Share:


An approach to the legal requirements regarding railway transport safety monitoring in the European Union

Abstract

The targeted liberalisation of the European Union railway market in 1998 could have lead to a decrease in the safety of rail transport. To prevent this, the European Commission developed and implemented new requirements in this area without explicitly deciding on the methods and tools to be used for their implementation. Entities operating in the market faced a new challenge, the development of a systems model approach to safety management. Only a correctly designed process model, along with the appropriate tools for monitoring and managing risk, allows the level of safety to be maintained at current levels or improved. As part of the research, solutions were developed for a systems approach to safety management in railway transport and the risk management and maintenance monitoring of railway vehicles. Safety is an essential criterion for assessing the functioning of a railway system, it determines its efficiency as well as – in a widely understood sense – the quality of its transport services. This paper describes the legal requirements and practical methods of implementation arising from the issue of Directive 2004/49/EC as it concerns the monitoring of railway safety (Chruzik et al. 2014). The directive enforces the gradual introduction of Common Safety Targets (CST) and Common Safety Methods (CSM) to maintain (or increase) the existing high safety levels after the opening up (liberalisation) of the rail market. The introduction of CST and CSM necessitates the development of methods for the evaluation of the level of safety and activity of operators, both at the level of the Member States and also at the level of the European Union. The paper describes the practical solutions developed for railway operators as part of the implementation of maintenance management systems (Sitarz et al. 2013; Chruzik et al. 2014).

Keyword : railway transport, reliability, analysis, vehicle, transport management

How to Cite
Sitarz, M., & Chruzik, K. (2019). An approach to the legal requirements regarding railway transport safety monitoring in the European Union. Transport, 34(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.8528
Published in Issue
Feb 22, 2019
Abstract Views
172
PDF Downloads
151
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Ale, B. J. M. 2002. Risk assessment practices in the Netherlands, Safety Science 40(1–4): 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00044-3

Aven, T. 1992. Reliability and Risk Analysis. Springer. 346 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2858-2

Chruzik, K.; Sitarz, M.; Graboń M. 2014. Zastosowanie analizy czynnikowej w procesie monitorowania utrzymania pojazdów kolejowych, Logistyka 3: 1048–1053. (in Polish).

EU. 2013. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on the Common Safety Method for Risk Evaluation and Assessment and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 352/2009. 18 p. Available from Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2013/402/oj

EU. 2009. Commission Regulation (EC) No 352/2009 of 24 April 2009 on the Adoption of a Common Safety Method on Risk Evaluation and Assessment as Referred to in Article 6(3)(a) of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. 16 p. Available from Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/352/oj

EU. 2012a. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1077/2012 of 16 November 2012 on a Common Safety Method for Supervision by National Safety Authorities after Issuing a Safety Certificate or Safety Authorisation. 5 p. Available from Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/1077/oj

EU. 2012b. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1078/2012 of 16 November 2012 on a Common Safety Method for Monitoring to be Applied by Railway Undertakings, Infrastructure Managers after Receiving a Safety Certificate or Safety Authorisation and by Entities in Charge of Maintenance. 6 p. Available from Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/1078/oj

EU. 2011. Commission Regulation (EU) No 445/2011 of 10 May 2011 on a System of Certification of Entities in Charge of Maintenance for Freight Wagons and Amending Regulation (EC) No 653/2007. 25 p. Available from Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/445/oj

EU. 2010a. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1158/2010 of 9 December 2010 on a Common Safety Method for Assessing Conformity with the Requirements for Obtaining Railway Safety Certificates. 14 p. Available from Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2010/1158/oj

EU. 2010b. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10 December 2010 on a Common Safety Method for Assessing Conformity with the Requirements for Obtaining a Railway Safety Authorisation. 13 p. Available from Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2010/1169/oj

EU. 2008. Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the Interoperability of the Rail System within the Community. 45 p. Available from Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/57/oj

EU. 2004. Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on Safety on the Community’s Railways and Amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the Licensing of Railway Undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the Allocation of Railway Infrastructure Capacity and the Levying of Charges for the Use of Railway Infrastructure and Safety Certification. 70 p. Available from Internet: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2004/49/oj

Greenberg, H. R.; Cramer, J. J. I991. Risk Assessment and Risk Management for the Chemical Process Industry. Wiley. 392 p.

Haight, F. A. 1986. Risk, especially risk of traffic accident, Accident Analysis & Prevention 18(5): 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(86)90009-6

HSE. 1998. 5 Steps to Risk Assessment: Case Studies. Health and Safety Executive (HSE). HSE Books. 36 p.

ISO/IEC 17020:2012. Conformity Assessment. Requirements for the Operation of Various Types of Bodies Performing Inspection.

Kinney, G. F.; Wiruth, A. D. 1976. Practical Risk Analysis for Safety Management. Report No NWC-TP-5865. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, CA, US. 25 p.

Kontovas, C. A.; Psaraftis, H. N. 2009. Formal safety assessment: a critical review, Marine Technology 46(1): 45–59.

Li, W.-C.; Harris, D.; Yu, C.-S. 2008. Routes to failure: Analysis of 41 civil aviation accidents from the Republic of China using the human factors analysis and classification system, Accident Analysis & Prevention 40(2): 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.011

Luxhøj, J. T. 2003. Probabilistic causal analysis for system safety risk assessments in commercial air transport, in Second Workshop on the Investigation and Reporting of Incidents and Accidents, IRIA 2003, 16–19 September 2003, Williamsburg, Virginia, US, 17–38.

PMI. 2013. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. 5th edition. Project Management Institute (PMI), Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, US. 616 p.

PN-EN 50126:2002. Railway Applications. The Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS).

Sitarz, M.; Chruzik, K.; Graboń, M.; Gamon, W. 2013. Stan bezpieczeństwa na kolei w Unii Europejskiej 2013, Technika transportu szynowego 20(9): 45–55. (in Polish).