Share:


Vehicle–pedestrian interactions into and outside of crosswalks: effects of driver assistance systems

Abstract

This study aimed to analyse the driver’s behaviour during the interaction with a pedestrian crossing into and outside the zebra crossing, and evaluate the effectiveness of two kinds of Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) that provided to the driver an auditory alert, and a visual alert to detect the pedestrian. 42 participants joined the experiment conducted using the fixed-base driving simulator of the Department of Engineering (Roma Tre University). They experienced different crossing conditions (legal and illegal) and ADAS conditions (no ADAS, visual warning and auditory warning) in an urban scenario. The parameters Time-To-Arrive (TTA) and Speed Reduction Time (SRT) were obtained from the drivers’ speed profiles in the last 150 m in advance of the conflict point with the pedestrian. Results clearly showed the criticality of illegal crossings. When the pedestrian crossed outside of the crosswalk, the highest number of collision occurred and the ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA) returned significant effects on both the dependent variables TTA and SRT, highlighting the higher criticality of the vehicle–pedestrian interaction and the more abrupt yielding manoeuvre. Positive effects (the vehicle–pedestrian interaction was less critical and the yielding manoeuvre was smoother) emerged for both the driver assistance systems, although not statistically significant. Besides, both the driver assistance systems positively affected the behaviour of the average cautious drivers. No significant effects of the warning systems were recorded on the aggressive drivers, which because of their behavioural characteristics ignored the warning alarm. In addition, no significant effects of the warning systems were recorded for the very cautious drivers, which adjusted their behaviour even before the alarm trigger. Finally, the outcomes of the questionnaire submitted to the participants highlighted the clear preference for the auditory warning, probably because of the different physical stimuli that are solicited by the warning signal. The results confirm that adequate pedestrian paths should be planned to avoid jaywalker conditions, which induce the driver to assume critical driving behaviour and provide useful findings of the effectiveness of driver assistance systems for pedestrian detection.

Keyword : pedestrian, driver’s behaviour, driving simulator, ADAS, road safety, human factors

How to Cite
Bella, F., & Silvestri, M. (2021). Vehicle–pedestrian interactions into and outside of crosswalks: effects of driver assistance systems. Transport, 36(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2021.14739
Published in Issue
Apr 30, 2021
Abstract Views
77
PDF Downloads
67
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Ābele, L.; Haustein, S.; Martinussen, L. M.; Moller, M. 2019. Improving drivers’ hazard perception in pedestrian-related situations based on a short simulator-based intervention, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 62: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.12.013

Bakhtiari, S.; Zhang, T.; Zafian, T.; Samuel, S.; Knodler, M.; Fitzpatrick, C.; Fisher, D. L. 2019. Effect of visual and auditory alerts on older drivers’ glances toward latent hazards while turning left at intersections, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2673(9): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119844244

Bella, F. 2008. Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads, Accident Analysis & Prevention 40(3): 1078–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.10.015

Bella, F.; Nobili, F. 2020. Driver–pedestrian interaction under legal and illegal pedestrian crossings, Transportation Research Procedia 45: 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.038

Bella, F.; Silvestri, M. 2016. Driver’s braking behavior approaching pedestrian crossings: a parametric duration model of the speed reduction times, Journal of Advanced Transportation 50(4): 630–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1366

Bella, F.; Silvestri, M. 2015. Effects of safety measures on driver’s speed behavior at pedestrian crossings, Accident Analysis & Prevention 83: 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.016

Bella, F.; Silvestri, M. 2017a. Effects of directional auditory and visual warnings at intersections on reaction times and speed reduction times, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 51: 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.09.006

Bella, F.; Silvestri, M. 2017b. Interaction driver–bicyclist on rural roads: Effects of cross-sections and road geometric elements, Accident Analysis & Prevention 102: 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.008

Butakov, V. A.; Ioannou, P. 2015. Personalized driver/vehicle lane change models for ADAS, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 64(10): 4422–4431. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2014.2369522

Chai, J.; Zhao, G. 2016. Effect of exposure to aggressive stimuli on aggressive driving behavior at pedestrian crossings at unmarked roadways, Accident Analysis & Prevention 88: 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.026

Chen, H.; Cao, L.; Logan, D. B. 2011. Investigation into the effect of an intersection crash warning system on driving performance in a simulator, Traffic Injury Prevention 12(5): 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2011.603169

Deb, S.; Strawderman, L.; DuBien, J.; Smith, B.; Carruth, D. W.; Garrison, T. M. 2017. Evaluating pedestrian behavior at crosswalks: validation of a pedestrian behavior questionnaire for the U.S. population, Accident Analysis & Prevention 106: 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.020

