Share:


Integrationist triadic agendas for city research:cases from recent urban studies

Abstract

With more than 60% of the world population living in urban areas, cities are becoming at the centre of attention in academic institutions and government organizations. However, there appears to be a continuous fragmentation in the types of knowledge developed where issues or concerns are always addressed in isolation and many factors critical to a comprehensive understanding of cities towards creating better urban environments are oversimplified at best or ignored at worst. Therefore, the thrust of this paper is to demonstrate the thought processes involved in instigating frameworks, raising questions, and establishing objectives for responsive city research. It aims to present two triadic agendas that untangle the essential components of city research; the first is the Lefebvrian triadic conception on the production of space and the second is the triadic perspective of lifestyles theories for understanding housing developments, typologies, and choices. Contextually, while the theoretical underpinnings of these agendas are developed based on a body of knowledge generated in the context of the Western world, their conceptualisation is adapted to grasp and examine key unique particularities of selected emerging (and globalised) Arab cities in the Gulf region. Calling for the need for a trans-disciplinary thinking paradigm for city research, the two agendas adopt an integrationist approach that is amenable to understanding the urban realities of these cities.

Keyword : urban research, transdisciplinarity, emerging cities, production of space, lifestyle theories

How to Cite
Salama, A. M. (2019). Integrationist triadic agendas for city research:cases from recent urban studies. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 43(2), 148-157. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.11220
Published in Issue
Nov 22, 2019
Abstract Views
339
PDF Downloads
105
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Aerni, P. (2016). Coping with migration-induced urban growth: Addressing the blind spot of UN Habitat. Sustainability, 8(8), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080800

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (2001). Globalization. Duke University Press, Durham. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383215

Bardhan, A., & Kroll, C. A. (2007, 25-27 April). Globalization and the real estate industry: Issues, implications, and opportunities, in The Sloan Industry Studies Annual Conference. Cambridge.

Benedikter, R. (2012). Lifestyles. In H. Anheier & M. Juergens-Meyer (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of global studies (pp. 1076-1080). Sage Publications, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218557.n335

Bourdieu, P. (1987). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Brenner, N., & Keil, R. (Eds.). (2006). The global cities reader. Routledge, London.

Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago school of sociology: Institutionalization, diversity and the rise of sociological research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Castells, M. (1972). La Question Urbaine. Maspero, Paris.

Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban regional process. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Cohen, R. (1981). The new international division of labour, multinational corporations and urban hierarchy. In M. Dear & A. Scott (Eds.), Urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society (pp. 287-317). Methuen, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351068000-12

Doucet, I., & Janssens, N. (2011). Transdisciplinarity, hybridization of knowledge production and space related research. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism (pp. 1-14). Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0104-5_1

Douglas, M. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. Cresset Press, London.

Douglas, M. (2006). A history of grid and group cultural theory. In Semioticon 2006. Retrieved from http://semioticon.com/sio/files/douglas-et-al/douglas1.pdf?lbisphpreq=1&file=douglas-et-al/douglas1.pdf

Dunnin-Woyseth, H., & Nielsen, M. (2004). Discussing transdisciplinarity: Making professions and the new mode of knowledge production. The Nordic Reader, Oslo School of Architecture, Oslo.

Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Perseus Book Group, New York.

Freeman, L. (1998). Interpreting the dynamics of public housing: Cultural and rational choice explanations. Housing Policy Debate, 9(2), 323-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1998.9521297

Friedman, J., & Wolff, G. (1982). World city formation: An agenda for research and action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6(1), 309-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1982.tb00384.x

Graham, E., & Sabater, A. (2015). Population change and housing across the life course: Demographic perspectives, methodological Challenges and emerging Issues. Working Paper Series (64). ESRC Centre for Population Change.

Gurran, N., Milligan, V., Baker, D., & Bugg, L. B. (2007). International practice in planning for affordable housing: Lessons for Australia. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Melbourne.

Hall, P. (2002). Cities of tomorrow. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

Harvey, D. (1969). Explanation in geography. Edward Arnold, London.

Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Edward Arnold, London.

Hojrup, T. (2003). State, culture, and life modes: The foundations of life mode analysis. Ashgate, Farnham.

Hutchison, R. (2010). Chicago school of urban sociology. In R. Hutchison (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of urban studies (pp. 127-130). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412971973.n46

Lawrence, R., & Depres, C. (2004). Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.005

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell, Oxford.

Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Marcus, C. C. (1997). House as a mirror of self. Conari Press, Berkeley.

Merrifield, A. (2006). Henri Lefebvre: A critical introduction. Routledge, London.

Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Towards a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1086/226311

Narwold, A., & Sandy, J. (2010). Valuing housing stock diversity. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 3(1), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538271011027078

Newmark, N. L., & Thompson, P. J. (1977). Self, space and shelter. Canfield Press, San Francisco.

Walters, G. (2006). Lifestyle theory: Past, present and future. Nova Science Publishers, New York.

Pohl, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2008). Core terms in transdisciplinary research. In G. Hirsch Hadorn et al. (Eds.), Handbook of transdsiciplinary research (pp. 427-432). Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3_28

Salama, A. M. (2006). A lifestyle theories approach for affordable housing research in Saudi Arabia. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 11(1), 67-76.

Salama, A. M. (2011). Trans-disciplinary knowledge for affordable housing. Open House International, 36(3), 7-15.

Salama, A. M. (2015). A socio-anthropological approach for exploring housing culture in contemporary Cairo. In A. Picone (Ed.), Culture Mediterranee Dell’abitare: Mediterranean housing cultures. Inhabiting the Future Book Series. Collana, Napoli, 128-137.

Salama, A. M., & Wiedmann, F. (2013). Demystifying Doha: on architecture and urbanism of an emerging city. Routledge, London.

Salama, A. M., Wiedmann, F., & Ibrahim, H. G. (2017). Lifestyle trends and housing typologies in emerging multicultural cities. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 41(4), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2017.1415773

Salama, A. M., Wiedmann, F., Thierstein, A., & Al Ghatam, W. (2016). Knowledge economy as an initiator of sustainable urbanism in emerging metropolises: The case of Doha, Qatar. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 10(1), 274-324. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v10i1.927

Sassen, S. (1991). The Global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Shields, R. (1999). Lefebvre, love and struggle: Spatial dialectics. Routledge, London.

Taylor, P. J. (2003). World city network: A global urban analysis. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203634059

Turner, J. (1988). The mixed legacy of the Chicago school of sociology. Sociological Perspectives, 31(3), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389202

Veblen, T. (2009). The theory of the leisure class. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wiedmann, F., Salama, A. M., & Mirincheva, V. (2014). Sustainable urban qualities in the emerging city of Doha. Journal of Urbanism, 7(1), 62-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2013.870088

Wiedmann, F., Salama, A. M., Ibrahim, H. G., & Mirincheva, V. (2019). New housing patters and spatial fragmentation in Gulf cities. Journal of Urbanism, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2019.1626263