Share:


The change of coordinate system versus the area of parcels

    Elena Novikova   Affiliation
    ; Iryna Yeropunova   Affiliation
    ; Alena Palamar   Affiliation

Abstract

The transition from one coordinate system to another creates many problems, one of which is the change in the area of land parcels. There are at least three reasons causing a change in the area of the parcels after transition from one coordinate system to another. 1. The change in area associated with the transition from one reference ellipsoid to another; 2. The change in area due to deformations caused by random and systematic errors of one of the coordinate systems; 3. The change in the area of the parcel associated with the properties of the projection of Gauss-Krüger. It is shown that the greatest change in the area of the parcel during the transition from CS-63 to UCS-2000 (the coordinate systems of Ukraine) is associated with the properties of the Gauss-Krüger projection. For the parcel of 1 hectare, extreme changes in the area at the borders between the zones of the coordinate systems, can reach the size of 1.95 sq. m. When using local coordinate systems based on UCS-2000, extreme area changes can reach 7.02 sq. m per 1 hectare. It is concluded that the difference in the areas of parcels caused by the properties of the Gauss-Krüger projection could have been avoided if the prime meridians of the zones in the UCS-2000 and CS-63 systems coincided.

Keyword : CS-63, UCS-2000, the area of land parcels, the Gauss-Krüger projection

How to Cite
Novikova, E., Yeropunova, I., & Palamar, A. (2020). The change of coordinate system versus the area of parcels. Geodesy and Cartography, 46(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2020.6979
Published in Issue
Apr 6, 2020
Abstract Views
149
PDF Downloads
95
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Aleknavicius, A., & Sinkeviciute, V. (2008). Kartografija: mokomoji knyga. Ardiva. http://vuzf.asu.lt/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2015/01/kartografija_0.pdf

Bugaevskij, L., & Snyder, J. (1995). Map projections: A reference manual. Taylor & Francis.

Derzhheokadastr. (n.d.). Pasporty Derzhavnoyi heodezychnoyi referentsnoyi systemy koordynat USK-2000 (in Ukrainian). https://dgm.gki.com.ua/files/image/3261067/Pasport_UA_UCS-2000%20to%20ITRS_ITRF2000.pdf

Groten, E. (2000). Parameters of common relevance of astronomy, geodesy, and geodynamics. Journal of Geodesy, 74(1), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-000-0134-0

Standartinform. (2017). Global’naya navigatsionnaya sputnikovaya sistema. Sistemy koordinat. Metody preobrazovaniya koordinat opredelyayemykh tochek. Mezhgosudarstvennyy standart (GOST 32453-2017) (in Russian). http://www.gistoolkit.ru/download/laws/pravrf472.pdf

Kucher, O. (2012). Vnedreniye gosudarstvennoy referentsnoy sistemy koordinat Ukrainy. Problemy I Resheniya, 3(46), 67–73. (in Ukrainian). http://docplayer.ru/29191192-Vnedrenie-gosudarstvennoy-referencnoy.html

Minahropolityky. (2016). Poriadok vykorystannia Derzhavnoi heodezychnoi referentsnoi systemy koordynat USK-2000 pry zdiisnenni robit iz zemleustroiu (Zatverdzheno nakazom Ministerstva ahrarnoi polityky ta prodovolstva Ukrainy vid 02.12.2016 r. No. 509) (in Ukrainian). http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1646-16

Molnár, G., & Timár, G. (2005). Determination of the parameters of the abridging Molodensky formulae providing the best horizontal fit. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 7, 01018.

Novikova, E., Palamar, A., Makhonko, S., Barna, A., & Privalova, O. (2018). Transformation Parameters between UCS-2000 and WGS-84. Geodesy and Cartography, 44(2), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2018.1830

Parsova, V., Gurskiene, V., & Kaing, M. (2012). Real property cadastre in Baltic Countries. Jelgava. http://www.vzd.gov.lv/files/real_property_cadastre_baltic_countries.pdf

Petrulytė, E. (1998). Elements of land cadastre in Lithuania. Geodesy and Cartography, 24(1), 33–38.

Rapp, R. (1991). Geometric geodesy. Part I. Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Columbus, Ohio.

Rapp, R. (1993). Geometric geodesy. Part II. Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Stuifbergen, N. (2009). Wide zone transverse mercator projection. Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia. http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/364667/publication.html

Timár, G., & Molnár, G. (2013). Map grids and datums. Eötvös Lóránd University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259480162_Map_grids_and_datums

Torge, W. (2001). Geodesy. W. de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879957

Urozhay. (1998). Prohrama stvorennya avtomatyzovanoyi systemy vedennya derzhavnoho zemel′noho kadastru. In Zemel′ni vidnosyny v Ukrayini. Zakonodavchi akty i normatyvni dokumenty. Kyyiv (in Ukrainian).

Zakatov, P. (1962). A course in higher geodesy. Translated from Russian by Israel Program for Scientific Translation, for National Science Foundation, OTS 61-31212.