Share:


Multi-criteria approach in evaluating contribution of social entrepreneurship to the employment of socially-excluded groups

    Marija Džunić Affiliation
    ; Jelena Stanković Affiliation
    ; Vesna Janković-Milić Affiliation

Abstract

The paper explores the potential impact of social enterprises on social exclusion. In particular, the role of social enterprises in labour market integration of socially excluded individuals is analysed within the existing theoretical and policy discourses of exclusion. Taking into account the difficulties in measuring the social impact of social enterprises, our study contributes to the quantitative literature on the performance of social enterprises, taking the number of integrated people as a measure of the impact on social exclusion. The research is based on data on the employment of marginalized groups, derived from a unique dataset collected by a recently conducted survey of social enterprises in Serbia. The original methodological framework combines statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making model, in order to evaluate the contribution of different types of enterprises to the employment of excluded individuals. Weights determination for the MCDM model is performed using entropy while TOPSIS method is applied for the ranking of the types of social enterprises according to the employment of socially excluded categories. The results indicate that enterprises for employment of persons with disabilities, citizens’ associations and cooperatives in Serbia contribute the most in integrating the socially excluded.

Keyword : social exclusion, social enterprises, work integration, multi-criteria decision making, entropy, TOPSIS

How to Cite
Džunić, M., Stanković, J., & Janković-Milić, V. (2018). Multi-criteria approach in evaluating contribution of social entrepreneurship to the employment of socially-excluded groups. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(5), 1885-1908. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2017.1347906
Published in Issue
Oct 1, 2018
Abstract Views
25
PDF Downloads
13
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Aiken, M. 2006. Toward markets or state: tensions and opportunities in the evolutionary path of three UK social enterprises, in M. Nyssens (Ed.). Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society. London and New York: Routledge, 259–271.

Aiken, M. 2007. What is the role of social enterprise in finding, creating and maintaining employment for disadvantaged groups? London: Office of the Third Sector.

Alvord, S. H.; Brown, L. D.; Letts, C. W. 2004. Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: an exploratory study, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 40(3): 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886304266847

Amin, A. 2009. Extraordinarily ordinary: working in the social economy, Social Enterprise Journal 5(1): 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610910956390

Austin, J.; Gutierrez, R.; Ogliastri, E.; Reficco, E. 2006. Effective management of social enterprises: lessons from business and civil society organisations in Iberoamerica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bacq, S.; Janssen, F. 2011. The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: a review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23(5/6): 373–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.577242

Blackburn, R.; Ram, M. 2006. Fix or fixation? The contributions and limitations of entrepreneurship and small firms to combating social exclusion, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 18(1): 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620500419566

Borzaga, C.; Loss, M. 2006. Multiple goals and multi-stakeholder management in Italian social enterprises, in M. Nyssens (Ed.). Social enterprise: at the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society. London and New York: Routledge, 169–194.

Burchardt, T.; Le Grand, J.; Piachaud, D. 2002. Degrees of exclusion: developing a dynamic, multidimensional measure, in J. Hills, J. Le Grand, D. Piachaud (Eds.). Understanding social exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Byrne, D. 2005. Social exclusion. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.W.; Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 12(6): 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

Chen, Y.; Qu, L. 2006. Evaluating the selection of logistics centre location using Fuzzy MCA Model based on entropy weight, in The IEEE Proceedings of 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation 2: 7128–7132.

Choi, N.; Majumdar, S. 2014. Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: opening a new avenue for systematic future research, Journal of Business Venturing 29(3): 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.001

Chu, A. T. W.; Kalaba, R. E.; Spingarn, K. 1979. A Comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to Fuzzy Sets, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 27(4): 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00933438

Cochrane, A. 2003. The new urban policy: towards empowerment or incorporation? The practice of urban policy, in R. Imrie, M. Waco (Eds.). Urban renaissance? New labour, community and urban policy. Bristol: The Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t898kc.17

Cvejić, S. 2013. Public Policies as a Framework for Development of Social Entrepreneurship in Serbia, in S. Cvejić (Ed.). Cooperatives and social enterprises in Europe and in transitional contexts. Belgrade: The Institute for Sociological Research, 48–61.

