Share:


Supplier selection for housing development by an integrated method with interval rough boundaries

    Zhiying Zhang   Affiliation
    ; Huchang Liao   Affiliation
    ; Abdullah Al-Barakati   Affiliation
    ; Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Affiliation
    ; Jurgita Antuchevičienė   Affiliation

Abstract

Residential whole-decoration is an important initiative for housing industrialization in China. Selecting the most suitable component supplier for housing development is of great significance for both property developers and buyers in the implementation of such a strategy. To address such a problem, this study uses hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets to express the inaccurate judgments of individuals and then introduces a novel probability aggregation approach based on interval rough boundaries to enable a realistic presentation of the collective evaluations of a group. Then, we propose a hybrid multi-expert multiple criteria decision-making model by integrating the Best Worst Method (BWM) and Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method based on the interval rough boundaries. A case study about the supplier selection for housing development is carried out, which demonstrates the feasibility and applicability of our proposed hybrid model. A comparison study is also performed to further validate the robustness of the model.

Keyword : multi-criteria decision making, supplier selection for housing development, interval rough boundaries, Combined Compromise Solution method, Best-Worst method, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set, probabilistic linguistic term set

How to Cite
Zhang, Z., Liao, H., Al-Barakati, A., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2020). Supplier selection for housing development by an integrated method with interval rough boundaries. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 24(4), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2020.12434
Published in Issue
Jun 1, 2020
Abstract Views
504
PDF Downloads
194
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Multiple criteria hierarchy process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega, 41(5), 820–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.10.009

Eshtehardian, E., Ghodousi, P., & Bejanpour, A. (2013). Using ANP and AHP for the supplier selection in the construction and civil engineering companies: case study of Iranian company. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(2), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1141-z

Gou, X. J., Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., & Herrera, F. (2017). Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and MULTIMOORA method: a case of study to evaluate the implementation status of haze controlling measures. Information Fusion, 38, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.008

Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Slowinski, R. (2001). Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00167-3

Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. L. (1995). A sequential selection process in group decision making with a linguistic assessment approach. Information Sciences, 85(4), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(95)00025-K

Lam, K. C., Tao, R., & Lam, M. C. K. (2010). A material supplier selection model for property developers using fuzzy principal component analysis. Automation in Construction, 19(5), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.007

Li, H., Li, D., Zhai, Y., Wang, S., & Zhang, J. (2016). A novel attribute reduction approach for multi-label data based on rough set theory. Information Sciences, 367, 827–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.008

Liao, H. C., & Wu, X. L. (2020). DNMA: a double normalizationbased multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multicriteria decision making. Omega, 94, 102058.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.04.001

Liao, H. C., Jiang, L. S., Lev, B., & Fujita, H. (2019a). Novel operations of PLTSs based on the disparity degrees of linguistic terms and their use in designing the probabilistic linguistic ELECTRE III method. Applied Soft Computing, 80, 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.04.018

Liao, H. C., Mi, X. M., & Xu, Z. S. (2020). A survey of decisionmaking methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 19(1), 81–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-019-09309-5

Liao, H. C., Mi, X. M., Yu, Q., & Luo, L. (2019b). Hospital performance evaluation by a hesitant fuzzy linguistic best worst method with inconsistency repairing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.308

Liao, H. C., Wen, Z., & Liu, L. L. (2019c). Integrating BWM and ARAS under hesitant linguistic environment for digital supply chain finance supplier selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(6), 1188–1212. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.10716

Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., & Zeng, X. J. (2014). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23(5), 1343–1355. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2360556

Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2018). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application in decision making: a state-of-the art survey. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(7), 2084–2110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0432-9

Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., Zeng, X. J., & Merigó, J. M. (2015). Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 76, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.12.009

Luo, Z., He, J., Pan, H., & Yang, Y. (2016). Research on the selection strategy of green building parts supplier based on the catastrophe theory and Kent index method. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4673526

Matić, B., Jovanović, S., Das, D. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S., & Marinković, M. (2019). A new hybrid MCDM model: Sustainable supplier selection in a construction company. Symmetry, 11(3), 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030353

