Share:


(Re)framing spatiality as a socio-cultural paradigm: examining the Iranian housing culture and processes

    Lakshmi Rajendran   Affiliation
    ; Fariba Molki Affiliation
    ; Sara Mahdizadeh   Affiliation
    ; Asma Mehan   Affiliation

Abstract

With rapid changes in urban living today, peoples’ behavioural patterns and spatial practices undergo a constant process of adaptation and negotiation. Using “house” as a laboratory and everyday life and spatial relations of residents as a framework of analysis, the paper examines the spatial planning concepts in traditional and contemporary Iranian architecture and the associated socio-cultural practices. Discussions are drawn upon from a pilot study conducted in the city of Kerman, to investigate ways in which contemporary housing solutions can better cater to the continually changing socio-cultural lifestyles of residents. Data collection for the study involved a series of participatory workshops and employed creative visual research methods, participant observation and semi structured interviews to examine the interlacing of everyday socio-spatial relations and changing perception of identity, belonging, socio-cultural and religious values and conflict. The inferences from the study showcases the emerging social and cultural needs and practices of people manifested through the complex relationship between residents, the places in which they live, and its spatial planning and organisation. For a better understanding of this complex relationship, the paper argues the need for resituating spatiality as a socio-cultural paradigm.

Keyword : spatial, socio-cultural, housing, planning, architecture, Iran

How to Cite
Rajendran, L., Molki, F., Mahdizadeh, S., & Mehan, A. (2021). (Re)framing spatiality as a socio-cultural paradigm: examining the Iranian housing culture and processes. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 45(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2021.14032
Published in Issue
Jun 14, 2021
Abstract Views
178
PDF Downloads
66
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Altman, I. (1992). A transactional perspective on transitions to new environments. Environment and Behavior, 24(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916592242008

Bachelard, G. (2014). The poetics of space. Penguin Books.

Bani-Masoud, A. (2020). Contemporary architecture in Iran: from 1925 to the present. Independently Published.

Birdwell-Pheasant, D., & Lawrence-Züniga, D. (1999). House life: space, place and family in Europe. Routledge.

Casey, E. (1998). The fate of place: A philosophical history (new ed.). University of California Press.

Cuthberted, A. R. (2003). Designing cities: critical readings in urban design. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Dehkhoda, A. A. (Ed.). (1940). Loghatname Dehkhoda [Dehkhoda dictionary]. College of Science and Literature, University of Tehran Publishing.

Eskandari, P. (2011). Analysis of traditional Iranian houses of Kashan, Iran in terms of space organization and access design. Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU).

Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048

Griffiths, S., & von Lünen, A. (2016). Spatial cultures: towards a new social morphology of cities past and present. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315610269

Hanson, J. (2003). Decoding homes and houses. Cambridge University Press.

Heidegger, M. (2001). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1971)

Johnson, M. H. (1993). Housing culture: traditional architecture in an English landscape. UCL Press, Routledge.

Kiet, A. (2011). Arab culture and urban form. Focus, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.15368/focus.2011v8n1.4

Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture a critical review of concepts and definitions. In Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University (Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 3–217). The Museum.

Lane, B. M. (2006). Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture. Routledge.

Leung, A. K.-y., Chiu, C.-y., & Hong, Y.-y. (2011). Cultural processes: A social psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779374

Malpas, J. (2012). Putting space in place: philosophical topography and relational geography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(2), 226–242.
https://doi.org/10.1068/d20810

Marcus, C. C. (2006). House as a mirror of self: Exploring the deeper meaning of home. Nicolas-Hays, Inc.

Mehan, A. (2017a). Manifestation of modernity in Iranian public squares: Baharestan square (1826–1978). International Journal of Heritage Architecture, 1(3), 411–420.
https://doi.org/10.2495/HA-V1-N3-411-420

Mehan, A. (2017b). “Tabula Rasa” planning: creative destruction and building a new urban identity in Tehran. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 41(3), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2017.1355277

Memarian, G. H. (1998). House typology in Iran (with special reference to Shiraz) [PhD thesis]. The University of Manchester.

Memarian, G. H., & Brown, F. (2006). The shared characteristics of Iranian and Arab courtyard houses. In B. Edwards, M. Sibley, M. Hakmi, & P. Land (Eds.), Courtyard housing: past, present and future (pp. 21–30). Taylor & Francis.

Memarian, G. H., & Sadoughi, A. (2011). Application of access graphs and home culture: examining factors relative to climate and privacy in Iranian houses. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(30), 6350–6363. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE11.1620

Miller, D. (2001). Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Berg.

Mirmoghtadaee, M. (2009). Process of housing transformation in Iran. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 14(1), 69–80.

Netto, V. M. (2017). ‘The social fabric of cities’: a tripartite approach to cities as systems of interaction. Area Development and Policy, 2(2), 130–153.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2017.1315540

Nijst, A. (1973). Living on the edge of the Sahara: a study of traditional forms of habitation and types of settlement in Morocco. Government Publishing Office.

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1979). Genius Loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.

Pirnia, M. K. (1991). Introduction to Iranian Islamic architecture Tehran. Iran University of Science and Technology.

Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (1970a). Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (1970b). The influence of the physical environment on behavior: some basic assumptions. In Environmental psychology: man and his physical setting (pp. 27–36). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Pumain, D. (2004). Spatiality. Retrieved 29 August, 2018, from http://www.hypergeo.eu/spip.php?article181#

Rapoport, A. (2007). The nature of the courtyard house: a conceptual analysis. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 18(2), 57–72.

Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Tonkiss, F. (2013). Cities by design: the social life of urban form. Polity.