Dacin, P.; Dacin, M.; Matear, M. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here, Academy of Management Perspectives 24(3): 37–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950

Davister, C.; Defourny, J.; Gre´goire, O. 2004. Work integration social enterprises in the European Union: an overview of existing models. EMES working papers 04/04. Lie`ge: EMES European Research Network.

Dees, J. G. 1998. The meaning of social entrepreneurship [online], [cited 25 September 2016]. Available from Internet: http://www.redalmarza.cl/ing/pdf/TheMeaningofsocialEntrepreneurship.pdf

Dees, J.; Anderson, B. 2006. Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: building on two schools of practice and thought, in Research on social entrepreneurship, ARNOVA occasional paper series 1(3): 39–66.

Defourny, J.; Nyssens, M. 2006. Defining social enterprise, in M. Nyssens (Ed.). Social enterprise: at the crossroads of markets, public policies and civil society. London, New York: Routledge, 3–26.

Defourny, J.; Nyssens, M. 2008. Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments, Social Enterprise Journal 4(3): 202–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610810922703

Defourny, J.; Nyssens, M. 2010. Social enterprise in Europe: at the crossroads of market, public policies and third sector, Policy and Society 29(3): 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.07.002

Defourny, J.; Nyssens, M. 2012. The EMES approach of Social enterprise in a comparative perspective, in EMES Working papers 12/03.

Department of Trade and Industry. 2002. Social enterprise: a strategy for success. DTI: London.

Doherty, B.; Haugh, H.; Fergus L. 2014. Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: a review and research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews 16: 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028

Dussart, C.; Grosjean, P.; Hamende, V.; Toussaint, V. 2003. L’Economie Sociale d’Insertion. Rapport Final, Ciriec.

Evers, A. 2001. The significance of social capital in the multiple goal and resource structure of social enterprises, in C. Borzaga, J. Defourny (Eds.). The emergence of social enterprise. London, New York: Routledge, 296–311.

European Commission. 2011. Social Business Initiative – Creating a favorable climate for social enterprises, key stakeholders in the social economy and innovation. COM (2011) 682 final. European Commission, Brussels.

EU SILC – EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions [online]. 2016 [cited 15 January 2017]. Available from Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/income-and-living-conditions/data/database

Fan, Z.; Ma, J.; Tian, P. 1999. A subjective and objective integrated approach for the determination of attribute weights, European Journal of Operational Research 112(2): 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00141-6

Giddens, A. 1998. The third way; the renewal of social democracy. Maiden Mass: Polity Press.

Gilbert, N. 2002. Transformation of the Welfare State. The silent surrender of public responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195140745.001.0001

Ginevicius, R. 2011. A new determining method for the criteria weights in multi-criteria evaluation, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10(6): 1067–1095. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622011004713

Hall, A. D. 1989. Matasystems methodology: a new synthesis and unification. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Haugh, H.; Kitson, M. 2007. The third way and the third sector: New Labour’s economic policy and the social economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics 31: 973–994. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem027

Hill, T.; Kothari, T.; Shea, M. 2010. Patterns of meaning in the social entrepreneurship literature: a research platform, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1(1): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442079

Hoogendoorn, B.; Pennings, E.; Thurik, R. 2010. What do we know about social entrepreneurship: an analysis of empirical research, International Review of Entrepreneurship 8(2): 71–112.

Hulgård, L.; Bisballe, T. 2008. Work integration social enterprises in Denmark [online], [cited 25 September 2016]. Available from Internet: http://emes.net/content/uploads/publications/PERSE_WP_04-08_DK.pdf

Hudson, R. 2005. The social economy beyond the local? developmental possibilities, problems and policy considerations, Durham research online [online], [cited 25 September 2016]. Available from Internet: http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19/1/Hudson_social.pdf?DDD14

Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

Hwang, C. L.; Lin, M. J. 1987. Group decision making under multiple criteria: methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61580-1

Iwacewicz-Orlowska, A. 2016. Diversity of poverty in the chosen European Union countries within the period 2006–2014, Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business 34(2): 481–503.

