Share:


A multi-criteria performance analysis of Initial Public Offering (IPO) firms using CRITIC and VIKOR methods

    Neşe Yalçin Affiliation
    ; Ulaş Ünlü Affiliation

Abstract

As Initial Public Offering (IPO) is a significant milestone in the financial strategy of a firm, this study aims to evaluate performance of IPOs using multiple measures including account­ing-based performance (ABP), value-based performance (VBP) and overall performance (OP) in the pre-and post-IPO periods. Therefore, we present two combined approaches based on a compromise MCDM method-VIKOR and objective weighting methods-CRITIC and MW (Mean Weight) to evaluate and rank IPOs to help shareholders with understanding on how their performance changes under the different measures. Since the compromise solution (one or a set) proposed by VIKOR depends substantially on criteria weights, VIKOR-CRITIC can show more realistic results because of the differential weights assigned to criteria by CRITIC. In this study, a case study is con­ducted in order to evaluate the performance of Turkish IPOs based on ABP, VBP and OP measures using the combined methods. The results show that the compromise solution results obtained by VIKOR-CRITIC may be a guideline for investors in making more profitable investment decisions before leaping into any investment decision.


First published online: 27 Mar 2017

Keyword : initial public offering, accounting-based performance, value-based performance, MCDM, VIKOR, CRITIC, objective weights

How to Cite
Yalçin, N., & Ünlü, U. (2018). A multi-criteria performance analysis of Initial Public Offering (IPO) firms using CRITIC and VIKOR methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 534–560. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1213201
Published in Issue
Mar 20, 2018
Abstract Views
112
PDF Downloads
106
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Aalianvari, A.; Katibeh, H.; Sharifzadeh, M. 2012. Application of fuzzy Delphi AHP method for the estimation and classification of Ghomrud tunnel from groundwater flow hazard, Arab Journal of Geosciences 5(2): 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0172-8

Aggarwal, R.; Leal, R.; Hernandez, L. 1993. The aftermarket performance of initial public offerings in Latin America, Financial Management 22(1): 42–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665964

Ahn, B. S. 2011. Compatible weighting method with rank order centroid: maximum entropy ordered weighted averaging approach, European Journal of Operational Research 212(3): 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.02.017

Alanazi, A. S.; Liu, B. 2013. IPO financial and operating performance: evidence from the six countries of the GCC. Discussion paper series in finance. Australia: Griffith University.

Alanazi, A. S.; Liu, B.; Forster, J. 2011. The financial performance of Saudi Arabian IPOs, International Journal of Islamic and Middle-Eastern Finance and Management 4(2): 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391111144533

Bacidore, J. M.; Boquist, J. A.; Milbourn, T. T.; Thakor, A. V. 1997. The search for the best financial performance measure, Financial Analysts Journal 53(3): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v53.n3.2081

Baležentis, A.; Baležentis, T.; Misiunas, A. 2012. An integrated assessment of Lithuanian economic sectors based on financial ratios and fuzzy MCDM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(1): 34–53. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.656151

Bayrakdaroğlu, A.; Yalçın, N. 2012. Strategic financial performance evaluation of the Turkish Companies Traded on ISE, Ege Academic Review 12(4): 529–539. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2012419514

Borsa İstanbul. 2015. [online], [cited 20 January 2015]. Available from Internet: http://www.borsaistanbul.com

Boston Consulting Group. 2000. New perspectives on value creation: a study of the worlds’ top performers [online], [cited 15 January 2015]. Available from Internet: https://www.bcg.com

Bulgurcu, B. 2013. Financial performance ranking of the automotive industry firms in Turkey: evidence from an entropy-weighted technique, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 4(3): 844–851.

Büyüközkan, G.; Görener, A. 2015. Evaluation of product development partners using an integrated AHP-VIKOR model, Kybernetes 44(2): 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2014-0019

Chacko, G.; Evans, C. L. 2014. Valuation-methods and models in applied corporate finance. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Press.

Chen, G. M.; Firth, M.; Kim, J.-B. 2000. The post-issue market performance of initial public offerings in China’s new stock markets, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 14(4): 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008358609204

Cheng, J. M. S.; Tsao, S. M.; Tsai, W. H.; Tu, H. H. 2007. Will eChannel additions increase the financial performance of the firm?—The evidence from Taiwan, Industrial Marketing Management 36(1): 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.06.011

Chou, Y. C.; Yen, H. Y.; Sun, Y. Y. 2014. An integrate method for performance of women in science and technology based on entropy measure for objective weighting, Quality and Quantity 48(1): 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9756-6

Copeland, T.; Koller, T.; Murin, J. 2000. Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Damodaran, A. 1999. Value creation and enhancement: back to the future. Working paper. New York: New York University Stern School of Business.

