Constructing an entrepreneurship project evaluation system using a hybrid model

    Qi-Gan Shao Affiliation
    ; James J. H. Liou Affiliation
    ; Sung-Shun Weng Affiliation
    ; Peiyao Su Affiliation


Due to the economic trends around the world and the strong support and guidance of relevant governments, the number of entrepreneurial projects has soared in China. It is necessary to construct a standard assessment system for entrepreneurial projects that is comprehensive and effective. This study extracted six dimensions and 23 criteria for evaluating entrepreneurial projects. This study applies the best and worst methods to obtain the weights of the dimensions and criteria. Then, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution method was used to evaluate the entrepreneurial projects in an entrepreneurial competition. The results show that team quality, the business model and entrepreneurship ability are the three most important dimensions for evaluating entrepreneurial projects. The improvement of the innovating ability, the training of the team and the value proposition are the three keys to successful implementation of the entrepreneurial projects.

Keyword : entrepreneurial project, project evaluation, hybrid model, MCDM, BWM, TOPSIS

How to Cite
Shao, Q.-G., Liou, J. J. H., Weng, S.-S., & Su, P. (2020). Constructing an entrepreneurship project evaluation system using a hybrid model. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(5), 1329-1349.
Published in Issue
Jul 24, 2020
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Allam, Z., & Dhunny, Z. A. (2019). On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities, 89, 80–91.

Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.

Aparicio, S., Urbano, D., & Gómez, D. (2016). The role of innovative entrepreneurship within Colombian business cycle scenarios: A system dynamics approach. Futures, 81, 130–147.

Åstebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012). Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41(4), 663–677.

Avlonitis, G. J., & Salavou, H. E. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 566–575.

Beltramello, A., Haie-Fayle, L., & Pilat, D. (2013). Why new business models matter for green growth. OECD Green Growth, 12, 1–108.

Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65(15), 42–56.

Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., & Reuve, M. D. (2019). Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommunications Policy, 43(9), 101828.

Chen, J., Chen, L., Chen, J. Y., & Xie, K. F. (2018). Mechanism and policy combination of technical sustainable entrepreneurship crowdfunding in China: A system dynamics analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177(10), 610–620.

Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spinoff companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.

Colombo, M. G., D’Adda, D., & Quas, A. (2019). The geography of venture capital and entrepreneurial ventures’ demand for external equity. Research Policy, 48(5), 1150–1170.

Cooke-Davis, T. (2002). The real success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185–190.

Cui, J., Sun, J. H., & Bell, R. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial mindset of college students in China: The mediating role of inspiration and the role of educational attributes. The International Journal of Management Education (in press).

Dahaj, A. S., & Cozzarin, B. P. (2019). Government venture capital and cross-border investment. Global Finance Journal, 41,113–127.

David, H. H., Edward, B. R., & Charles, E. E. (2007). Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: evidence from MIT. Research Policy, 36(5), 768–788.

Duan, Y. Q., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data evolution. Challenges and Research Agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 63–71.

Durmuşoğlu, Z. D. U. (2018). Assessment of techno-entrepreneurship projects by using Analytics Hierarchy Process (AHP). Technology in Society, 54, 41–46.

Fernhaber, S. A., & Stark, A. Y. (2019). Biomimicry: New insights for entrepreneurship scholarship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 12, e00137.

Finkle, T. A., & Deeds, D. (2001). Trends in the market for entrepreneurship faculty, 1989–1998. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(6), 613–630.

Fjeldstad, Ø. D., & Snow, C. C. (2018). Business models and organization design. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 32–39.

Frid, C. J., Wyman, D. M., & Gartner, W. B. (2016). Low-wealth entrepreneurs and access to external financing. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(4), 1–25.

Fuentelsaz, L., González, C., & Maicas, J. P. (2019). Formal institutions and opportunity entrepreneurship. The contingent role of informal institutions. Business Research Quarterly, 22(1), 5–24.

Gartner, W. B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 15–28.

Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2018). Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198(10), 401–416.

Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121(1), 23–31.

Gupta, H. (2018). Assessing organizations performance on the basis of GHRM practices using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Environment Management, 226, 201–216.

Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2017). Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152(20), 242–258.

Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2018). A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Science of the Total Environment, 633, 122–139.

Hienerth, C., Keinz, P., & Lettl, C. (2011). Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Planning, 44(5), 344–374.

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer.

Ika, L. A. (2009). Project success as a topic in project management journals. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6–19.

İrengün, O., & Arıkboğa, Ş. (2015). The effect of personality traits on social entrepreneurship intentions: A field research. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(3), 1186–1195.

Jensen, T. L. (2014). A holistic person perspective in measuring entrepreneurship education impact – Social entrepreneurship education at the Humanities. International Journal of Management Education, 12(3), 349–364.

Kalbar, P. P., Karmakar, S., & Asolekar, S. R. (2012). Technology assessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attribute decision-making. Technology in Society, 34(4), 295–302.

