SAW

How to Cite
Tupėnaitė, L., Žilėnaitė, V., Kanapeckienė, L., Sajjadian, S. M., Gečys, T., Sakalauskienė, L., & Naimavičienė, J. (2019). Multiple criteria assessment of high-rise timber buildings. Engineering Structures and Technologies, 11(3), 87-94.
Published in Issue
Dec 31, 2019
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Archinect. (2016). World’s tallest wood building constructed in Vancouver. Retrieved from

Avellan, K. C. (2018, April 25–27). Massive wood elements and modular housing technology as innovative building concept of sustainable urban planning. Paper preseted at IABSE Conference – Engineering the Developing World, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Bergman, R., Puettmann, M., Taylor, A., & Skog, K. E. (2014). The carbon impacts of wood products. Forest Products Journal, 64(7/8), 220-231.

Börjesson, P., & Gustavsson, L. (2000). Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energy Policy, 28, 575-588.

Craighead, G. (2003). High-rise security and fire safety (2nd ed.). Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Cvetkovic, R., Stojić, D., Krasic, S., & Marković, N. (2015). Innovative structural CLT system in projecting and building of student houses. Facta universitatis – Series Architecture and Civil Engineering, 13(1), 57-64.

Design Build Network. (2019). The world’s tallest wooden buildings. Retrieved from

Franzini, F., Toivonen, R., & Toppinen, A. (2018). Why not wood? Benefits and barriers of wood as a multistory construction material: Perceptions of municipal civil servants from Finland. Buildings, 8, 159.

Gilbert, B. P., Bailleres, H., Zhang, H., & McGavin, R. L. (2017). Strength modelling of Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) beams. Construction and Building Materials, 149, 763-777.

KLH UK. (2012). Lendlease launches world’s tallest KLH tower. Retrieved from

MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Decision making among multiple – attribute alternatives: A survey and consolidated approach. RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA.

Mahapatra, K., Gustavsson, L., & Hemström, K. (2012). Multistorey wood‐frame buildings in Germany, Sweden and the UK. Construction Innovation, 12(1), 62-85.

Malo, K. A., Abrahamsen, R. B., & Bjertnæs, M. A. (2016). Some structural design issues of the 14-storey timber framed building “Treet” in Norway. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 74(3), 407-424.

Petersen, A. K., & Solberg, B. (2002). Greenhouse gas emissions, life-cycle inventory and cost-efficiency of using laminated wood instead of steel construction. Case: beams at Gardermoen airport. Environmental Science & Policy, 5, 169-182.

Quebec Wood Export Bureau (QWEB). (2015). Wood construction technologies in Quebec, Canada. Retrieved from

Ramage, M. H., Burridge, H., Busse-Wicher, M., Fereday, G., Reynolds, T., Shah, D. U., Wu, G., Yu, L., Fleming, P., Densley-Tingley, D., Allwood, J., Dupree, P., Linden, P. F., & Scherman, O. (2017). The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 333-359.

Skullestad, J. L., Bohne, R. A., & Lohne, J. (2016). High-rise timber buildings as a climate change mitigation measure – A comparative LCA of structural system alternatives. Energy Procedia, 96, 112-123.

Van De Kuilen, J. W. G., Ceccotti, A., Xia, Z., & He, M. (2011). Very tall wooden buildings with cross laminated timber. Procedia Engineering, 14, 1621-1628.

Voll Arkitekter. (2019). Mjøsa Tower. Retrieved from

Wood Skyscrapers. (2016). World’s tallest mass timber building – UBC Brock Commons 18 Stories residence rises. Retrieved from

WSP. (2018). Tall timber: How high can CLT go? Retrieved from