Share:


Comparison of multi layer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF) for construction cost estimation: the case of Turkey

    Savas Bayram Affiliation
    ; M. Emin Ocal Affiliation
    ; Emel Laptali Oral Affiliation
    ; C. Duran Atis Affiliation

Abstract

In Turkey, for the preliminary construction cost estimation, a notice, which is updated and published annu­ally by Turkish Ministry of the Environment and Urbanism, known as “unit area cost method” (UACM) is generally employed. However, it’s known that the costs obtained through this method in which only construction area is taken into consideration have significant differences from actual costs. The aim of this study is to compare the cost estimations obtained through “multi layer perceptron” (MLP) and “radial basis function” (RBF), which are commonly used artificial neural network (ANN) methods. The results of MLP and RBF were also compared with the results of UACM and the validity of UACM was interpreted. Dataobtained from 232 public construction projects, which completed between 2003 and 2011 in different regions of Turkey, were reviewed. Consequently, estimated costs obtained from RBF were found to be higher than the actual costs with a 0.28% variance, while the estimated costs obtained from MLP were higher than actual values with a 1.11% variance. The approximate costs obtained from UACM are higher than actual costs with a 28.73% variance. It was found that both ANN methods were showed better performance than the UACM but RBF was superior to MLP.


First published online: 24 Aug 2015

Keyword : actual cost, construction cost estimation, unit area cost method (UACM), artificial neural networks (ANN), multi layer perceptron (MLP), radial basis function (RBF)

How to Cite
Bayram, S., Ocal, M. E., Laptali Oral, E., & Atis, C. D. (2016). Comparison of multi layer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF) for construction cost estimation: the case of Turkey. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(4), 480-490. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.897988
Published in Issue
Apr 27, 2016
Abstract Views
104
PDF Downloads
246
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.