Non-linear relationships between house size and price

    Shih-Tao Feng Affiliation
    ; Chien-Wen Peng Affiliation
    ; Chung-Hsien Yang Affiliation
    ; Pei-Wen Chen Affiliation


This study reexamines the relationship between house size and price by using the quantile regression model. Housing transactions data of the National Taipei University Special Zone in Taiwan are adopted, and the findings are as follows. First, the total price of a smaller housing unit will increase at a decreasing rate as its size increases. The decrease in marginal price might be due to the declining marginal utility of the property right. Secondly, the total price of a larger housing unit will increase at an increasing rate as its size increases. The size premium effect might be due to the influence of conspicuous consumption. Thirdly, housing with a lower square meter price is subject to greater price competitiveness in the market, and the price will increase at a decreasing rate as the size increases. Conversely, a housing unit with a higher square meter price will decrease at an increasing rate as its size increases. This might be due to the constraint imposed by the purchaser’s housing affordability. These findings clarify the nonlinear relationships between housing size and price, and provide very useful information for decision making of the developers, home purchasers, real estate appraisers, and the governments.

Keyword : housing price, house size, size premium effect, size discount effect, non-linear relationship

How to Cite
Feng, S.-T., Peng, C.-W., Yang, C.-H., & Chen, P.-W. (2021). Non-linear relationships between house size and price. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 25(3), 240-253.
Published in Issue
Apr 26, 2021
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Asabere, P. K., & Colwell, P. F. (1985). The relative lot size hypothesis: an empirical note. Urban Studies, 22(4), 355–357.

Asabere, P. K., & Huffman, F. E. (2013). The influence of relative size and home values. The Appraisal Journal, 3, 24–33.

Brownstone, D., & de Vany, A. (1991). Zoning, returns to scale, and the value of undeveloped land. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(4), 699–704.

Clauretie, T. M., & Li, H. (2019). Land values: size matters. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 58, 80–110.

Colwell, P. F., & Scheu, T. (1989). Optimal lot size and configuration. Journal of Urban Economics, 26, 90–109.

Colwell, P. F., & Munneke, H. J. (1999). Land price and land assembly in the CBD. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 18(2), 163–180.

Colwell, P. F., & Sirmans, C. F. (1993). A comment on zoning, returns to scale, and the value of undeveloped land. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75(4), 783–786.

Ecker, M. D., & Isakson, H. R. (2005). A unified convex-concave model of urban land values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(3), 265–277.

Hamilton, B. W. (1976). Capitalization of intrajurisdictional differences in local tax price. American Economic Review, 66(5), 743–753.

Haurin, D. (1988). The duration of marketing time of residential housing. Real Estate Economics, 16(4), 396–410.

Hui, E. C., Zhong, J., & Yu, K. (2016), Heterogeneity in spatial correlation and influential factors on property price of submarkets categorized by urban dwelling spaces. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(1), 04014047.

Lee, K. O., & Mori, M. (2016). Do conspicuous purchasers pay higher housing premium effects? Spatial and temporal variation in the United States. Real Estate Economics, 44(3), 726–763.

Lee, K. O., & Mori, M. (2019). Conspicuous consumption and household indebtedness. Real Estate Economics, 1–30.

Lee, H.-J., Chang, C.-O., & Hua, C.-C. (2006). The relationship between floor area and unit price across different residential types in the Taipei metropolitan area. Taiwan Land Studies, 9(1), 63–87 (in Chinese with English abstract).

Leguizamon, S. (2010). The influence of reference group house size on house price. Real Estate Economics, 38(3), 507–527.

Li, L., Cheung, D., & Sun, H. (2015). Does size matter? The dynamics of housing sizes and prices in Hong Kong. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(1), 109–124.

Lin, T., & Evans, A. W. (2000). The relationship between the price of land and size of plot when plots are small. Land Economics, 76(3), 386–394.

Ritter, M., Hüttel, S., Odening, M., & Seifert, S. (2020). Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture. Land Use Policy, 97, 104771.

Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic price and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.

Simlai, P. (2014). Estimation of variance of housing price using spatial conditional heteroskedasticity (SARCH) model with an application to Boston housing price data. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 54(1), 17–30.

Tabuchi, T. (1996). Quantity premia in real property markets. Land Economics, 72(2), 206–217. href= "

Thorsnes, P., & McMillen, D. P. (1998). Land value and parcel size: a semiparametric analysis. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17(3), 233–244.

Thorsnes, P. (2000). Internalizing neighborhood externalities: the effect of subdivision size and zoning on residential lot price. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(3), 397–418.

Turnbull, G. K., Dombrow, J., & Sirmans, C. F. (2006). Big housing, little housing: relative size and value. Real Estate Economics, 34(3), 439–456.

Veblen, T. (1899). Theory of the leisure class. MacMillan.

White, J. R. (1988). Large lot zoning and subdivision costs: a test. Journal of Urban Economics, 23, 370–384.

Zietz, J., Zietz, E. N., & Sirmans, G. S. (2008). Determinants of house prices: a quantile regression approach. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 37(4), 317–333.

Zahirovic-Herbert, V., & Chatterjee, S. (2011). What is the value of a name? Conspicuous consumption and housing price. Journal of Real Estate Research, 33(1), 105–125.