Development of an advanced composite system form for constructability improvement through a Design for Six Sigma process

    Dongmin Lee   Affiliation
    ; Taehoon Kim Affiliation
    ; Dongyoun Lee Affiliation
    ; Hyunsu Lim Affiliation
    ; Hunhee Cho Affiliation
    ; Kyung-In Kang Affiliation


System form is widely used when constructing concrete buildings and structures because it has high productivity and good concrete casting quality compared with traditional hand-set form. However, from a worker’s perspective, system form is still very harsh to handle because of its heavy weight, noise generation, and use of releasing agent, and it also attenuates the productivity of system formwork. Therefore, this study proposes the use of an advanced composite material-based concrete form for workers using a Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) process to improve constructability of system formwork. User requirements are systematically reflected in the technical characteristics of concrete form, and innovative principles are scientifically organized through the DFSS process that mainly consists of quality function deployment and theory of creative problem-solving methods. The proposed composite form showed improved performance in deriving high-quality formwork and worker-friendly working conditions compared with previous system forms. Additionally, this study demonstrated how the DFSS will be a valuable tool for technology development and systematic decision-making in building construction.

Keyword : composite form, system concrete form, formwork, Design for Six Sigma (DFSS), quality function deployment (QFD), theory of creative problem-solving (TRIZ)

How to Cite
Lee, D. ., Kim, T. ., Lee, D. ., Lim, H. ., Cho, H. ., & Kang, K.-I. . (2020). Development of an advanced composite system form for constructability improvement through a Design for Six Sigma process. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(4), 364-379.
Published in Issue
Apr 9, 2020
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Akao, Y., King, B., & Mazur, G. H. (1990). Quality function deployment: Integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity Press.

Altshuller, G. (2002). 40 principles: TRIZ keys to innovation (Vol. 1). Technical Innovation Center, Inc.

Chang-Yeob, S., Hwan-Cheol, L., So-Hyun, P., Kyu-Man, C., & Chang-Taek, H. (2010). Productivity analysis of structural work for apartment building using AL-Form TT. Structure & Construction, 26(4), 113–121.

Cohen, L. (1995). Quality function deployment: How to make QFD work for you. Prentice Hall.

De Feo, J., & Bar-El, Z. (2002). Creating strategic change more efficiently with a new design for six sigma process. Journal of Change Management, 3(1), 60–80.

El-Sharkawy, A., Salahuddin, A., & Komarisky, B. (2014). Design for six sigma (DFSS) for optimization of automotive heat exchanger and underhood air temperature. SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, 7(2), 256–261.

Fazeli, M., Florez, J. P., & Simão, R. A. (2019). Improvement in adhesion of cellulose fibers to the thermoplastic starch matrix by plasma treatment modification. Composites Part B: Engineering, 163, 207–216.

Fey, V., & Rivin, E. (2005). Innovation on demand: New product development using TRIZ. Cambridge University Press.

Fung, R. Y. K., Chen, Y., Chen, L., & Tang, J. (2005). A fuzzy expected value-based goal programing model for product planning using quality function deployment. Engineering Optimization, 37(6), 633–645.

Geng, X., & Chu, X. (2012). A new importance-performance analysis approach for customer satisfaction evaluation supporting PSS design. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 1492–1502.

Hasenkamp, T. (2010). Engineering design for six sigma – A systematic approach. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 26(4), 317–324.

He, Z., & Ngee Goh, T. (2015). Enhancing the future impact of six sigma management. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 12(1), 83–92.

Hua, Z., Yang, J., Coulibaly, S., & Zhang, B. (2006). Integration TRIZ with problem-solving tools: A literature review from 1995 to 2006. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 1(1–2), 111–128.

Kim, T. (2013). Advanced system formwork and construction planning model for tall building construction (Doctoral dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

Kim, J. W., Yoo, S. K., & Kim, J. J. (2010). Efficiency analysis of Euro-form and aluminum-form. Structure & Construction, 10(1), 41–44.

Kim, T., Lim, H., Lee, U.-K., Cha, M., Cho, H., & Kang, K.-I. (2012). Advanced formwork method integrated with a layout planning model for tall building construction. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 39(11), 1173–1183.

Lee, D. (2019). Hybrid system formwork and AI-based construction planning model for high-rise building construction (Doctoral thesis). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

Lee, J., Lee, D., Cho, H., & Kang, K. I. (2017). Inhibiting factors and improvement plan of table formwork method in highrise building construction. In Proceedings of the 34th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2017) (pp. 571–576). Taipei, Taiwan.

Lee, D., Lim, H., Kim, T., Cho, H., & Kang, K. I. (2018). Advanced planning model of formwork layout for productivity improvement in high-rise building construction. Automation in Construction, 85, 232–240.

Liang, H. A. N. (2010). Aluminum formwork and its application in high-rise construction of Shenton way project in Singapore. Journal of Qingdao Technological University, 31(6).

Lim, H. S., Kim. T. H., Cho, H. H., & Kang, K. I. (2012). Design process for formwork system in tall building construction using quality function deployment and TRIZ. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(9), 173–182.

Lim, H., Kim, T., Cho, H., & Kang, K.-I. (2017). Simulationbased planning model for table formwork operation in tall building construction. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(1), 115–122.

Liverani, A., Caligiana, G., Frizziero, L., Francia, D., Donnici, G., & Dhaimini, K. (2019). Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) for additive manufacturing applied to an innovative multifunctional fan. International Journal of Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(1), 309–330.

Mayda, M., & Borklu, H. R. (2014). Development of an innovative conceptual design process by using Pahl and Beitz’s systematic design, TRIZ and QFD. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, 8(3), 13-00079.

MIK Materials. (2020).

Prasad, B. (1998). Review of QFD and related deployment techniques. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 17(3), 221–234.

Sheu, D. D., & Hou, C. T. (2013). TRIZ-based trimming for process-machine improvements: Slit-valve innovative redesign. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(3), 555–556.

Temponi, C., Yen, J., & Amos Tiao, W. (1999). House of quality: A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 117(2), 340–354.

Tursch, P., Goldmann, C., & Woll, R. (2015). Integration of TRIZ into quality function deployment. Management and Production Engineering Review, 6(2), 56–62.

Vivek. (2016). Advantages and disadvantages of Mivan shuttering.

Vinodh, S., Kamala, V., & Jayakrishna, K. (2014). Integration of ECQFD, TRIZ, and AHP for innovative and sustainable product development. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(11–12), 2758–2770.

Wang, F. K., Yeh, C. T., & Chu, T. P. (2016). Using the design for six sigma approach with TRIZ for new product development. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 98, 522–530.

Wang, Y. H., Lee, C. H., & Trappey, A. J. C. (2017). Service design blueprint approach incorporating TRIZ and service QFD for a meal ordering system: A case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 107, 388–400.

Yamashina, H., Ito, T., & Kawada, H. (2002). Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRIZ. International Journal of Production Research, 40(5), 1031–1050.

Yeh, C. H., Huang, J. C. Y., & Yu, C. K. (2011). Integration of four-phase QFD and TRIZ in product R&D: A notebook case study. Research in Engineering Design, 22(3), 125–141.