Domenichini, L.; Branzi, V.; Smorti, M. 2019. Influence of drivers’ psychological risk profiles on the effectiveness of traffic calming measures, Accident Analysis & Prevention 123: 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.025

ERSO. 2018. Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2018 – Main Figures. European Road Safety Observatory (ERSO). 21 p. Available from Internet: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/statistics/dacota/bfs2018_main_figures.pdf

Fisher, D.; Garay-Vega, L. 2012. Advance yield markings and drivers’ performance in response to multiple-threat scenarios at mid-block crosswalks, Accident Analysis & Prevention 44(1): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.030

Fuller, R. 1984. A conceptualization of driving behaviour as threat avoidance, Ergonomics 27(11): 1139–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138408963596

Geronimo, D.; Sappa, A. D.; Ponsa, D.; Lopez, A. M. 2010. 2D–3D-based on-board pedestrian detection system, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 114(5): 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2009.07.008

GHSA. 2018. Pedestrian Traffic Fatalities by State: 2018 Preliminary Data. Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA), Washington, DC, US. 42 p. Available from Internet: https://www.ghsa.org/sites/default/files/2019-02/FINAL_Pedestrians19.pdf

Gray, R. 2011. Looming auditory collision warnings for driving, Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53(1): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810397833

Haas, E. C.; Van Erp, J. B. F. 2014. Multimodal warnings to enhance risk communication and safety, Safety Science 61: 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.011

Hajiseyedjavadi, F.; Zhang, T.; Agrawal, R.; Knodler, M.; Fisher, D.; Samuel, S. 2018. Effectiveness of visual warnings on young drivers hazard anticipation and hazard mitigation abilities, Accident Analysis & Prevention 116: 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.037

Haque, M. M.; Washington, S. 2015. The impact of mobile phone distraction on the braking behaviour of young drivers: a hazard-based duration model, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 50: 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.07.011

IIHS-HLDI. 2021a. Fatality Facts 2019: Bicyclists. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute (IIHS-HLDI), Arlington, VA, US. Available from Internet: https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/bicyclists

IIHS-HLDI. 2021b. Fatality Facts 2019: Pedestrians. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute (IIHS-HLDI), Arlington, VA, US. Available from Internet: https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/pedestrians

Iryo-Asano, M.; Alhajyaseen, W. K. M. 2017. Modeling pedestrian crossing speed profiles considering speed change behavior for the safety assessment of signalized intersections, Accident Analysis & Prevention 108: 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.028

ISTAT. 2018. Road Accidents: Year 2017. Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT), Rome, Italy. 11 p. Available from Internet: http://www.aci.it/fileadmin/documenti/studi_e_ricerche/dati_statistiche/incidenti/Road_accidents_in_Italy_-_2017.pdf

Lee, J. D.; McGehee, D. V.; Brown, T. L.; Reyes, M. L. 2002. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator, Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44(2): 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497844

Lobjois, R.; Benguigui, N.; Cavallo, V. 2013. The effects of age and traffic density on street-crossing behavior, Accident Analysis & Prevention 53: 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.028

Lobjois, R.; Cavallo, V. 2007. Age-related differences in streetcrossing decisions: the effects of vehicle speed and time constraints on gap selection in an estimation task, Accident Analysis & Prevention 39(5): 934–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.013

Maag, C.; Schneider, N.; Lubbeke, T.; Weisswange, T. H.; Goerick, C. 2015. Car gestures – advisory warning using additional steering wheel angles, Accident Analysis & Prevention 83: 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.020

Martinez, C. M.; Heucke, M.; Wang, F.-Y.; Gao, B.; Cao, D. 2018. Driving style recognition for intelligent vehicle control and advanced driver assistance: a survey, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 19(3): 666–676. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2017.2706978

MiMS. 2001. Decreto Ministeriale del 5/11/2001 Norme funzionali e geometriche per la costruzione delle strade. Ministero delle infrastrutture e della mobilita sostenibili (MiMS), Roma, Italia. (in Italian).

MiMS. 1992. Nuovo codice della strada, Decreto Legislativo 30 aprile 1992 N. 285 e successive modificazioni. Ministero delle infrastrutture e della mobilita sostenibili (MiMS), Roma, Italia. (in Italian).

