Share:


Attractive streetscape making pedestrians walk longer routes: the case of Kunitachi in Tokyo

    Marco Capitanio Affiliation

Abstract

There are manifold benefits of an increase in pedestrian movement, both in regard to societal and to personal wellbeing, and walkability is considered a major goal in urban design. However, it is methodologically complicated to ascertain to what extent streetscape features relating to comfort and pleasurability influence pedestrian behavior. Our hypothesis is that pedestrians, at the neighborhood scale, prefer more attractive routes even if they are longer than other possible and equally safe routes to reach a certain destination, independently of the presence of amenities. As a case study, we selected Kunitachi, an attractive city in Tokyo Prefecture, thus adding to the body of non-western empirical research on pedestrian preferences. By comparing two Space Syntax betweenness simulations of pedestrian routes – compulsory and optional – with an actual counting of pedestrian frequency on site, and with behavioral observations, we have established that simulations according to the principle of “shortest route” considerably differ from actual pedestrian frequency. Only by allowing a certain detour leeway, simulations showed a less pronounced discrepancy with reality. While further research is needed to confirm our results, this enquiry has demonstrated that, attractive streetscape features are part of the reason why local residents prefer pleasant and comfortable routes over shorter ones.

Keyword : walkability, attractive streetscape, pedestrian frequency, Space Syntax, betweenness, Kunitachi

How to Cite
Capitanio, M. (2019). Attractive streetscape making pedestrians walk longer routes: the case of Kunitachi in Tokyo. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 43(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.10359
Published in Issue
Oct 29, 2019
Abstract Views
87
PDF Downloads
67
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Adkins, A., Dill, J., Luhr, G., & Neal, M. (2012). Unpacking walkability: testing the influence of urban design features on perceptions of walking environment attractiveness. Journal of Urban Design, 17(4), 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2012.706365

Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 808-836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504274016

CABE. (2007). Paved with gold. The real value of good street design. London: Commission for architecture and built environment.

City Form Lab. (2015). Urban network analysis toolbox for rhinoceros 3D. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard GSD.

Ewing, R., Handy, S., Brownson, R. C., Clemente, O., & Winston, E. (2006). Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(1), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223

Foltête, J.-C., & Piombini, A. (2007). Urban layout, landscape features and pedestrian usage. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.12.001

Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. Washington: Island Press. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0

Hansen, G. (2014). Design for healthy communities: the potential of form-based codes to create walkable urban streets. Journal of Urban Design, 19(2), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.870466

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237

Jacobs, A. (1995). Great streets. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Madanipour, A. (2016). Social exclusion and space. In R. LeGates & F. Stout (Eds.), The city reader. London: Routledge.

Massengale, J., & Dover, V. (2013). Street design: the secret to great cities and towns. Hoboken: Wiley.

Miura, A. (2012). Tōkyō wa kōgai kara kieteiku! Shutoken kōrei-ka mikon-ka akiya chizu [From now on Tokyo is going to disappear starting from the suburbs! Mappings of aging, lack of marriages and vacant houses in Tokyo Metropolitan Area]. Kōbunsha.

Molasky, M. (2014). The American occupation and municipal identity: two towns in western Tokyo. In R. Caroli & D. Basosi (Eds.), Legacies of the U.S. occupation of Japan: appraisals after sixty years (pp. 66-79). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Offenhuber, D., & Ratti, C. (2014). Decoding the city. Basel: Birkhäuser. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783038213925

Osanai, T. (2012). Kunitachi Daigakumachi no Tanjō [The birth of Kunitachi as a University Town]. Tachikawa-shi, Keyaki Shuppan.

Radović, D. (2016). Measuring the non-measurable: on mapping subjectivities in urban research. City, Culture and Society, 7(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.10.003

Sevtsuk, A. (2016). City form lab. Retrieved from http://cityform.mit.edu/en

Takano, T., Nakamura, K., & Watanabe, M. (2002). Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable spaces. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 56, 913-918. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.12.913

Talen, E. (2002). Pedestrian access as a measure of urban quality. Planning Practice & Research, 17(3), 275-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/026974502200005634

Tsugawa, Y. (2014). Toshi keikan keisei no purosesu to randomāku no kinō – Tōkyō Kunitachi-shi o jirei ni [Urban landscape formation process and landmark functions: a case study of Kunitachi City in Tokyo]. Chiiki Seisaku Kenkyū 16(3), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474513517016