Share:


The effects of public R&D subsidized loans on firms’ R&D outputs: evidence from China

    Yuchen Gao Affiliation
    ; Si Zhang Affiliation
    ; Yimei Hu Affiliation

Abstract

R&D subsidized loans (tiexi daikuan) is an effective market-driven solution to promote firms’ R&D outputs, including patent applications and new product sales, in China. However, empirical examination on the effects of subsidized loans is insufficient. Using a panel data of manufacturing firms of Jiangsu Province from 2010 to 2014, the study investigates the effects of R&D subsidized loans on firms’ R&D outputs in comparison to that of the direct R&D grants. The results show that R&D subsidized loan recipients significantly outperform those who only receive direct grants in terms of new product sales. Meanwhile, subsidized loans inhibit the recipients’ exploratory patent applications and discourage R&D activities with higher risks. This study contributes to R&D subsidy literature and extends the knowledge in the roles of different types of public sponsorships on firms’ innovation.

Keyword : R&D subsidy, subsidized loans, R&D outputs, China, innovation policy, exploratory patents

How to Cite
Gao, Y., Zhang, S., & Hu, Y. (2021). The effects of public R&D subsidized loans on firms’ R&D outputs: evidence from China. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(6), 1655-1678. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.14581
Published in Issue
Nov 19, 2021
Abstract Views
54
PDF Downloads
25
SM Downloads
10
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Ahuja, G., & Lampert, M. C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.176

Antonelli, C., & Crespi, F. (2013). The “Matthew effect” in R&D public subsidies: The Italian evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1523–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.008

Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400879762-024

Beck, M., Lopes-Bento, C., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2016). Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit? Research Policy, 45(4), 869–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.010

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676–706. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094913

Bertoni, F., Martí, J., & Reverte, C. (2019). The impact of government-supported participative loans on the growth of entrepreneurial ventures. Research Policy, 48(1), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.006

Boeing, P. (2016). The allocation and effectiveness of China’s R&D subsidies – Evidence from listed firms. Research Policy, 45(9), 1774–1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.007

Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008

Chapman, G., & Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2018). The effect of public support on senior manager attitudes to innovation. Technovation, 69, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.10.004

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Mustar, P. (2009). Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective. Research Policy, 38(10), 1517–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.003

David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6

Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.002

Dixit, A. (1997). Power of incentives in private versus public organizations. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 378–382.

Grau, T., Huo, M., & Neuhoff, K. (2012). Survey of photovoltaic industry and policy in Germany and China. Energy Policy, 51, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.082

Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2727442

Guan, J., & Yam, R. C. M. (2015). Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Research Policy, 44(1), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.001

Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45(6), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.002

Hall, B., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00085-2

Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130205

Hottenrott, H., & Richstein, R. (2020). Start-up subsidies: Does the policy instrument matter? Research Policy, 49(1), 103888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103888

Huang, Q., Jiang, M. S., & Miao, J. (2016). Effect of government subsidization on Chinese Industrial firms’ technological innovation efficiency: A stochastic frontier analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2015.1061590

Huergo, E., Trenado, M., & Ubierna, A. (2016). The impact of public support on firm propensity to engage in R&D: Spanish experience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113(B), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.011

Huergo, E., & Moreno, L. (2017). Subsidies or loans? Evaluating the impact of R&D support programmes. Research Policy, 46(7), 1198–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.006

Huergo, E., & Trenado, M. (2010). The application for and the awarding of low-interest credits to finance R&D projects. Review of Industrial Organization, 37(3), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-010-9263-7

Hussinger, K. (2008). R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semipara-metric two-step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(6), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1016

Jia, N., Huang, K. G., & Zhang, C. M. (2019). Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: An examination of state-owned enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0543

Jiang, G. G., Wang, D., & Chen, J. (2012). Market analysis and policy design of LED industry in Jiangsu Province. Advanced Materials Research, 512–515, 2705–2708. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.512-515.2705

Jourdan, J., & Kivleniece, I. (2017). Too much of a good thing? The dual effect of public sponsorship on organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.1007

Lach, S. (1995). Patents and productivity growth at the industry level: A first look. Economics Letters, 49(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(94)00618-C

Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E. J. (2018). On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2697

Liang, L. H. (2014, June). Analysis the new pattern of solar PV industry development in China and the enlightenment from Germany. In 2014 IEEE 9th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) (pp. 550–555). Hangzhou, China. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2014.6931225

Liu, X. L., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00132-3

Liu, X., Li, X., & Li, H. (2016). R&D subsidies and business R&D: Evidence from high-tech manufacturing firms in Jiangsu. China Economic Review, 41, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.08.003

Liu, X., Schwaag Serger, S., Tagscherer, U., & Chang, A. Y. (2017). Beyond catch-up – can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap? Science and Public Policy, 44(5), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw092

Manso, G. (2011). Motivating Innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823–1860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.x

Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1086/258177

Perez-Sebastian, F. (2015). Market failure, government inefficiency, and optimal R&D policy. Economics Letters, 128, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.01.012

Rangan, S., Samii, R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Constructive partnerships: When alliances between private firms and public actors can enable creative strategies. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 738–751. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318928

Tang, Y., Hu, X., Petti, C., & Thürer, M. (2019). Institutional incentives and pressures in Chinese manufacturing firms’ innovation. Management Decision, 58(5), 812–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2018-0933

Teachman, J. D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity: Measures of qualitative variation. Sociological Methods & Research, 8(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418000800305

Verona, G. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580445

Wang, Y., Li, J., & Furman, J. L. (2017). Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China’s Innofund program. Research Policy, 46(6), 1142–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.001

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207

Xin, F., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., & Du, X. (2016). Do the types of subsidies and firms’ heterogeneity affect the effectiveness of public R&D subsidies? Evidence from China’s Innofund programme. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 24(3), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2016.1256705

Zhao, B., & Ziedonis, R. (2020). State governments as financiers of technology startups: Evidence from Michigan’s R&D loan program. Research Policy, 49(4), 103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103926

Zheng, W., Singh, K., & Mitchell, W. (2015). Buffering and enabling: The impact of interlocking political ties on firm survival and sales growth. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1615–1636. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2301

Zhou, J., Li, J., Jiao, H., Qiu, H., & Liu, Z. (2020). The more funding the better? The moderating role of knowledge stock on the effects of different government-funded research projects on firm innovation in Chinese cultural and creative industries. Technovation, 92–93, 102059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.002

Zuniga-Vicente, J. A., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galan, J. I. (2014). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 36–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00738.x