Mitman, M. F.; Cooper, D.; Dubose, B. 2010. Driver and pedestrian behavior at uncontrolled crosswalks in Tahoe basin recreation area of California, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2198: 23–31. https://doi.org/10.3141/2198-04

Mollu, K.; Cornu, J.; Brijs, K.; Pirdavani, A.; Brijs, T. 2018. Driving simulator study on the influence of digital illuminated billboards near pedestrian crossings, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour F 59: 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.013

Obeid, H.; Abkarian, H.; Abou-Zeid, M.; Kaysi, I. 2017. Analyzing driver–pedestrian interaction in a mixed-street environment using a driving simulator, Accident Analysis & Prevention 108: 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.005

Petzoldt, T. 2014. On the relationship between pedestrian gap acceptance and time to arrival estimates, Accident Analysis & Prevention 72: 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.019

Ryan, A.; Casola, E.; Fitzpatrick, C.; Knodler, M. 2019. Flashing yellow arrows for right turn applications: A driving simulator study and static evaluation analysis, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 66: 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.013

Scott, J. J.; Gray, R. 2008. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving, Human Factors: the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50(2): 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008x250674

Shaaban, K.; Muley, D.; Mohammed, A. 2018. Analysis of illegal pedestrian crossing behavior on a major divided arterial road, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 54: 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.012

Shaaban, K.; Muley, D.; Mohammed, A. 2019. Modeling pedestrian gap acceptance behavior at a six-lane urban road, Journal of Transportation Safety & Security. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2019.1691100

Spicer, R.; Vahabaghaie, A.; Bahouth, G.; Drees, L.; Von Bulow, R. M.; Baur, P. 2018. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems, Traffic Injury Prevention 19: S91–S95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1527030

Tezcan, H. O.; Elmorssy, M.; Aksoy, G. 2019. Pedestrian crossing behavior at midblock crosswalks, Journal of Safety Research 71: 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.014

Toxopeus, R.; Attalla, S.; Kodsi, S.; Oliver, M. 2018. Driver response time to midblock crossing pedestrians, SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0514. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0514

Tornros, J. 1998. Driving behaviour in a real and a simulated road tunnel – a validation study, Accident Analysis & Prevention 30(4): 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00099-7

Van Houten, R.; Malenfant, L.; Blomberg, R. D.; Huitema, B. E.; Casella, S. 2013. High-Visibility Enforcement on Driver Compliance with Pedestrian Right-of-Way Laws. Report No DOT HS 811 786. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Washington, DC, US. 78 p. Available from Internet: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/811786.pdf

Varhelyi, A. 1998. Drivers’ speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study, Accident Analysis & Prevention 30(6): 731–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00026-8

Wang, M.; Liao, Y.; Lundgren Lyckvi, S.; Chen, F. 2020. How drivers respond to visual vs. auditory information in advisory traffic information systems, Behaviour & Information Technology 39(12): 1308–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2019.1667439

Werneke, J.; Vollrath, M. 2013. How to present collision warnings at intersections? A comparison of different approaches, Accident Analysis & Prevention 52: 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.001

WHO. 2018. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018. World Health Organisation (WHO). 403 p. Available from Internet: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684

Wickens, C. D.; Hollands, J. G.; Banbury, S.; Parasuraman, R. 2012. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Psychology Press. 544 p.

Yan, X.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y. 2015a. Effect of audio in-vehicle red light–running warning message on driving behavior based on a driving simulator experiment, Traffic Injury Prevention 16(1): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.906038

Yan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, L. 2015b. The influence of in-vehicle speech warning timing on drivers’ collision avoidance performance at signalized intersections, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 51: 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.003

Zafri, N. M.; Rony, A. I.; Adri, N. 2020. Study on pedestrian compliance behavior at vehicular traffic signals and trafficpolice-controlled intersections, International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research 18(3): 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-019-00208-y

Zhang, Y.; Yan, X.; Yang, Z. 2015. Discrimination of effects between directional and nondirectional information of auditory warning on driving behavior, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2015: 980281. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/980281

Zheng, Y.; Chase, T.; Elefteriadou, L.; Schroeder, B.; Sisiopiku, V. P. 2015. Modeling vehicle–pedestrian interactions outside of crosswalks, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 59: 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2015.08.005

Zhou, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Pu, Z.; Xu, Y. 2019. Simulation of pedestrian behavior during the flashing green signal using a modified social force model, Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 15(2): 1019–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2018.1559895

Zhuang, X.; Wu, C. 2018. Display of required crossing speed improves pedestrian judgment of crossing possibility at clearance phase, Accident Analysis & Prevention 112: 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.022

Zhuang, X.; Wu, C. 2011. Pedestrians’ crossing behaviors and safety at unmarked roadway in China, Accident Analysis & Prevention 43(6): 1927–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.005

Zhuang, X.; Wu, C. 2012. The safety margin and perceived safety of pedestrians at unmarked roadway, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 15(2): 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.11.005

Zhuang, X.; Wu, C.; Ma, S. 2018. Cross or wait? Pedestrian decision making during clearance phase at signalized intersections, Accident Analysis & Prevention 111: 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.019