An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-fuzzy ANP model for evaluating construction projects by considering interrelationships among risk factors


Construction projects are associated with a number of uncertainties due to their expanse, complex nature, uniqueness, and dynamic states. Risks in construction projects are, indeed, the events or uncertain situations that can have negative or positive consequences on the project objectives. Many of the risks inherent in construction projects affect each other. For example, the time risk in construction projects can affect the cost risk and vice versa. The intertwined relations between risk factors are ignored in the traditional construction risk assessment methods. To fulfill this gap, this paper proposes an integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-fuzzy ANP model to evaluate construction projects and their overall risks by considering intertwined relations among risk factors. Fuzzy DEMATEL is used to determine the interrelationships and interdependencies among risk factors. The network structure for implementing the fuzzy ANP method is extracted based on the results of fuzzy DEMATEL. The fuzzy ANP is applied to assess the relative importance of risk factors and alternatives and prioritize construction projects. The proposed integrated model is used to evaluate five construction projects based on risk factors in Isfahan, Iran. The results of applying the integrated model reveal that the time, cost and safety risks with the weight values of 0.056, 0.038, and 0.034 are the most important factors among construction risks, respectively. The results reveal that the proposed model can help managers to evaluate the overall risks of construction projects, and select the best project that has the lowest risk.

Keyword : construction projects, risk assessment, interrelations among risk factors, fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy analytic network process (ANP)

How to Cite
Hatefi, S., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2019). An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-fuzzy ANP model for evaluating construction projects by considering interrelationships among risk factors. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(2), 114-131.
Published in Issue
Feb 13, 2019
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011.

Chatterjee, K., Zavadskas, E. K., Tamošaitienė, J., Adhikary, K., & Kar, S. (2018). A Hybrid MCDM technique for risk Management in construction projects. Symmetry, 10(2), 46.

Chau Ngoc, D., Long, L. H., Soo-Yong, K., Chau Van, N., Young-Dai, L., & Sun-Ho, L. (2017). Identification of risk patterns in Vietnamese road and bridge construction: Contractor’s perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7(1), 59-72.

Chien, K. F., Wu, Z. H., & Huang, S. C. (2014). Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: Empirical study. Automation in Construction, 45, 1-15.

Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S. M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., & Vahdani, B. (2012). A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(9), 4197-4217.

El-Sayegh, S. M., & Mansour, M. H. (2015). Risk assessment and allocation in highway construction projects in the UAE. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(6), 15-22.

Flanagan, R., & Norman, G. (1993). Risk management and construction. Victoria: Blackwell, Science Pty Ltd.

Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Center.

Ghasemi, F., Sari, M. H. M., Yousefi, V., Falsafi, R., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2018). Project portfolio risk identification and analysis, considering project risk interactions and using Bayesian networks. Sustainability, 10(5), 1609.

Iqbal, S., Choudhry, R. M., Holschemacher, K., Ali, A., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2015). Risk management in construction projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21(1), 65-78.

Islam, M. S., Nepal, M. P., Skitmore, M., & Attarzadeh, M. (2017). Current research trends and application areas of fuzzy and hybrid methods to the risk assessment of construction projects. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 33, 112-131.

Jeng, D. J. F., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Social influence on the use of clinical decision support systems: Revisiting the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(3), 819-828.

KarimiAzari, A., Mousavi, N., Mousavi, S. F., & Hosseini, S. (2011). Risk assessment model selection in construction industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9105-9111.

Leung, L. C., & Cao, D. (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 124, 102-113.

Liang, H., Ren, J., Gao, Z., Gao, S., Luo, X., Dong, L., & Scipioni, A. (2016). Identification of critical success factors for sustainable development of biofuel industry in China based on grey decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL). Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 500-508.

Lin, C., & Wu, W. (2008). A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 205-213.

Liou, J. J. H., Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E. K., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2016). New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 114-134.

Nieto-Morote, A., & Ruz-Vila, F. (2011). A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 220-231.

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. (2003). Defuzzification within a multicriteria decision model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11, 635-652.

Özdemir, A., & Tüysüz, F. (2017). An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP based balanced scorecard approach: application in Turkish higher education institutions. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing, 28(2/3), 251-287.

Ren, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2014). Quantifying, measuring, and strategizing energy security: Determining the most meaningful dimensions and metrics. Energy, 76, 838-849.

Saaty, T. L. (1996). The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and applications of the analytic network process decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Samantra, C., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2017). Fuzzy based risk assessment module for metropolitan construction project: An empirical study. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 65, 449-464.

Seker, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2017). Application of fuzzy DEMATEL method for analyzing occupational risks on construction sites. Sustainability, 9, 2083.

Tah, J. H. M., & Carr, V. (2000). A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic. Construction Management and Economics, 18(4), 491-500.

Tamošaitienė, J., Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2008). Modeling of contractor selection taking into account different risk level. In The 25th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2008) (pp. 676-681).

Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2013). Multi-criteria risk assessment of a construction project. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 129-133.

Taylan, O., Bafail, A. O., Abdulaal, R. M. S., & Kabli, M. R. (2014). Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Applied Soft Computing, 17, 105-116.

Tsai, S. B., Chien, M. F., Xue, Y., Li, L., Jiang, X., Chen, Q., & Wang, L. (2015). Using the fuzzy DEMATEL to determine environmental performance: A case of printed circuit board industry in Taiwan. PLOS ONE, 10(6), 0129153.

Tseng, M. L. (2011). Using a hybrid MCDM model to evaluate firm environmental knowledge management in uncertainty. Applied Soft Computing, 11(1), 1340-1352.

Tzeng, G., Chiang, C., & Li, C. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.

Uygun, Ö., & Dede, A. (2016). Performance evaluation of green supply chain management using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 502-511.

Valipour, A., Yahaya, N., Noor, N. Md., Antuchevičienė, J., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2017). Hybrid SWARA-COPRAS method for risk assessment in deep foundation excavation project: an Iranian case study. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(4), 524-532.

Wang, T., Wang, S., Zhang, L., Huang, Z., & Li, Y. (2016). A major infrastructure risk-assessment framework: Application to a cross-sea route project in China. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1403-1415.

Wei, W. W., & Yu, T. L. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499-507.

Winch, G. (2002). Managing construction projects: An information processing approach. Wiley.

Yazdani-Chamzini, A. (2014). Proposing a new methodology based on fuzzy logic for tunneling risk assessment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 82-94.

Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2010). Risk assessment of construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(1), 33-46.

Zhou, J. L., Bai, Z. H., & Sun, Z. Y. (2014). A hybrid approach for safety assessment in high-risk hydropower-construction-project work systems. Safety Science, 64, 163-172.