Share:


Modelling EU bioeconomy credentials in the economic development framework: the role of intellectual capital

    Mirela Cristea   Affiliation
    ; Graţiela Georgiana Noja   Affiliation
    ; Nicu Marcu Affiliation
    ; Marian Siminică   Affiliation
    ; Diana-Mihaela Ţîrcă Affiliation

Abstract

Given the global importance of bioeconomy for sustainable development and its trendiness in the knowledge driven literature, our research aims to develop a general assessment framework for several shaping factors of bioeconomy fundamentals within the European Union under the decisive impact of the intellectual capital credentials, namely educational attainment, research and development activities and innovation patterns. Considering that there is a high heterogeneity among Member States (MS), selectively regarding the implementation of the intellectual capital in the knowledge economy, but also a differential degree of bioeconomy advances, we have compiled distinct panels on the two groups of EU-28 MS, namely EU-15 (old MS) and EU-13 (new MS). The purpose is to examine the inferences of the intellectual capital in the context of economic development and to shape its role in achieving a sustainable bioeconomy. We have applied several macro-econometric procedures for each considered group, namely: multifactorial macro-econometric models, structural equation modelling (SEM) and Gaussian Graphical Models (GGM), for the period 1995-2016. The results highlight that education, innovation and research, along with main bioeconomy credentials, are at the core of economic development of both EU-13 and EU-15 countries, having distinctive dissimilarities between them, particularly enhanced for the new EU-13 MS.


First published online 25 August 2020

Keyword : bioeconomy, education, innovation, economic development, European Union, econometric procedures

How to Cite
Cristea, M., Noja, G. G., Marcu, N., Siminică, M., & Ţîrcă, D.-M. (2020). Modelling EU bioeconomy credentials in the economic development framework: the role of intellectual capital. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(6), 1139-1164. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.13159
Published in Issue
Nov 17, 2020
Abstract Views
232
PDF Downloads
128
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Adamowicz, M. (2017). Bio-economy as a concept of development strategies in the European Union. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 2(4), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.24.3001

Alsaleh, M., Abdul-Rahim, A. S., & Mohd-Shahwahid, H. O. (2017). Determinants of technical efficiency in the bioenergy industry in the EU28 region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 1331–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.049

Anghel, I., Siminică, M., Cristea, M., Noja, G. G., & Sichigea, M. (2019). Bioeconomy credentials and intellectual capital: a comparative modelling approach for the E.U.-13 and E.U.-15. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 2699–2722. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1653212

Antoneac, R., & Dobrota, C. E. (2017). Funding studies abroad and in Romania. In Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, Madrid, Spain (pp. 441–451). https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/894427.Book_of_Proceedings_esdMadrid_2017_Online2.pdf#page=451

Barcenilla, S., Gimenez, G., & Lopez-Pueyo, C. (2019). Differences in total factor productivity growth in the European Union: the role of human capital by income level. Prague Economic Papers, 28(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.689

Baum, F. C. (2006). An introduction to modern econometrics using stata. Stata Press.

Bildirici, M., & Ozaksoy, F. (2018). An analysis of biomass consumption and economic growth in transition countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1427610

BIOEAST. (2018). BIOEAST Vision Paper. BIOEAST-Central and Eastern European Initiative for Knowledge-Based Agriculture, Aquaculture and Forestry in the Bioeconomy. https://bioeast.eu/download/bioeast_vision_paper_23022018/

Birner, R. (2018). Bioeconomy concepts. In I. Lewandowski (Ed.), Bioeconomy: Shaping the transition to a sustainable, biobased economy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8

Bracco, S., Calicioglu, O., Gomez San Juan, M., & Flammini, A. (2018). Assessing the contribution of bioeconomy to the total economy: a review of national frameworks. Sustainability, 10(6), 1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061698

Cîrstea, Ş. D., Cîrstea, A., Popa, I. E., & Radu, G. (2019). The role of bioenergy in transition to a sustainable bioeconomy – Study on EU countries. Amfiteatru Economic, 21(50), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2019/50/75

Dediu, I. (2014). Bioeconomia – O creatie stiintifica romaneasca. Ecology, 2(33), 59–61 (in Romanian). https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/Bioeconomia%20o%20creatie%20stiintifica%20romaneasca.pdf

Dinca, M., & Luches, D. (2018). Work Integration of the Roma: Between Family and Labor Market. Sustainability, 10(5), 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051495

Dobra, A., Eicher, T., & Lenkoski, A. (2008). Modeling uncertainty in macroeconomic growth determinants using Gaussian Graphical models (Working Paper 87). Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Washington, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stamet.2009.11.003

Dobrzanski, P. (2018). Innovation expenditures efficiency in Central and Eastern European Countries. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 36(2), 827–859.

