Assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility performance and state promotion policies: a case study of The Baltic States

    Jintao Lu   Affiliation
    ; Licheng Ren Affiliation
    ; Chong Zhang Affiliation
    ; Mengshang Liang Affiliation
    ; Josef Abrhám Affiliation
    ; Justas Streimikis   Affiliation


The development of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiative is formed by several cultural, economic, social, political and institutional factors which have an impact on setting the priorities and advancement of CSR practices. The aim of this study is to assess CSR performance at the country level. In order to achieve this aim, the main drivers and barriers of CSR initiatives were identified and systematized based on literature review. The policies to address these barriers were analysed and discussed. The framework for the assessment of CSR performance was developed based on the analysis and assessment of the quality of political-regulatory, economic and social environment, implemented public policies to promote CSR and successes that were achieved by countries in implementing recommendations for public policy advancement. The indicators from Venture Capital and Private Equity Country Attractiveness Index, CSR policies areas reviews and EU recommendations for the improvement of public policies linked to the CSR were applied for assessing the CSR performance. The empirical analysis and the assessment of CSR performance in the Baltic States was performed based on the developed framework and policy recommendations that were developed for other countries, taking into account the priorities of “The Belt and Road” project that was initiated by the Chinese government and aiming at sustainable development and global risk mitigation.

Keyword : Corporate Social Responsibility, state policies, governance indicators, policy performance index, The Baltic States

How to Cite
Lu, J. ., Ren, L. ., Zhang, C. ., Liang, M. ., Abrhám, J. ., & Streimikis, J. . (2020). Assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility performance and state promotion policies: a case study of The Baltic States. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(4), 1203-1224.
Published in Issue
Jun 26, 2020
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Acciaro, M. (2014). A real option application to investment in low-sulphur maritime transport. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 6(2), 189–212.

Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 391–407.

Alemagi, D., Oben, P. M., & Ertel, J. (2006). Implementing environmental management systems in industries along the Atlantic coast of Cameroon: Drivers, benefits and barriers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(4), 221–232.

Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.

Brammall, R. (2012). How green are shipping companies? Southampton Solent University.

Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

Chen, J., Huang, J., Zheng, L., & Zhang, C. (2019). An empirical analysis of telecommunication infrastructure promoting the scale of international service trade: Based on the panel data of countries along the belt and road. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18(2), 124–139.

Coady, L., Lister, J., Strandberg, C., & Ota, Y. (2013). The role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the international shipping sector.

Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. (2018). Does institutional context affect CSR disclosure? A study on Eurostoxx 50. Sustainability, 10(8), 1–20.

Crilly, D., Hansen, M., & Zollo, M. (2016). The grammar of decoupling: Stakeholder heterogeneity and firm decoupling of sustainability practices. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 705–729.

Desai, V. M. (2016). Under the radar: Regulatory collaborations and their selective use to facilitate organizational compliance. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 636–657.

Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.

Dixon, T., Colantonio, A., Shiers, D., Reed, R., Wilkinson, S., & Gallimore, P. (2008). A green profession? A global survey of RICS members and their engagement with the sustainability agenda. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 26(6), 460–481.

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Kim, Y. (2017). Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal International Business Studies, 48(3), 360–385.

Elbassiouny, D., & Elbassiouny, N. (2019). Diversity, corporate governance and CSR reporting: A comparative analysis between top-listed firms in Egypt, Germany and the USA. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 116–136.

Emezi, C. N. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: A strategic tool to achieve corporate objective. Responsibility and Sustainability, 2(3), 43–56.

Epstein, M. J., Buhovac, A. R., Elkington, J., & Leonard, H. B. D. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environment and economic impacts (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

European Commission. (2014). Corporate social responsibility national public policies in the European union-compendium 2014.

European Commission. (2019a). 2019 European semester: Assessment of progress on structural reforms, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances, and results of in-depth reviews under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011, Estonia.

European Commission. (2019b). 2019 European semester: Assessment of progress on structural reforms, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances, and results of in-depth reviews under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011, Latvia.

European Commission. (2019c). 2019 European Semester: Assessment of progress on structural reforms, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances, and results of in-depth reviews under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011, Lithuania.

Faisal, M. N. (2010). Analysing the barriers to corporate social responsibility in supply chains: An interpretive structural modelling approach. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 13(3), 179–195.

