Ranking of sustainability criteria for industrial symbiosis applications based on ANP

    Hacı Mehmet Alakaş   Affiliation
    ; Şeyda Gür   Affiliation
    ; Evrencan Özcan   Affiliation
    ; Tamer Eren   Affiliation


Enterprises have started to establish partnerships both to use their internal resources efficiently and to increase their environmental performance. Partnerships and interoperability of enterprises with different processes enable them to benefit more from their benefits. Moving towards the local and regional economy, these partnerships that increase environmental and own resources have created industrial symbiosis practices. Industrial ecology fields are established in these applications. Both environmental and economic gains can be achieved through the efficient use of resources by enterprises and the minimization of wastes. For the sustainability of these partnerships to be established by enterprises, they need to analyze the measures they take internally. In this study, the concept of industrial symbiosis and the criteria that are effective for the sustainability of these industrial symbiosis are evaluated. Analytical network process method is used.  Thus, the industrial symbiosis infrastructures to be established by enterprises have been enabled to move strategically.

Keyword : industrial symbiosis, ANP, industrial partnership, ecology

How to Cite
Alakaş, H. M., Gür, Şeyda, Özcan, E., & Eren, T. (2020). Ranking of sustainability criteria for industrial symbiosis applications based on ANP. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 28(4), 192-201.
Published in Issue
Dec 7, 2020
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. Sage.

Aissani, L., Lacassagne, A., Bahers, J. B., & Féon, S. L. (2019). Life cycle assessment of industrial symbiosis: A critical review of relevant reference scenarios. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23, 972–985.

Alkaş, O., Gür, Ş., & Eren, T. (2020). Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerde E-Tedarik Zincirinin Benimsenmesinde Etkili Olan Faktörlerin Değerlendirilmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 8, 511–521.

Akça, N., Sönmez, S., Gür, Ş., Yılmaz, A., & Eren, T. (2018). Financial manager selection with analytic network process method in public hospitals. Optimum Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 5(2), 133–146.

Bağ, N., Özdemir, M., & Eren, T. (2012). 0–1 nurse scheduling solution with goal programming and ANP method. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 4(1), 2–6.

Bansal, P., & McKnight, B. (2009). Looking forward, pushing back and peering sideways: analyzing the sustainability of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 26–37.

Boix, M., Montastruc, L., Azzaro-Pantel, C., & Domenech, S. (2015). Optimization methods applied to the design of ecoindustrial parks: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 303–317.

Boons, F., Spekkink, W., & Mouzakitis, Y. (2011). The dynamics of industrial symbiosis: a proposal for a conceptual framework based upon a comprehensive literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9–10), 905–911.

Cao, X., Wen, Z., Xu, J., De Clercq, D., Wang, Y., & Tao, Y. (2020). Many-objective optimization of technology implementation in the industrial symbiosis system based on a modified NSGA-III. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118810.

Cecchin, A., Salomone, R., Deutz, P., Raggi, A., & Cutaia, L. (2020). Relating industrial symbiosis and circular economy to the sustainable development debate. In R. Salomone, A. Cecchin, P. Deutz, A. Raggi, & L. Cutaia (Eds.), Industrial symbiosis for the circular economy (pp. 1–25). Springer, Cham.

Chertow, M. R. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(1), 313–337.

Chertow, M. R. (2007). “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(1), 11–30.

Chertow, M., & Ehrenfeld, J. (2012). Organizing self‐organizing systems: Toward a theory of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(1), 13–27.

Costa, I., Massard, G., & Agarwal, A. (2010). Waste management policies for industrial symbiosis development: case studies in European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(8), 815–822.

Fichtner, W., Tietze-Stöckinger, I., Frank, M., & Rentz, O. (2005). Barriers of inter organisational environmental management: two case studies on industrial symbiosis. Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal, 2(1), 73–88.

Geng, Y., Liu, Z., Xue, B., Dong, H., Fujita, T., & Chiu, A. (2014). Emergy-based assessment on industrial symbiosis: a case of Shenyang Economic and Technological Development Zone. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(23), 13572–13587.

Gür, Ş., Uslu, B., Eren, T., Akça, N., Yılmaz, A., & Sönmez, S. (2018). Evaluation of operating room performance in hospitals by using analytic network process. Gazi Journal of Health Sciences, 3(3), 10–25.

Gür, Ş., Bedir, N., & Eren, T. (2017). Selection of marketing strategies with analytical network process and PROMETHEE method for medium sized business in food sector. Nevsehir Journal of Science and Technology, 6(1), 79–92.

Gür Ş., & Eren, T. (2016). Evaluation of factors affecting the performance of businesses by analytical network process method. Trakya University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 5(2), 80–97.

Gümüş, T. Ç. (2016). Development of a cleaner production and industrial symbiosis system for eco-industrial parks [Master thesis]. TOBB University of Economics and Technology Institute of Science.

Hamurcu, M., & Eren, T. (2016, October 13–15). Selection of monorail technology for urban transportation in Ankara with analytical network process. In International Symposium on Railway Systems Engineering (pp. 559–566). Karabük.

Hamurcu, M., & Eren, T. (2020). Electric bus selection with multicriteria decision analysis for green transportation. Sustainability, 12(7), 2777.

Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2007). Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega, 35(3), 274–289.

Jiao, W., & Boons, F. (2014). Toward a research agenda for policy intervention and facilitation to enhance industrial symbiosis based on a comprehensive literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 67, 14–25.