Dragoi, M. C., Andrei, J. V., Mieila, M., Panait, M., Dobrota, C. E., & Lădaru, R. G. (2018). Food safety and security in Romania – An econometric analysis in the context of national agricultural paradigm transformation. Amfiteatru Economic, 20(47), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2018/47/134

Dybdahl, L. M., & Iversen, E. J. (2019). What knowledge does the bioeconomy build upon?. In A. Klitkou, A. M. Fevolden, & M. Capasso (Eds.), From waste to value. Valorisation pathways for organic waste streams in circular bioeconomies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429460289

Epskamp, S., Waldorp, L., Mottus, R., & Borsboom, D. (2018). The Gaussian graphical model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(4), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823

European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020, Brussels, Belgium. https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf

European Commission. (2012). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe. Brussels, Belgium. https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/official-strategy_en.pdf

European Commission. (2018). A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment, Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. Brussels, Belgium. https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/ec_bioeconomy_strategy_2018.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none.

Eurostat. (2019). Database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1977). Inequality, limits and growth from a bio-economic viewpoint. Review of Social Economy, 35(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346767700000041

Gomez San Juan, M., Bogdanski, A., & Dubois, O. (2019). Towards sustainable bioeconomy – Lessons learned from case studies. FAO.

Kaza, S., Yao, L. C., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. Urban Development, Washington DC, World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0

Kung, C.-C. (2018). A dynamic framework of sustainable development in agriculture and bioenergy. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 64(10), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.17221/281/2017-AGRICECON

Leal Filho, W., Pociovalisteanu, D. M., & Al-Amin, A. Q. (2017). Sustainable economic development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45081-0

Lewandowski, I., Gaudet, N., Lask, J., Maier, J., Tchouga, B., & Vargas-Carpintero, R. (2018). Context. In I. Lewandowski (Ed.), Bioeconomy: Shaping the transition to a sustainable, biobased economy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8

Marcu, N., Siminica, M., Noja, G. G, Cristea, M., & Dobrota, C. E. (2018). Migrants’ integration on the European labor market: A spatial bootstrap, SEM and network approach. Sustainability, 10(12), 4543. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124543

Luhova, M. (2015). Selected types of investments enabling development of bioeconomy in the region. Economic and Regional Studies, 8(3), 100–110.

McKenzie, D., & Sasin, M. J. (2007). Migration, remittances, poverty, and human capital: Conceptual and empirical challenges (Policy Research Working Paper, 4272). World Bank, Washington, DC. https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-4272

Nedelea, A. M., Mironiuc, M., Huian, M. C., Birsan, M., & Bedrule-Grigoruta, M. V. (2018). Modeled interdependencies between intellectual capital, circular economy and economic growth in the context of bioeconomy. Amfiteatru Economic, 20(49), 616–663. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2018/49/616

Nordic Council of Ministers. (2018). Nordic bioeconomy programme 15 action points for sustainable change. Copenhagen, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.6027/ANP2018-785

OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf

OECD. (2009). The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda. International Futures Programme. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056886-en

OECD. (2018). Meeting policy challenges for a sustainable bioeconomy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292345-en

Popescu, G., Andrei, J. V., Nica, E., Mieila, M., & Panait, M. (2019). Analysis on the impact of investments, energy use and domestic material consumption in changing the Romanian economic paradigm. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.7454

Pyka, A., & Prettner, K. (2018). Economic growth, development, and innovation: The transformation towards a knowledge-based bioeconomy. In I. Lewandowski (Ed.), Bioeconomy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_11

Refsgaard, K., Teras, J., Kull, M., Oddsson, G., Johannesson, T., & Kristensen, I. (2018). The rapidly developing Nordic bioeconomy: Excerpt from state of the Nordic Region. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.6027/e8424b2c-en

Ronzon, T., & M’Barek, R. (2018). Socioeconomic indicators to monitor the EU’s bioeconomy in transition. Sustainability, 10(6), 1745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061745

Ronzon, T., Santini, F., & M’Barek, R. (2015). The bioeconomy in the European Union in numbers. Facts and figures on biomass, turnover and employment. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Spain. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/JRC97789%20Factsheet_Bioeconomy_final.pdf

Sanders, L. (2007). Models in spatial analysis. ISTE Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470612255

Schutte, G. (2018). What kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need?. New Biotechnology, 40, 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003

Stevanovic, T., Ivanovic-Dukic, M., Radenovic, T., & Radovic, O. (2018). The impact of national intellectual capital on the economic growth in the South-Eastern European countries. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 36(2), 777–800.

Tondl, G., & Vuksic, G. (2003). What makes regions in Eastern Europe catching up? The role of foreign investment, human resources and geography (ZEI Working Papers B 12-2003). University of Bonn, ZEI – Center for European Integration Studies, Bonn, Germany. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/39510

Zemlickienė, V., & Turskis, Z. (2020). Evaluation of the expediency of technology commercialization: a case of information technology and biotechnology. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(1), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.11918

Zilberman, D., Gordon, B., Hochman, G., & Wesseler, J. (2018). Economics of sustainable development and the bioeconomy. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx051

Vargas-Hernandez, J. G., Pallagst, K., & Hammer, P. (2018). Bio-economy at the crossroads of sustainable development. In S. Dhiman & J. Marques (Eds.), Handbook of engaged sustainability. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53121-2_52-1

Wooldridge, J. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://economics.ut.ac.ir/documents/3030266/14100645/Jeffrey_M._Wooldridge_Introductory_Econometrics_A_Modern_Approach__2012.pdf