Share:


Development and validation of an Industry 4.0 adaptation potential scale (4IRAPS)

    Fikret Sözbilir   Affiliation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a scale that can measure the potential of adapting to Industry 4.0, which refers to the fourth industrial revolution described as a combination of the innovation of various digital technologies rapidly developed in recent years. In addition, the reliability and validity of the Industry 4.0 Adaptation Potential (4IRAPS) is demonstrated. This research was conducted in two stages of a pilot and a main study. The data was collected from 174 participants enrolled in technical and management departments at the graduate and associate degree levels of two different universities. A 50-item questionnaire concerning Industry 4.0 prepared by experts experienced in this field was applied to the participants. As a result of a factor analysis, 30 items and 11 subscales with low a factor load and reliability level were removed from the questionnaire. The reliability and validity of 4IRAPS were verified by” the analyses via PLS-SEM. Finally, the remaining four sub-dimensions referring to Industry 4.0 were labelled as interested, effort for adaptation, readiness, and pessimism. This study developed the first scale of the industry 4.0 adaptation potential. The scale consists of four sub-dimensions and 17 items. It was determined that this scale was statistically reliable and valid.


First published online 23 March 2021

Keyword : industry 4.0, adaptation potential, scale development, effort, pessimism about industry 4.0

How to Cite
Sözbilir, F. (2021). Development and validation of an Industry 4.0 adaptation potential scale (4IRAPS). Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(3), 704-721. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14513
Published in Issue
May 25, 2021
Abstract Views
241
PDF Downloads
97
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Bauer, C., & Wee, D. (2015, June 01). Manufacturing’s next act. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/manufacturings-next-act

Bauer, W., Schlund, S., Hornung, T., & Schuler, S. (2018). Digitalization of industrial value chains – A review and evaluation of existing use cases of Industry 4.0 in Germany. Scientific Journal of Logistics, 14(3), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2018.288

Charlton, E. (2019, January 14). These are the 10 most in-demand skills of 2019, according to LinkedIn. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/the-hard-and-soft-skills-tofutureproof-your-career-according-to-linkedin/

Chin, W. (1998). Issues and opinions on structural equation modelling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16. www.jstor.org/stable/249674

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Demirci, K., Orhan, H., Demirdas, A., Akpinar, A., & Sert, H. (2014). Validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the smartphone addiction scale in a younger population. Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 24(3), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20140710040824

Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tinyyeteffective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192

Eberhard, B., Podio, M., Alonso, A. P., Radovica, E., Avotina, L., Peiseniece, L., Sendon, M. C., Gonzales Lozano, A., & Solé-Pla, J. (2017). Smart work: The transformation of the labour market due to the fourth industrial revolution (I4.0). International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), 10(3), 47–66.

Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Forsell, T., Tower, J., & Polman, R. (2020). Development of a scale to measure social capital in recreation and Sport Clubs. Leisure Sciences, 42(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1442268

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014a). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Pearson Education Limited.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014b). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publication.

Hamada, T. (2019). Determinants of decision-makers’ attitudes toward Industry 4.0 adaptation. Social Sciences, 8(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050140

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New Challenges to international marketing: Vol. 20. Advances in international marketing (pp. 277–320). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014

Hertzog, M. A. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247

Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation: A collection of principles, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences (3 ed.). EdITS Publishers.

Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692

Koca, D. (2020). Sanayi devrimlerinin tarihsel arka planı ve işgücü becerileri üzerindeki yansımaları. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 16(31), 4531–4558. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.704841

Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611420

Magson, N. R., Craven, R. G., & Bodkin-Andrews, G. H. (2014). Measuring social capital: The development of the social capital and cohesion scale and the associations between social capital and mental health. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 14, 202–216.

Pereira, A., & Romero, F. A. (2017). Review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1206–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.032

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com

Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: Measures of social psychological attitudes (pp. 1–16). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50005-8

Ruppert, T., Jaskó, S., Holczinger, T., & Abonyi, J. (2018). Enabling technologies for Operator 4.0: A survey. Applied Sciences, 8(9), 1650. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091650

Sanders, A., Elangeswaran, C., & Wulfsberg, J. (2016). Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in Industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(3), 811–833. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1940

Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting, R. C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., & Jozinovic’, P. (2015). Industry 4.0 – potentials for creating smart products: Empirical research results. In W. Abramowicz (Ed.), Lecture notes in business information processing: Vol. 208. Business information systems (pp. 16–27). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_2

Slavec, A., & Drnovsek, M. (2012). A perspective on scale development in entrepreneurship research. Economic and Business Review for Central and South-Eastern Europe, 14(1), 39–62.

Solís, M., & Mora-Esquivel, R. (2019). Development and validation of a measurement scale of the innovative culture in work teams. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-07-2018-0073

Stein, C. M., Morris, N. J., & Nock, N. L. (2012). Structural equation modelling. In R. Elston, J. Satagopan, & S. Sun (Eds.), Statistical human genetics: Methods and protocols. Methods in molecular biology (pp. 495–512). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-555-8_27

Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0-A glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 20(1), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034

World Economic Forum. (2016). The Future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution (Global Challenge Insight Report). http://www3.weforum.org/docs/ WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf

Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806

Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: Application of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 46(Special Issue), 74–85. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuisletme/issue/32177/357061

Zhong, R., Xu, X., Klotz, E., & Newman, S. (2017). Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: A review. Engineering, 3(5), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015