Criteria selection for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings


Cultural heritage buildings are an important origin of a country‘s cultural memory, originality, and attractiveness, which motivated cultural growth, economic development, and social employment. However, cultural heritage buildings threaten to decay regarding the contributing poor funding for cultural heritage buildings preservation and maintenance, increasing urbanization changes. The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings is one of the reasons, helping to preserve heritage buildings. This paper submits qualitative and quantitative criteria and subcriteria for the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings. The set of criteria consists of economic, social, environmental, cultural heritage and legal criterion.

Article in Lithuanian.

Kriterijų parinkimas kultūros paveldo pastatų pakartotiniam naudojimui


Kultūros paveldo pastatai – svarbus šalies kultūrinės atminties, savitumo ir patrauklumo šaltinis, skatinantis šalies kultūrinį augimą, ekonominį vystymąsi ir socialinį užimtumą. Tačiau, skiriant nepakankamą finansavimą paveldo pastatų priežiūrai ir išsaugojimui, didėjant urbanizacijos pokyčiams gresia šių pastatų sunykimas. Todėl paveldo pastatų pakartotinis naudojimas – viena iš išeičių, padėsiančių išsaugoti paveldo pastatus. Straipsnyje siūlomas paveldo pastatų pakartotinio naudojimo kriterijų rinkinys. Pasiūlyti kriterijai suskirstyti į kiekybinius ir kokybinius kriterijus bei subkriterijus. Kriterijų rinkinį sudaro ekonominiai, socialiniai, aplinkos, kultūros paveldo ir teisiniai kriterijai. Kriterijai skirti paveldo pastatų pakartotinio naudojimo alternatyvoms vertinti.

Reikšminiai žodžiai: paveldo pastatai, kultūros pastatai, pakartotinis naudojimas, kriterijai, vertinimas.

Keyword : heritage buildings, cultural buildings, adaptive reuse, criteria, evaluation

How to Cite
Morkūnaitė, Žydrūnė. (2020). Criteria selection for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 11.
Published in Issue
Jan 9, 2020
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Ai-Lin Teo, E., & Lin, G. (2010). Developing a model for computing the building adaptation potential index for public housing in Singapore. Architectural Science Review, 53, 429–440.

Ai-Lin Teo, E., & Lin, G. (2012). Factors affecting adaptation potential for public housing in Singapore: Decision makers’ perspective. International Journal of Constructin Management, 12(3), 63–84.

Aigwi, I. E., Egbelakin, T., & Ingham, J. (2018). Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilized historical buildings: Towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centers. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(4), 385–407.

Blagojevič, M. R., & Tufegdzin, A. (2016). The new technology era requirements and sustainable approach to industrial heritage renewal. Energy and Buildings, 115, 148–153.

Castaldo, V. L., Pisello, A. L. Boarin, P., Petrozzi, A., & Cotana, F. (2017). The experience of international sustainability protocols for retrofitting historical buildings in Italy. Buildings 7(2), 52.

Cellura, M., Ciulla, G., Guarino, F., & Longo, S. (2017). Redesign of a rural building in a heritage site in Italy: Towards the Net Zero energy target. Buildings, 7(3), 68.

Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4-5), 331–350.

Choi, E. (2010). Ustification of public subsidy: Externality effects of a historic church reuse project on neighborhood housing sale prices in Cleveland, Ohio. International Review of Public Administration, 15(1), 51–67.

Conejos, S., Langston, C., Chan, E., & Chew, M. (2016). Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Building Reasearch and Information, 44(5), 507–509.

Conejos S., Chew M. Y. L., Yung E. H. K. (2017). The future adaptivity of nineteenth century heritage buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 35(4), 332–347.

Dyson, K., Matthews, J., & Love, P. E. D. (2016). Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: an exploratory study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 6(1), 44–57.

Eshrati, P., Bahramjerdi, S. F. N., Mahabadi, S. E., & Azad, M. (2017). Evaluation of authenticity on the basis of the Nara Grid in Adaptive Reuse of Manochehri historical house Kashan, Iran. Archnet- Ijar International Journal of Architectural Research, 11(3), 214.

Ferretti, V., Bottero, M., & Mondini, G. (2014). Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15, 644–655.

Fuentes, J. M. (2010). Methodological bases for documenting and reusing vernacular farm architecture. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11, 119–129.

