Share:


Under which conditions is carrier cooperation possible? A case study in a Seville marketplace

Abstract

The high volume of traffic originates two well-known problems in many cities: congestion and pollution. In recent years, a social phenomenon is emerging cooperation. This work is aimed at evaluating the circumstances under which transport cooperation is possible between different stakeholders operating in the same geographical area. To this end, a double survey process was conducted in a marketplace situated in the Seville City (Spain) centre. The first survey was designed to know the characteristics of the retailers and their preferences with respect to cooperation and regulations. A relational analysis between retailer features and their willingness to cooperate was carried out. After analysing the motivations for non-cooperation, a mixed proposal was designed and surveyed. Although the research was limited to a marketplace, the relevant data gathered from this double survey process highlights some implications: (a) the importance of personal relations in retailer cooperation; (b) a high volume of freight and the use of vans as on-street warehouses appear as significant motivations for non-cooperation; (c) forcing changes in the statu quo encourages cooperation.

Keyword : city logistics, city transport, cooperation, regulation, stakeholder group

How to Cite
Muñuzuri, J., Escudero-Santana, A., & Aparicio-Ruiz, P. (2018). Under which conditions is carrier cooperation possible? A case study in a Seville marketplace. Transport, 33(4), 881-889. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6590
Published in Issue
Dec 5, 2018
Abstract Views
1
PDF Downloads
1
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Bengtsson, M.; Kock, S. 1999. Cooperation and competition in relationships between competitors in business network, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 14(3): 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629910272184

Chen, Q.; Lin, J.; Kawamura, K. 2012. Comparison of urban cooperative delivery and direct delivery strategies, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2288: 28–39. https://doi.org/10.3141/2288-04

Cruijssen, F.; Dullaert, W.; Fleuren, H. 2007. Horizontal cooperation in transport and logistics: a literature review, Transportation Journal 46(3): 22–39.

Dablanc, L; Diziain, D.; Levifve, H. 2011. Urban freight consultations in the Paris region, European Transport Research Review 3(1): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-011-0049-2

EC. 2001. Guidelines on the Applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to Horizontal Cooperation Agreements. 29 p. Available from Internet: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32001Y0106(01)&from=EN

Forza, C. 2008. Surveys, in C. Karlsson (Ed.). Researching Operations Management, 84–161.

Gammelgaard, B. 2015. The emergence of city logistics: the case of Copenhagen’s Citylogistik-kbh, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 45(4): 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2014-0291

Gonzalez-Feliu, J.; Morana, J.; Salanova Grau, J.-M.; Ma, T.-Y. 2013. Design and scenario assessment for collaborative logistics and freight transport systems, International Journal of Transport Economics 40(2): 207–240.

Gonzalez-Feliu, J.; Salanova, J.-M. 2012. Defining and evaluating collaborative urban freight transportation systems, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 39: 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.099

Jaller, M.; Holguín-Veras, J.; Hodge, S. D. 2013. Parking in the city: challenges for freight traffic, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2379: 46–56. https://doi.org/10.3141/2379-06

Jaržemskis, A. 2007. Research on public logistics centre as tool for cooperation, Transport 22(1): 50–54.

Karlsson, C. 2008. Researching Operations Management. Routledge. 336 p.

Lindholm, M; Browne, M. 2013. Local authority cooperation with urban freight stakeholders: a comparison of partnership approaches, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 13(1): 20–38.

Marcucci, E.; Gatta, V. 2014. Behavioral modeling of urban freight transport, in J. Gonzalez-Feliu, F. Semet, J.-L. Routhier (Eds.). Sustainable Urban Logistics: Concepts, Methods and Information Systems, 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31788-0_12

Marcucci, E.; Gatta, V.; Stathopoulos, A.; Valeri, E. 2011. Designing an Efficient Stated Ranking Experiment for Ex-Ante Urban Freight Policy Evaluation in a Three Agent Type Context: Retailers, Own-Account and Carriers. 18 p. Available from Internet: http://www.sietitalia.org/wpsiet/WP-SIET-EMarucci-Vgatta-AStathopoulos-EValeri2011.pdf

Mingardo, G.; Van Wee, B.; Rye, T. 2015. Urban parking policy in Europe: a conceptualization of past and possible future trends, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 74: 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.005

Muñuzuri, J.; Cortés, P.; Guadix, J.; Onieva, L. 2012. City logistics in Spain: why it might never work, Cities 29(2): 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.03.004

Muñuzuri, J.; Larrañeta, J.; Onieva, L.; Cortés, P. 2005. Solutions applicable by local administrations for urban logistics improvement, Cities 22(1): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.10.003

Muñuzuri, J.; Onieva, L.; Cortés, P.; Guadix, J. 2016. Stakeholder segmentation: different views inside the carriers group, Transportation Research Procedia 12: 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.050

Österle, I; Aditjandra, P. T.; Vaghi, C.; Grea, G.; Zunder, T. H. 2015. The role of a structured stakeholder consultation process within the establishment of a sustainable urban supply chain, Supply Chain Management: an International Journal 20(3): 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2014-0149

Pan, S.; Ballot, E.; Fontane, F.; Hakimi, D. 2014. Environmental and economic issues arising from the pooling of SMEs’ supply chains: case study of the food industry in western France, Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal 26(1–2): 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-012-9162-3

Pomponi, F.; Fratocchi, L.; Tafuri, S. R. 2015. Trust development and horizontal collaboration in logistics: a theory based evolutionary framework, Supply Chain Management: an International Journal 20(1): 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2014-0078

Razzaque, M. A; Sheng, C. C. 1998. Outsourcing of logistics functions: a literature survey, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 28(2): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039810221667

Saeed, N. 2013. Cooperation among freight forwarders: mode choice and intermodal freight transport, Research in Transportation Economics 42(1): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.11.005

Skjoett-Larsen, T. 2000. Third party logistics – from an interor-ganizational point of view, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 30(2): 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030010318838

Verlinde, S.; Macharis, C.; Witlox, F. 2012. How to consolidate urban flows of goods without setting up an urban consolidation centre?, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 39: 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.140