Jati, H. 2012. Comparison of university webometrics ranking using multicriteria decision analysis: TOPSIS and VIKOR method. Paris: World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology.

Jee, D. H.; Kang, J. K. 2000. A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory, Materials and Design 21(3): 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(99)00066-7

Kaynak, S.; Altuntas, S.; Dereli, T. 2017. Comparing the innovation performance of EU candidate countries: an entropy-based TOPSIS approach, Economic Research 30(1): 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1265895

Kerlin, J. 2006. Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: understanding and learning from the differences, Voluntas 17(3): 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2

Keršuliene, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12

Kolin, M. 2013. Main types of social enterprises in Serbia, in S. Cvejić (Ed.). Cooperatives and social enterprises in Europe and in transitional contexts. Belgrade: The Institute for Sociological Research, 79–86.

Koller, V.; Davidsson, P. 2008. Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: a cross-genre study of British policy-making, Discourse & Society 19(3): 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088963

Krylovas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kosareva, N.; Dadelo S. 2014. New KEMIRA Method for determining criteria priority and weights in solving MCDM problem, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 13(6): 1119–1133. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622014500825

Krylovas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kosareva, N. 2016. Multiple criteria decision-making KEMIRA-M method for solution of location alternatives, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 29(1): 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1152560

Kummitha, R. K. R. 2016. Social entrepreneurship as a tool to remedy social exclusion: a win-win scenario?, South Asia Research 36(1): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0262728015615485

Lane, M. D.; Casile, M. 2011. Angels on the head of a pin: The SAC framework for performance measurement in social entrepreneurship ventures, Social Enterprise Journal 7(3): 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111182395

Lenoir, R. 1974. Les Exclus: un Français sur dix. Paris: Seuil.

Lee, M.; Battilana, J.; Wang, T. 2014. Building an infrastructure for empirical research on social enterprise: challenges and opportunities, in J. Short (Ed.). Social Entrepreneurship and Research Methods (Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Volume 9). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 241–264.

Levander, U. 2009. Social exclusion – an analytical aspect of the social enterprise, in 2nd EMES Conference on Social Enterprise, 1–4 July 2009, Trento, Italy.

Levitas, R. 2004. Let’s hear it for Humpty: social exclusion, the third way and cultural capital, Cultural Trends 13(2): 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954896042000267143

Lister, R. 2004. Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Liu, C. C. 2003. Simulating weights restrictions in data envelopment analysis by the subjective and objective integrated approach, Web Journal of Chinese Management Review 6(1): 68–78.

Mair, J.; Martí, I. 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction and delight, Journal of World Business 41(1): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002

Maree, M. 2005. Les effects collectifs de l’insertion. Centre d’Economie Sociale.

McLoughlin, J.; Kaminski, J.; Sodagar, B., Khan, S.; Harris, R.; Arnaudo, G.; Mc Brearty, S. 2009. A strategic approach to social impact measurement of social capital enterprises: the SIMPLE methodology, Social Enterprise Journal 5(2): 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610910981734

McNeill, F.; Weaver, B. 2010. Changing lives? Desistance research and offender management, SCCJR Project Report; No.03/2010. The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.

Nicholls, A. 2005. Measuring impact in social entrepreneurship: new accountabilities to stakeholders and investors?, in ESRC Research Seminar, April 2005, Local Government Research Unit, London.

Nicholls, A. (Ed.). 2006. Social entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable social change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156(2): 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

Parkan, C.; Wu, M. L. 1997. On the equivalence of operational performance measurement and multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Production Research 35(11): 2963–2988. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075497194246

Pekelman, D.; Sen, S. K. 1974. Mathematical programming models for the determination of attribute weights, Management Science 20(7): 1217–1229. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.20.8.1217

Peredo, A. M.; McLean, M. 2006. Social entrepreneurship: a critical review of the concept, Journal of World Business 41(1): 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007

Perista, H.; Nogueira, S. 2006. Profiles and trajectories of participants in European work integration social enterprises, in M. Nyssens (Ed.). Social enterprise: at the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society. London and New York: Routledge, 195–205.