Kerdlap, P., Low, J. S. C., Steidle, R., Tan, D. Z. L., Herrmann, C., & Ramakrishna, S. (2019). Collaboration platform for enabling industrial symbiosis: Application of the industrial-symbiosis life cycle analysis engine. Procedia CIRP, 80, 655–660.

Kurup, B., & Stehlik, D. (2009). Towards a model to assess the sustainability implications of industrial symbiosis in eco-industrial parks. Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal, 6(2), 103–119.

Kumari, S., & Jeble, S. (2020). Waste management through industrial symbiosis: case study approach. Latin American Journal of Management for Sustainable Development, 5(1), 37–46.

Leigh, M., & Li, X. (2015). Industrial ecology, industrial symbiosis and supply chain environmental sustainability: a case study of a large UK distributor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 632–643.

Leong, Y. T., Lee, J. Y., Tan, R. R., Foo, J. J., & Chew, I. M. L. (2017). Multi-objective optimization for resource network synthesis in eco-industrial parks using an integrated analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 1268–1283.

Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, R., Yu, X., & Zhang, L. (2020). Uncovering driving forces of co-benefits achieved by eco-industrial development strategies at the scale of industrial park. Energy & Environment, 31(2), 275–290.

Montastruc, L., Boix, M., Pibouleau, L., Azzaro-Pantel, C., & Domenech, S. (2013). On the flexibility of an ecoindustrial park (EIP) for managing industrial water. Journal of Cleaner Production, 43, 1–11.

Muhcu, Ü. (2016). Determining the importance level of critical success factors affecting humanitarian supply chain: Analytic network process application [Master thesis]. Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Nelson, J. A., & Power, M. (2018). Ecology, sustainability, and care: Developments in the field. Feminist Economics, 24(3), 80–88.

Ocampo L. A., Vergara, V. G. N., Impas, C. G., Tordillo, J. A. S., & Pastoril, J. S. (2015). Identifying critical indicators in sustainable manufacturing using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, 14(3–4), 1–8.

Özcan, E. C., Özcan, N. A., & Eren, T. (2017). Selection of the solar power plants with CSP technologies by combined ANPPROMETHEE approach. Başkent University Journal of Faculty of Commercial Sciences, 1(1), 18–44.

Pakarinen, S., Mattila, T., Melanen, M., Nissinen, A., & Sokka, L. (2010). Sustainability and industrial symbiosis – The evolution of a Finnish forest industry complex. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1393–1404.

Raimbault, J., Broere, J., Somveille, M., Serna, J. M., Strombom, E., Moore, C., Zhu, B., & Sugar, L. (2020). A spatial agent-based model for simulating and optimizing networked eco-industrial systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104538.

Saaty, T. L. (1999, August). Fundamentals of the analytic network process. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (pp. 12–14).

Shah, I. H., Behera, S. K., Rene, E. R., & Park, H. S. (2020). Integration of bio refineries for waste valorization in Ulsan EcoIndustrial Park, Korea. In Waste Biorefinery (pp. 659–678). Elsevier.

Sevinç, A., Gür, Ş., & Eren, T. (2018). Analysis of the difficulties of SMEs in industry 4.0 applications by analytical hierarchy process and analytical network process. Processes, 6(12), 264.

Simboli, A., Taddeo, R., Raggi, A., & Morgante, A. (2020). Structure and relationships of existing networks in view of the potential industrial symbiosis development. In R. Salomone, A. Cecchin, P. Deutz, A. Raggi, & L. Cutaia (Eds.), Industrial symbiosis for the circular economy (pp. 57–71). Springer, Cham.

Sokka, L., Melanen, M., & Nissinen, A. (2008). How can the sustainability of industrial symbioses be measured?. Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal, 5(5–6), 518–535.

Song, X., Geng, Y., Dong, H., & Chen, W. (2018). Social network analysis on industrial symbiosis: A case of Gujiaoecoindustrial park. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 414–423.

Teodorescu, C., & Danubianu, M. (2015). Industrial symbiosis, ecoefficiency, sustainability a case study. Present Environment and Sustainable Development, 9(1), 169–179.

Tinmaz, M. (2017). Selection among technology retail company using fuzzy analytic network process methodology [Master thesis]. Sakarya University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences.

Uslu, B., Gür, Ş., & Eren, T. (2019). Evaluation of best strategy selection for industry 4.0 application by ANP and TOPSIS methods. Eskisehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology B-Theoretical Sciences, 7(1), 13–38.

Yazan, D. M., & Fraccascia, L. (2020). Sustainable operations of industrial symbiosis: an enterprise input-output model integrated by agent-based simulation. International Journal of Production Research, 58(2), 392–414.

Yu, C., Davis, C., & Dijkema, G. P. (2014). Understanding the evolution of industrial symbiosis research: A bibliometric and network analysis (1997–2012). Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18(2), 280–293.

Zhao, H., Zhao, H., & Guo, S. (2017). Evaluating the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks by employing multi-criteria decision-making approach for circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2262–2276.

Wang, Z., Jiang, Y., Huang, Y., & Jia, X. (2017). Complex network method towards evaluating industrial symbiosis. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 61, 169–174.

World Energy Council. (2018). World Energy Trilemma Index 2018.

Wu, J., Pu, G., Ma, Q., Qi, H., & Wang, R. (2017). Quantitative environmental risk assessment for the iron and steel industrial symbiosis network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 157, 106–117.