Normative approaches in making cultural quarters and assessment of creative industry parks in Shanghai

    Jane Zheng Affiliation


This article aims to synthesize the principles of making cultural quarters in literature and test their applicability in creative industry parks in the Chinese context. Extant literature on creative industry parks in China lacks an evaluation instrument for evaluating the performance of creative industry parks. This research reviews normative theories regarding cultural quarter making and identifies three approaches, namely the area-based approach in cultural quarter design, architectural design principles (tailored to cultural quarters), and a comprehensive framework that comprises three dimensions, i.e., activity, built form, and meaning. These normative approaches were applied to evaluate the quality of creative industry parks that emerged in Shanghai in the recent decade. Qualitative research methods, including on-site reconnaissance, observation, and interview, were adopted. The former two approaches revealed good design practices in Shanghai’s creative industry parks. A systematic evaluation of the said parks through a comparative study suggests significant disparity in the dimensions of architectural design and place making. Additionally, indicators of state support for micro and small creative industry companies and arts funding are less applicable in Shanghai. These findings reveal the role of the private sector in constructing a diversified creative environment which was previously enshrined by the state. With these outcomes, this research partially endorses the value of the normative theories to guide the practice of making and evaluating cultural quarters in the Chinese context.

Keyword : cultural quarter, creative industry park, Shanghai, historic building reuse, place making, cultural venues

How to Cite
Zheng, J. (2018). Normative approaches in making cultural quarters and assessment of creative industry parks in Shanghai. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 42(2), 134-154.
Published in Issue
Nov 16, 2018
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Bentley, I. (1985). Responsive environments: a manual for designers. London: Architectural Press.

Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.

Cartier, C. (2001). “Zone fever,” the arable land debate, and real estate speculation: China’s evolving land use regime and its geographical contradictions. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(28), 445-469.

Comedia, F., & Gulbenkian, C. (1991). Out of hours: a study of economic, social and cultural life in twelve town centres in the UK. London: Comedia and Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

Common, R. (2000). The East Asia region: Do public-private partnerships make sense? In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), Public-private partnerships: theory and practice in international perspective (pp. 134-148). London, New York: Routledge.

Duan, W., & Cui, H. (2006). Gongneng zhihuan: Deng Kunyan de Shanghai binjiang chuangyichanye yuan [Funcational update: The Waterfront Creative Park designed by Deng Kunyan in Shanghai]. Time Architecture, 2007(1), 62-67 (in Chinese).

Doratli, N. (2005). Revitalizing historic urban wuarters: a model for determining the most relevant strategic approach. European Planning Studies, 13(5), 749-772.

Edelman, S., & Gaman, J. K. (2004). What not to build: do’s and don’ts of exterior home design. N. J.: Creative Homeowner.

Gong, T. (2006). Corruption and local governance: the double identity of Chinese local governments in market reform. The Pacific Review, 19(1), 95-102.

Historic and Cultural City Research Centre. (2005). The Shanghai Taikang Road Historic Area Conservation and Reuse Concept Plan (Unpublished document, in Chinese). Tongji University.

Hsing, Y. T. (2006). Global capital and local land in China’s urban real estate development. In F. L. Wu (Ed.), Globalization and the Chinese city (pp. 167-189). London, New York: Routledge.

Huang, J. (2005, June 3). Shanghai chuangyi cangku fangzu gaochu zhongdang xiezilou 30% [Rent charges of creative warehouses in Shanghai exceed that of the medium level office buildings by 30%]. Guoji Jinrong Bao [International Finance], 1-10 (in Chinese).

Jacobs, J. (1960). The death and life of great American cities. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Keane, M. (2007). Created in China: the great new leap forward. London, New York: Routledge.

Keane, M. (2011). China’s new creative clusters: Governance human capital and regional investment. London, New York: Routledge.

Kong, L., Gibson, C., Khoo, L. M., & Semple, A. L. (2006). Knowledges of the creative economy: Towards a relational geography of diffusion and adaptation in Asia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 47(2), 174-194.

Lin, G. C. S. (2007). Reproducing spaces of Chinese urbanization: New city-based and land-centered urban transformation. Urban Studies, 44(9), 1827-1855.

Lin, N. (1995). Local market socialism: local corporatism in action in rural China. Theory and Society, 24, 301-354.

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Montgomery, J. (2003). Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. Part 1: conceptualising cultural quarters. Planning, Practice & Research, 18(4), 293-306.

Montgomery, J. (2004). Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. Part 2: a review of four cultural quarters in the UK, Ireland and Australia. Planning, Practice & Research, 19(1), 3-31.

O’Connor, J., & Gu, X. (2014). Creative industry clusters in Shanghai: A success story? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(1), 1-20.

Olds, K. (2001). Globalization and urban change, capital, culture, and pacific Rim mega-projects. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Roodhouse, S. (2006). Cultural quarters: principles and practice. Bristol, UK, Portland.

Rogers, R. (1988, November). Brief in the future is rooted in the memory of the past. Royal Society of Arts Journal, 873-884.

Tang, B. S., & Liu, S. C. (2001, June 15-17). Curses of arrogance: Why have Hong Kong developers been outperformed by local competitors in Mainland China? Paper presented at RC21 Conference of International Sociological Association Research Committee on Urban and Regional Development. Amsterdam, Holland.

Tiesdell, S., Oc, T., & Heath, T. (1996). Revitalizing historic urban quarters. London: Butterworth-Architecture.

Xue, Q. L. C., & Peng, N. (2006, June). An alternative modernity and metropolitan fantasy: an analysis of space of architecture by Japanese architects since 1980. Time Architecture, 124-129 (in Chinese).

Zhang, X. Q. (2005). Development of the Chinese housing market. In C. R. Ding, & Y. Song (Eds.), Emerging land and housing markets in China (pp. 183-231). Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Zheng, J. (2011). Creative industry cluster and the entrepreneurial city of Shanghai. Urban Studies, 48(16), 3553-3574.

Zheng, J. (2010). The entrepreneurial state in “creative industry cluster development in Shanghai. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 143-170.

Zheng, J., & Chan, R. (2013). A property-led approach to cluster development: “Creative industry clusters” and creative industry networks in Shanghai. Town Planning Review, 84(5), 581-608.

Zheng, J., & Chan, R. (2014). The impact of “creative industry clusters” on cultural and creative industry development in Shanghai. City, Culture and Society, 5(1), 9-22.

Zhu, J. M. (2004). From land use right to land development right: institutional change in China’s urban development. Urban Studies, 41(7), 1249-1267.