Forbes. (2011). No, Consumers will Not pay more for green.

Ganushchak-Efimenko, L., Shcherbak, V., & Nifatova, O. (2018). Assessing the effects of socially responsible strategic partnerships on building brand equity of integrated business structures in Ukraine. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(4), 715–730.

García-Sánchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frias-Aceituno, J. V. (2016). Impact of the institutional macro context on the voluntary disclosure of CSR information. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 15–35.

George, H., & Antonis, S. (2016). Cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility: A cross-country analysis. University of the Aegean.

Gligor-Cimpoieru, D. C., & Munteanu, V. P. (2015). CSR benefits and costs in a strategic approach. Annals of the University of Craiova-Economic Sciences Series, 1(43), 96–105.

Groh, A., Liechtenstein, H., Lieser, K., & Biesinger, M. (2018). The venture capital and private equity country attractiveness index.

Haddock-Fraser, J., & Fraser, I. (2008). Assessing corporate environmental reporting motivations: Differences between “close to market” and “business -to-business” companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(3), 140–155.

Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2012). Financial constraints on corporate goodness (NBER Working Paper No. 18476).

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834–864.

Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394.

Jakusonoka, I., & Zarina, K. (2018). Attractiveness of Latvian, Lithuanian and Estonian venture capital markets for international investors. Science and Studies of Accounting and Finance: Problems and Perspectives, 12(1), 20–27.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241–256.

Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3–14), 271–284.

Krajnakova, E., Navickas, V., & Kontautiene, R. (2018). Effect of macroeconomic business environment on the development of corporate social responsibility in Baltic Countries and Slovakia. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(3), 477–492.

Kurucz, E. C., Colbert, B. A., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press.

Laudal, T. (2011). Drivers and barriers of CSR and the size and internationalization of firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 234–256.

Lu, J., Ren, L., He, Y., Lin, W., & Streimikis, J. (2019b). Linking corporate social responsibility with reputation and brand of the firm. Amfiteatru Economic, 21(51), 442–460.

Lu, J., Ren, L., Lin, W., He, Y., & Streimikis, J. (2019a). Policies to promote Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and assessment of CSR impacts. Ekonomie a Management, 22(1), 82–98.

Lu, J., Ren, L., Qiao, J., He, Y., & Lin, W. (2019c). Female executives and corporate social responsibility performance: A dual perspective of differences in institutional environment and heterogeneity of foreign experience. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18(2), 174–196.

Mbogoh, E., & Ogutu, P. M. (2017). Challenges of implementing corporate social responsibility strategies by commercial banks in Kenya. Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 2(2), 1–16.

Pawlik, T., Gaffron, P., & Drewes, P. A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in maritime logistics. In D. Song & P. Panayides (Eds.), Maritime logistics (pp. 205–226). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Pimentel, L. V., Branca, A. S., & Catalao-Lopes, M. (2016). International comparisons of corporate social responsibility.

Pruzan-Jorgensen, P. M., & Farrag, A. (2010). Sustainability trends in the container shipping industry: A future trends research summary.

Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045–1061.

Shen, L., Govindan, K., & Shankar, M. (2015). Evaluation of barriers of corporate social responsibility using an analytical hierarchy process under a fuzzy environment – A textile case. Sustainability, 7(3), 3493–3514.

Sinha, S. N., & Chaudhari, T. (2018). Impact of CSR on learning outcomes. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(6), 1026–1041.

Sowden, P., & Sinha, S. (2005). Promoting health and safety as a key goal of the corporate social responsibility agenda.

Steurer, R. (2010). The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Characterising public policies on CSR in Europe. Policy Sciences, 43(1), 49–72.

Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, A., & Margula, S. (2012). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments, and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 19(4), 206–227.

Szwajca, D. (2018). Relationship between corporate image and corporate reputation in Polish banking sector. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(3), 493–509.

The Boston Consultant Group. (2011). Charting a new course: restoring profitability to container shipping.

West, B., Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2015). Building employee relationships through corporate social responsibility: The moderating role of social cynicism and reward for application. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 295–322.

World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019.

Yuen, K. F., & Lim, J. M. (2016). Barriers to the implementation of strategic corporate social responsibility in shipping. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(1), 49–57.