Mi, X. M., Liao, H. C., Wu, X. L., & Xu, Z. S. (2020). Probabilistic linguistic information fusion: a survey on aggregation operators in terms of principles, definitions, classifications, applications and challenges. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 35(3), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22216

Mi, X. M., Tang, M., Liao, H. C., Shen, W. J., & Lev, B. (2019). The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: why, what, what for and what’s next? Omega, 87, 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.01.009

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. (1999). Several opinions on promoting the modernization of housing industry and improving the quality of housing. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/200611/t20061101_155382.html

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. (2008). Notice on further strengthening the management of residential fit-out and decoration. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/200808/01/content_1061518.htm

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. (2013). Green building action plan. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-01/06/content_2305793.htm

Onar, S. Ç., Büyüközkan, G., Öztayşi, B., & Kahraman, C. (2016). A new hesitant fuzzy QFD approach: an application to computer workstation selection. Applied Soft Computing, 46, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.023

Pamučar, D., Mihajlović, M., Obradović, R., & Atanasković, P. (2017). Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers: hybrid DEMATELANP-MAIRCA model. Expert Systems with Applications, 88, 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.037

Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., & Ćirović, G. (2018). Modification of the Best–Worst and MABAC methods: a novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.042

Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 369, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009

Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001

Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2011). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076

Safa, M., Shahi, A., Haas, C. T., & Hipel, K. W. (2014). Supplier selection process in an integrated construction materials management model. Automation in Construction, 48, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.08.008

Seth, D., Nemani, V. K., Pokharel, S., & Al Sayed, A. Y. (2018). Impact of competitive conditions on supplier evaluation: a construction supply chain case study. Production Planning & Control, 29(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1407971

Shi, Q., Zuo, J., & Zillante, G. (2012). Exploring the management of sustainable construction at the programme level: a Chinese case study. Construction Management and Economics, 30(6), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.683200

Song, W. Y., Ming, X. G., & Wu, Z. Y. (2013). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. Journal of Engineering Design, 24(5), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2012.732994

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Vasiljević, M., Stojić, G., & Korica, S. (2017). Novel integrated multi-criteria model for supplier selection: case study construction company. Symmetry, 9(11), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9110279

Torra, V. (1996). Negation functions based semantics for ordered linguistic labels. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11(11), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098111X(199611)11:11<975::AID-INT5>3.0.CO;2-W

Wang, T. K., Zhang, Q., Chong, H. Y., & Wang, X. (2017). Integrated supplier selection framework in a resilient construction supply chain: an approach via analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and grey relational analysis (GRA). Sustainability, 9(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020289

Wen, Z., Liao, H. C., Zavadskas, E. K., & Al-BaIrakati A. (2019). Selection third-party logistics service providers in supply chain finance by a hesitant fuzzy linguistic combined compromise solution method. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32(1), 4033–4058. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1678502

Wu, X. L., & Liao, H. C. (2018). An approach to quality function deployment based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and ORESTE method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Information Fusion, 43, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.11.008

Wu, X. L., & Liao, H. C. (2019). A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(3), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.044

Xu, Z. S. (2005). Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega, 33(3), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.04.008

Yazdani, M., Wen, Z., Liao, H. C., Banaitis, A., & Turskis, Z. (2019a). A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(8), 858–874. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.11309

Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2019b). A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458

Yin, S., Li, B. Z., Dong, H. M., & Xing, Z. Y. (2017). A new dynamic multicriteria decision-making approach for green supplier selection in construction projects under time sequence. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7954784

Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning–I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5

Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2008). A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37(5–6), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0989-9

Zhang, X., Shen, L., & Wu, Y. (2011). Green strategy for gaining competitive advantage in housing development: a China study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2–3), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.005

Zhang, Y. X., Xu, Z. S., & Liao, H. C. (2017). A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 414, 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.06.006

Zhu, G. N., Hu, J., Qi, J., Gu, C. C., & Peng, Y. H. (2015). An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(3), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.010