Deng, H.; Yeh, C.-H.; Willis, R. J. 2000. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights, Computers and Operations Research 27(10): 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6

Diakoulaki, D.; Mavrotas, G.; Papayannakis, L. 1995. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method, Computers and Operations Research 22(7): 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H

Erasmus, P. D. 2008. Evaluating value based financial performance measures: PhD thesis. Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa, Stellenbosch University.

Ergul, N.; Seyfullahogullari, C. A. 2012. The ranking of retail companies trading in ISE, European Journal of Scientific Research 70(1): 29–37.

Ertuğrul, İ.; Karakaşoğlu, N. 2009. Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods, Expert Systems with Application 36(1): 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014

Gallizo, J. L.; Salvador, M. 2003. Understanding the behavior of financial ratios: the adjustment process, Journal of Economics and Business 55(3): 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(03)00022-5

Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2006. Assessing the financial state of construction enterprises, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(3): 188–194.

Goergen, M.; Renneboog, L. D. R. 2003. Insider retention and long-run performance in German and UK IPO’s. Discussion paper. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.

Helfert, E. A. 2001. Financial analysis tools and techniques. USA: McGraw-Hill Press.

Holthausen, R. W.; Larcker, D. F. 1996. The financial performance of reverse leveraged buyouts, Journal of Financial Economics 42(3): 293–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(96)00884-7

Hsu, L.-C. 2014. A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making model for investment decision making, Journal of Business Economics and Management 15(3): 509–529. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.72256

Hsu, L.-C. 2015. Using a decision-making process to evaluate efficiency and operating performance for listed semiconductor companies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 21(2): 301–331. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.876689

Hwang, C.-L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making – methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. New York: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

Ignatius, J.; Behzadian, M.; Malekan, H. S.; Lalitha, D. 2012. Financial performance of Iran’s automotive sector based on PROMETHEE II, in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT), 11–13 June 2012, Bali, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2012.6225775

Jahan, A.; Mustapha, F.; Sapuan, S. M.; Ismail, M. Y.; Bahraminasab, M. 2012. A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 58(1–4): 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3366-7

Jain, B. A.; Kini, O. 1994. The post-issue operating performance of IPO firms, The Journal of Finance 49(5): 1699–1726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04778.x

Kang, D.; Park, Y. 2014. Review-based measurement of customer satisfaction in mobile service: sentiment analysis and VIKOR approach, Expert Systems with Applications 41(4): 1041–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.101

Kaplan, S. 1989. The effects of management buyouts on operating performance and value, Journal of Financial Economics 24(2): 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90047-0

Kazan H.; Özdemir, Ö. 2014. Financial performance assessment of large scale conglomerates via TOP¬SIS and critic methods, Journal of Management and Sustainability 3(4): 203–224.

Kim, K. A.; Kitsabunnarat, P.; Nofsinger, J. R. 2004. Ownership and operating performance in an emerging market: evidence from Thai IPO firms, Journal of Corporate Finance 10(3): 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00019-6

Lee, S.; Kim, W. G. 2009. EVA, refined EVA, MVA, or traditional performance measures for the hospi¬tality industry?, International Journal of Hospitality Management 28(3): 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.01.004

Liu, H. C.; You, J. X.; You, X. Y.; Shan, M. M. 2015. A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method, Applied Soft Computing 28: 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.036

Liu, H.-C.; Liu, L.; Wu, J. 2013. Material selection using an interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method considering subjective and objective weights, Materials and Design 52: 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.054

Loughran, T.; Ritter, J. R. 1995. The new issues puzzle, The Journal of Finance 50(1): 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05166.x

Lye, A. C. L. 1999. The long- run operating performance of IPO firms in Australia: Honours thesis. Australia, The University of Queensland.

Madden, B. J. 2003. Cash Flow Return On Investment (CFROI) valuation: a total system approach to valuing the firm. Burlington, England: Butterworth‐Heinemann.

Mardani, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Govindan, K.; Amat Senin, A.; Jusoh, A. 2016. VIKOR technique: a systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications, Sustainability 8(1): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010037

Martin, J. D.; Petty, J. W. 2000. Value based management: the corporate response to the shareholder revolu¬tion. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Megginson, W. L.; Nash, R. C.; Randenborgh, M. V. 1994. The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: an international empirical analysis, The Journal of Finance 49(2): 403–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb05147.x

Mikkelson, W. H.; Partch, M. M.; Shah, K. 1997. Ownership and operating performance of companies that go public, Journal of Financial Economics 44(3): 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00006-8

Opricovic, S. 1998. Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems: PhD dissertation. Belgrade, Faculty of Civil Engineering.

