Share:


Investigation of industrial intellectual property protection methods and their improvement

Abstract

This article main purpose is to analyse the existing industrial intellectual property protection methods and to provide some suggestions for improvements. It gives insights on all possible protection methods, when it is best to use it and how to choose. This article shows a different approach taken to solve a complex and lengthy process. In this paper, Business Process Modelling techniques have been introduced and applied providing a different point of view to solve some of the issues. The main idea is to remove non-value adding processes and introduce ICT based software between different parties involved.


Article in English.


Pramoninės intelektinės nuosavybės apsaugos metodų tyrimas ir jų tobulinimas


Santrauka


Pagrindinis šio straipsnio tikslas – išanalizuoti esamus pramoninės intelektinės nuosavybės apsaugos metodus ir pateikti galimus pasiūlymus juos tobulinti. Analizuojamos įžvalgos apie daugumą galimų intelektinės nuosavybės apsaugos metodų, nagrinėjama, kada geriausia juos taikyti ir kaip pasirinkti. Straipsnyje pateikiamas ir kitoks požiūris į problemų sprendimą šio sudėtingo ir ilgo proceso metu, pasirinktos ir pritaikytos verslo proceso modeliavimo technikos, padedančios pažvelgti į problemas kitu kampu. Pagrindinė šių technikų idėja – pašalinti vertės nepridedančius procesus ir pradėti naudoti informacijos ir komunikacijos technologijomis grįstas programas.


Reikšminiai žodžiai: intelektinė nuosavybė, pramonė, apsauga, tyrimai, tobulinimas, patentai, naudingasis modelis, pritaikymas.

Keyword : intellectual property, industries, protection, investigation, improvement, patent, utility models, application

How to Cite
Paškonytė, D. (2019). Investigation of industrial intellectual property protection methods and their improvement. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 11. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2019.1497
Published in Issue
Feb 1, 2019
Abstract Views
3229
PDF Downloads
574
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Baldwin, C. Y., & Henkel, J. (2015). Modularity and intellectual property protection. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1637-1655. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2303

Beard, R. (2013). 7 ways to increase survey response rates. Retrieved from https://blog.clientheartbeat.com/7-ways-to-increase-survey-response-rates

Colson, T. (2007). Protecting your intellectual property with patent alternatives. Retrieved from https://www.industryweek.com/regulations/protecting-your-intellectual-property-patent-alternatives

Duncan, D. Nulty. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231

Greenhalgh, H. (2010). Theft of intellectual property ‘should be a crime’. In Financial times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/d95fc81c-c7f7-11df-ae3a-00144feab49a

Hudson, J., & Minea, A. (2013). Innovation, intellectual property rights and economic development: a unified empirical investigation. World Development, 46, 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.023

John Reh, F. (2016). Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) protect your intellectual property. Retrieved from https://www.thebalance.com/ndas-protect-intellectual-property-2275250

Leiponen, A., & Byma, J. (2009). If you cannot block, you better run: small firms, cooperative innovation and appropriation strategies. Research Policy, 38, 1478-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.003

Papageorgiadis, N., & Sharma, A. (2016). Intellectual property rights and innovation: a panel analysis. Economics Letters, 141, 70-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.01.003

Quinn, G. (2011). If you are against software patents, you are against innovation. Retrieved from https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100107/0515207655.shtml

Shapiro, C. (2001). Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard-setting. In Innovation policy and the economy (pp. 119-150). Cambridge: The MIT Press I. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.273550

Sweet, C. M., & Maggio, D. S. E. (2014). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation? World Development, 66, 665-677.

Trott, P. (2012). Managing intellectual property. In Innovation management and new product development (5th ed., pp. 154-191). Harlow, England: Pearson.

Wagner, S. (2015). Are ‘patent thickets’ smothering innovation? In Yale insights. Retrieved from http://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/are-patent-thickets-smothering-innovation