Khalili-Damghani, K., & Sadi-Nezhad, S. (2013). A hybrid fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making approach for sustainable project selection. Applied Soft Computing, 13(1), 339–352.

Kim, W., & Kim, M. (2015). Reference quality-based competitive market structure for innovation driven markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3), 284–296.

Kirkwood, J., Dwyer, K., & Gray, B. (2014). Students’ reflections on the value of an entrepreneurship education. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(3), 307–316.

Kumar, A., A, A., & Gupta, H. (2020). Evaluating green performance of the airports using hybrid BWM and VIKOR methodology. Tourism Management, 76, 103941.

Lee, Y. S., & Eesley, C. (2018). The persistence of entrepreneurship and innovative immigrants. Research Policy, 47(6), 1032–1044.

Liang, F. Q., Brunelli, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measure and thresholds. Omega, 96, 102175.

Lucia, C., De, Balena, P., & Melone, M. R. S. (2016). Policy, entrepreneurship, creativity and sustainability: The case of ‘Principi Attivi’ (‘Active Ingredients’) in Apulia Region (southern Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1461–1473.

Mandel, R., & Noyes, E. (2016). Survey of experiential entrepreneurship education offerings among top undergraduate entrepreneurship programs. Education + Training, 58(2), 164–178.

Mou, Q., Xu, Z. S., & Liao, H. C. (2016). An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making. Information Sciences, 374, 224–239.

Neumeyer, X., & Santos, S. C. (2018). Sustainable business models, venture typologies, and entrepreneurial ecosystems: A social network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4565–4579.

Patzelt, H., Behrens, J., Wolfe, M. T., & Shepherd, D. A. (2020). Perceived project transition support and employees’ assessments of entrepreneurial project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 35, 105887.

Paul, J., & Shrivatava, A. (2016). Do young managers in a developing country have stronger entrepreneurial intentions? Theory and debate. International Business Review, 25(6), 1197–1210.

Pickernell, D., Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., & Thomas, B. (2011). Graduate entrepreneurs are different: they access more resources? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(2), 183–202.

Pirzada, K., Wickramasinghe, D., & Moens, G. A. (2015). The role of entrepreneur in residence towards the students’entrepreneurial performance: A study of entrepreneurship learning process at Ciputra University, Indonesia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 972–976.

Razeghian, M., & Weber, T. A. (2019). Strategic durability with sharing markets. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 19, 79–96.

Rahimi, S., Hafezalkotob, A., Monavari, S. M. Hafezalkotob, A., & Rahimi, R. (2020). Sustainable landfill site selection for municipal solid waste based on a hybrid decision-making approach: Fuzzy group BWM-MULTIMOORA-GIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 11986.

Rego, A., Owens, B., Leal, S., Melo, A., Cunha, M. P., Goncalves, L., & Ribeiro, P. (2017). How leader humility helps teams to be humbler, psychologically stronger, and more effective: A moderated mediation model. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 649–658.

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.

Rezaei, J., Hemmes, A., & Tavasszy, L. (2017). Multi-criteria decision-making for complex bundling configurations in surface transportation of air freight. Journal of Air Transport Management, 61, 95–105.

Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2016). Measuring efficiency of university industry Ph.D. projects using best worst method. Scientometrics, 109, 1911–1938.

Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2013). Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1085–1097.

Soares, F. O., Sepúlveda, M. J., Monteiro, S., Lima, R. M., & Dinis-Carvalho, J. (2013). An integrated project of entrepreneurship and innovation in engineering education. Mechatronics, 23(8), 987–996.

Tsai, W. H., & Kuo, H. C. (2011). Entrepreneurship policy evaluation and decision analysis for SMEs. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8343–8351.

Wen, J. W., Yang, D., Feng, G. F., Dong, M. Y., & Chang, C. P. (2018). Venture capital and innovation in China: The non-linear evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 46, 148–162.

Yang, A., Li, Y. F., Liu, C. S., Li, J., Zhang, Y. Z., & Wang, J. H. (2019). Research on logistics supply chain of iron and steel enterprises based on block chain technology. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101, 635–645.

Yang, M., & Gabrielsson, P. (2017). Entrepreneurial marketing of international high-tech business-tobusiness new ventures: A decision-making process perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 147–160.

Yoon, K. P., & Kim, W. K. (2017). The behavioral TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 89, 266– 272.

You, X. S., Chen, T., & Yang, Q. (2016). Approach to multi-criteria group decision-making problems based on the best-worst-method and ELECTRE method. Symmetry, 8(9), 95.

Zhang, Z. L. (2018). Independent innovation promotes the continuous development of Chinese patents. National Bureau of Statistics.

Zhu, H. B., Zhang, K., & Ogbodo, U. S. (2017). Review on innovation and entrepreneurship education in Chinese universities during 2010–2015. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5939–5948.