Opricovic, S. 2011. Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning, Expert Systems with Applications 38(10): 12983–12990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097

Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156(2): 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

Palepu, K. G.; Healy, P. M.; Bernard, V. L. 2000. Business analysis and valuation: using financial state¬ments. Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing.

Public Disclosure Platform. 2015. [online], [cited 10 January 2015]. Available from Internet: https://www.kap.org.tr/

Rekik, Y. M.; Boujelbene, Y. 2013. Tunisian IPOs underpricing and long-run underperformance: highlight and explanation, Journal of Business Management and Economics 4(4): 93–104.

Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Undersecretariat of Treasury. 2015. [online], [cited 10 January 2015]. Available from Internet: http://www.treasury.gov.tr

Rezaie, K.; Ramiyani, S. S.; Nazari-Shirkouhi, S.; Badizadeh, A. 2014. Evaluating performance of Iranian cement firms using an integrated fuzzy AHP–VIKOR method, Applied Mathematical Modelling 38(21–22): 5033–5046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.003

Ritter, J. R. 1991. The long-run performance of initial public offerings, The Journal of Finance 46(1): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03743.x

Rostamzadeh, R.; Ismail, K.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2014. Multi criteria decision making for assisting business angels in investments, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20(4): 696–720. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.9843

Safaei Ghadikolaei, A.; Khalili Esbouei, S.; Antucheviciene, J. 2014. Applying fuzzy MCDM for financial performance evaluation of Iranian companies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 20(2): 274–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.913274

Shemshadi, A.; Shirazi, H.; Toreihi, M.; Tarokh, M. J. 2011. A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting, Expert Systems with Applications 38(10): 12160–12167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.027

Stewart, G. B. 1990. The quest for value: the EVA management guide. New York: Harper Business.

Stewart, G. B. 1991. The quest for value: a guide for senior managers. New York: Harper Business.

Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2010. A novel method for multiple criteria analysis: Grey Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS-G) method, Informatica 21(4): 597–610.

Tzeng, G. H.; Chen, T. Y.; Wang, J. C. 1998. A weight-assessing method with habitual domains, European Journal of Operational Research 110(2): 342–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00246-4

Urbanczyk, E.; Midoduchowska-Jaroszewicz, E.; Szczesna-Urbaniak, A. 2005. Economic value added versus cash value added: the case of companies in transitional economy, Poland, International Journal of Banking and Finance 3(1): 107–117.

Wang, C. 2005. Ownership and operating performance of Chinese IPOs, Journal of Banking and Finance 29(7): 1835–1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.07.003

Wang, J. J.; Jing, Y. Y.; Zhang, C. F.; Zhao, J. H. 2009. Review on multi-criteria decision aid in sustainable energy decision-making, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(9): 2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021

Wang, Y. J. 2014. The evaluation of financial performance for Taiwan container shipping companies by fuzzy TOPSIS, Applied Soft Computing 22: 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.021

Wang, Y. J.; Lee, H. S. 2010. Evaluating financial performance of Taiwan container shipping companies by strength and weakness indices, International Journal of Computer Mathematics 87(1): 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000701489412

Yalama, A.; Ünlü, U. 2010. The calendar anomalies in IPO returns: evidence from Turkey, Journal of Economics Business and Finance 25(286): 89–109.

Yalçın, N.; Bayrakdaroglu, A.; Kahraman, C. 2012. Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries, Expert Systems with Applications 39(1): 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.024

You, X. Y.; You, J. X.; Liu, H. C.; Zhen, L. 2015. Group multi-criteria supplier selection using an ex¬tended VIKOR method with interval 2-tuple linguistic information, Expert Systems with Applica¬tions 42(4): 1906–1916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.004

Young, S. D.; O’Byrne, S. F. 2001. EVA and value-based management: a practical guide to implementa¬tion. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Yu, P. L. 1973. A class of solutions for group decision problems, Management Science 19(8): 936–946. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.19.8.936

Yurdakul, M.; İç, Y. T. 2003. An illustrative study aimed to measure and rank performance of Turkish automotive companies using TOPSIS, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 18(1): 1–18.

Zardari, N. H.; Ahmed, K.; Shirazi, S. M.; Yusop, Z. B. 2015. Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management. Springer Briefs in Water Science and Technology, Springer International Publishing.

Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2011. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(2): 397–427. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291

Zeleny, M. 1982. Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.