Share:


Expanding depth and meaning within urban design processes through the application of complexity and evolutionary theories

    Marta Miguel Affiliation
    ; Richard Laing   Affiliation
    ; Marianthi Leon   Affiliation
    ; Seaton Baxter Affiliation

Abstract

Previous research has established the value of regarding cities as complex systems, and as systems which will evolve over time. The research reported in this paper concerns the development of an approach to urban design and management which recognises the complexities of change resulting from design-led urban interventions. The research commenced with a study of urban design and urban management processes, and the manner in which they have been studied in an academic context. The system aims to guide the processes of urban design so that it can be implemented within a cyclical process of evaluation and application. The system aids communication across design teams and improves clarity within the design process for the designers themselves. The specific system also aspires to interconnect theory with practice, while supporting designers to be inclusive and holistic. The paper describes a case study where the framework was applied within an academic setting, related to real urban environments in Singapore. It validates the model’s ability to guide students through the design process, give depth to their analysis of urban systems and meaning to their designs. Action research was implemented, to reflect the need for a “practice-changing practice” methodology, that supports a greater understanding of the relationship between theory and practice.

Keyword : urban, management, evolution, collaboration, education

How to Cite
Miguel, M., Laing, R., Leon, M., & Baxter, S. (2021). Expanding depth and meaning within urban design processes through the application of complexity and evolutionary theories. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 45(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2021.14772
Published in Issue
Aug 26, 2021
Abstract Views
125
PDF Downloads
86
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press.

Allen, P. M. (1981). The evolutionary paradigm of dissipative structures. In E. Jantch (Ed.), The evolutionary vision: towards a unifying paradigm of physical, biological and sociocultural evolution (pp. 25–71). Westview Press.

Allen, P. M. (1997). Cities and regions as self-organising systems: models of complexity. Taylor & Francis.

Allen, P. M. (2012). Cities: the visible expression of co-evolving complexity. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age (pp. 67–127).
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_5

Bak, P. (1996). How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5426-1

Batty, M., & Marshall, S. (2009). Centenary paper: The evolution of cities: Geddes, Abercrombie and the new physicalism. Town Planning Review, 80(6), 551–574.
https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.12

Batty, M., & Marshall, S. (2012). The origins of complexity theory in cities and planning. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age (pp. 21–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_3

Bina, O., Balula, L., Varanda, M., & Fokdal, J. (2016). Urban studies and the challenge of embedding sustainability: A review of international master programmes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 330–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.034

Boden, M. (1991). The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. Basic Books.

Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/0471746096

Chan, D. (1998). The sconceptualisation and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modelling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1, 421–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819814004

Cross, N. (2008). Engineering design methods: strategies for product design (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68064

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. OUP.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.

Geddes, P. (1915, 1949). Cities in evolution (new and rev. ed.). William and Norgate.

Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics, advanced topics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88338-5

Haken, H., Wunderlin, A., & Yigitbasi, S. (1995). An introduction to cybernetics. Open Systems & Information Dynamics, 3(1), 97–130. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228811

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. Sage.

Hodgson, A. (2011). Ready for anything. Triarchy Press.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Penguin Books.

Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463–474.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790903093284

Kemmis, S. (2014). The action research planner: doing critical participatory action research (R. McTaggart & R. Nixon, Eds.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Khan, A. Z., Vandevyvere, H., & Allacker, K. (2013). Design for the ecological age: rethinking the role of sustainability in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 67(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2013.817155

Krick, E. (1969). An introduction to engineering and engineering design. John Wiley & Sons.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.

Leon, M., & Laing, R. (2020). A concept design stages protocol to support collaborative processes in architecture, engineering and construction projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-10-2020-0399

Li, N., Chan, D., Mao, Q., Hsu, K., & Fu, Z. (2018). Urban sustainability education: Challenges and pedagogical experiments. Habitat International, 71, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.012

Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books.

Marshall, S. (2009). Cities design and evolution. Routledge.

Marshall, S., & Batty, M. (2009). From Darwinism to planning, through Geddes and back. Town & Country Planning, 78, 462–464.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education (Revised and expanded from “Case study research in education”). Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. McGraw-Hill.

Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K. H. (2007). Engineering design: a systematic approach (3rd ed.). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2

Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: the theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36(1), 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352110

Portugali, J. (2008). Learning from paradoxes about prediction and planning in selforganising cities. Planning Theory, 7(3), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208094823

Portugali, J. (2012). Complexity theories of cities: achievements, criticism and potentials. In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come to age. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_4

Prigogine, I., & Nicolis, G. (1977). Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems: from dissipative structures to order through fluctuations. John Wiley & Sons.

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Salingaros, N. A. (2000). The structure of pattern languages. Architectural Research Quarterly, 4(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135500002591

Schon, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3–4), 181–201.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press.

Spencer, D. (2009). Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Journal of Architecture, 14(3), 446–450.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360903028044

Tong, C., & Sriram, D. (1992). Chapter 1: Introduction. In C. Tong (Ed.), Artificial intelligence in engineering design. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-660562-4.50008-X

Valkenburg, R., & Dorst, K. (2008). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8

van Dooren, E., Boshuizen, E., van Merriënboer, J., Asselbergs, T., & van Dorst, M. (2014). Making explicit in design education: generic elements in the design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24, 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9246-8

Walliman, N. (2006). Social research methods. Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209939

Wellington, J. (2015). Education research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Bloomsbury Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474236966

Wilson, D. S. (2011). The neighborhood project. Little, Brown and Company.