Putnam, R. 1993. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Radović-Marković, M. 2016. Empowering employment of women and marginalized people through entrepreneurship education in Serbia, Journal of Women’s Entrepreneurship and Education 1–2: 3–17.

Rezaei, J. 2015. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, Omega 53: 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009

Roy, B. 1968. Clessement et choix en presence de criteres multiples, RIRO 8: 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/196802V100571

Saaty, T. L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15: 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

Saaty, T. L. 1980. Multicriteria decision making: the analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGrawHill.

Seyfang, G. 2004. Working outside the box: community currencies, time banks and social inclusion, Journal of Social Policy 33(1): 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279403007232

Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communications, The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Shih, H. S.; Syur, H. J.; Lee, E. S. 2007. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making, Mathematical and Computer Modeling 45: 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023

Short, J. C.; Moss, T. W.; Lumpkin, G. T. 2009. Research in social entrepreneurship: past contributions and future opportunities, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 3(2): 161–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.69

Silver, H. 1994. Social exclusion and social solidarity: three paradigms, International Labour Review 133(5–6): 531–578.

Silver, H. 2010. Social inclusion policies: lessons for Australia, Australian Journal of Social Issues 45(2): 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2010.tb00174.x

Simon, M. 1998. L’entreprise d’insertion: à l’épreuve de la réalité économique. Bruxelles: Fondation Roi Baudouin.

Smallbone, D.; Evans, M.; Ekanem, I.; Butters, S. 2001. Researching social enterprise. Report for the Small Business Service, London: SBS.

Srinivasan, V.; Shocker, A. D. 1973. Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgments, Psychonometrica 38(4): 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291490

Spear, R.; Bidet, E. 2005. Social enterprise for work integration in 12 European countries: a descriptive analysis, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 76(2): 195–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1370-4788.2005.00276.x

SORS – Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia 2014. Economic impact of social enterprises [online], [cited 20 December 2015] (database). Available from Internet: http://www.stat.gov.rs/WebSite/Public/PageView.aspx?pKey=520

SORS – Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, SeConS and Group 484. 2014a. Economic Impact of Social Enterprises in the Republic of Serbia [online], [cited 20 December 2015]. Final report on social enterprises. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade. Available from Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=8650&lang=en

Toner, A.; Lyne, I.; Ryan, P. 2008. Reaching the promised land: can social enterprise reduce social exclusion and empower communities?, Education, Knowledge and Economy 2(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496890801953901

Teasdale, S. 2008. Can social enterprise address disadvantage? Evidence from an inner city community, TSRC Working paper no 3.

Van Uden, E.; Kwiesielewicz, M. 2003. Evaluating attribute significance in AHP using Shannon Entropy, in ISAHP 2003, 7–9 August 2003, Bali, Indonesia.

Vidal, I. 2005. Social enterprise and social inclusion: social enterprises in the sphere of work integration, International Journal of Public Administration 28(9–10): 807–825. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-200067347

Vuković, D. 2013. Social Economy, Civil Society and the Serbian Welfare System, in S. Cvejić (Ed.). Cooperatives and social enterprises in Europe and in transitional contexts. Belgrade: The Institute for Sociological Research, 62–78.

Weerawardena, J.; Mort, G. 2006. Investigating social entrepreneurship: a multidimensional model, Journal of World Business 41(1): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001

Yoon, K. P.; Hwang, C. L. 1995. Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. Sage University Paper series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-104. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985161

Yong, D. 2006. Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 28(7–8): 839–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2436-5

Zanakis, S. H.; Solomon, A.; Wishart, N.; Dublish, S. 1998. Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods, European Journal of Operational Research 107(3): 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1

Zeleny, M. 1982. Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Zou, Z. H.; Yun, Y.; Sun, J. N. 2006. Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment indicators, Journal of Environmental Science 18: 1020–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60032-6