Giove, S., Rosato, P., & Breil, M. (2011). An application of multicriteria decision making to build heritage. The redevelopment of Venice Arsenale. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 17, 85–99.

Giuliani, F., De Falco, A., Landi, S., Bevilacqua, M. G., Santini, L., & Pecori, S. (2018). Reusing grain silos from the 1930s in Italy. A multi-criteris decision analysis for the case of Arezzo. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 29, 145–159.

Hsu, Y., & Juan, Y. (2016). ANN – based decision model for the reuse of vacant buildings in urban areas. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(1), 31-43.

Irons, J., & Armitage, L. (2011). The value of built heritage: community, economy, and environment. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 14(4), 614–633.

Langston, C., & Shen, L. (2007). Application of the adaptive reuse potential model in Hong Kong: a case study of Lui Seng Chun. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11, 193–207.

Lynch, N. (2014). Divine living: marketing and selling churches as lofts in Toronto, Canada. Housing, Theory and Society, 31(2), 192–212.

Lynch, N. (2016). Domesticating the church: the reuse of urban churches as loft living in the post – secular city. Social and Cultural Geography, 17(7), 849–870.

Martins, A. M. T., & Carlos, J. S. (2014). The retrofitting of the Bernardas’ Convent in Lisbon. Energy and Buildings, 68, 396–402.

Mehr, S. Y., & Wilkinson, S. (2018). Technical issues and energy efficient adaptive reuse of heritage listed city halls in Queensland Australia. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(5), 529–542.

Milisirlisoy, D., & Gunçe, K. (2016). A critical look to the adaptive reuse of traditional urban houses in the Walled city of Nicosia. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 22(2), 149–166.

Oevermann, H., Degenkolb, J., Diessler, A., Karge, S., & Peltz, U. (2015). Participation in the reuse of industrial heritage sites: the case of Oberschoneweide, Berlin. International Journal of Heritage, 22(1), 43–58.

Paolillo, P. L., Benedetti, A., Baresi, U., Terlizzi, L., & Graj, G. (2011). An assessment – based process for modifying the built fabric of historic centres: the case of Como in Lombrady. CCSA 2011: Computational Science and Its Applications – IC-CSA 2011, 162–176.

Plevoets, B., & Sowinska-Heim, J. (2018). Community initiatives as a catalyst for regeneration of heritage sites: Vernacular transformation and its influence on the formal adaptive re-use practice. Cities, 78, 128–139.

Pszczolkowski, M. (2016). Adaptation problems of the postindustrial heritage on the example of selected objects of Bydgoszcz. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports, 22(3), 145–155.

Radziszewska- Zielina, E., & Sladowski, G. (2015). Fuzzy inference system assisting the choice of a variant of adaptation of a historical building. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 14(4), 131–148.

Radziszewska- Zielina, E., & Sladowski, G. (2017). Supporting the selection of a variant of the adaptation of a historical building with the use of fuzzy modelling and structural analysis. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 26, 53–63.

Remoy, H., & van der Voordt, T. (2014). Adaptive reuse of office buildings into housing: opportunities and risks. Building Research and Information, 42(3), 381–390.

Sallem Beg, M. (2016). Issues of conservation and adaptation in protecting Kashmir’s vernacular heritage. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 73(4), 524–532.

Tan, Y., Shen, L., & Langston, C. (2014). A fuzzy approach for adaptive reuse selection of industrial buildings in Hong Kong. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(1), 66–76.

Tokede, O., Udawatta, N., & Luther, M. (2018). Retrofitting heritage office buildings in the UK: a case study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(1), 39–50.

Ustinovičius, L. ir Jakučionis, S. (2000). Application of multicreteria decision methods in restoration of building in the old town. Statyba – Civil Engineering, 6(4), 227–236.

Wang, H., & Zeng, Z. (2010). A multi-objective decision – making process for reuse selection of historic buildings. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1241–1249.

Wilkinson, S. (2014). The preliminary assessment of adaptation potential in existing office buildings. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(1), 77–87.

Wilkinson, S., James, K., & Reed, R. (2009). Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia. Structural Survey, 27(1), 46–61.

Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2007). Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building’s regeneration alternatives. Building and Environment, 42, 436–451.

Zilinskas, R. (2016). Tyrimų teisinis reguliavimas. Kultūros paveldo tyrimai. Metodinis leidinys, 14–19.