The journal provides its’ policies, which include detailed information about submission, editorial and publishing processes and guidelines for authors and reviewers. All parties are being introduced with their rights and responsibilities to ensure smooth and ethical publishing process. Visit following subsections for more details on each policy:
All authors are responsible for ensuring that:
Non-compliance with any of the above conditions will be considered misconduct and dealt with accordingly. Equally, if authors are found guilty of infringing any of the above, the publisher reserves the right to charge the authors with costs which the journal incurs for their manuscript at the discretion of the Journal’s Editors and the publisher.
The journal invites external experts (not only Editorial Board members) to review each article that is considered suitable for consideration. The publication decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief after receiving at least two external reviewer reports with recommendations.
Authors are encouraged to suggest suitable reviewers, but the Editor-in-Chief and the editorial office reserves the right to select different reviewers. The reason for asking authors to suggest reviewers is that they are best placed to know who is an expert in the field. In addition, the suggested reviewers may be suitable for other articles on the same topic. Therefore, obtaining these names can help the editorial office to ensure that it is approaching suitable people to review all articles.
The journal uses double-blind peer review (neither the authors nor the reviewers know the identity of each other) to avoid bias.
On receipt of at least two reviews, the Editor-in-Chief will make a decision of (1) accept, (2) minor revision, (3) major revision, or (4) reject. The reasons for the decision will be communicated to the authors.
When the decision of minor/major revision is made, and the authors do not revise their articles satisfactorily after receiving reviewer reports, then the Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject the article. When revised articles are received they will either be sent out for further review or the Editor-in-Chief will make a decision depending on the level of revision requested.
The time to review and make a decision is extremely variable since it is sometimes difficult to find suitable reviewers, and there may be delays in receiving reviewer reports. The Editor-in-Chief and editorial office make all efforts to minimize the time from submission to first decision. The journal aims to make a first decision (after review) within 40–60 days, but cannot guarantee this.
Note that articles that do not report original research (e.g. letters to the editor, editorials) are not externally reviewed and the Editor-in-Chief makes the decision to publish.
Also the journal is supported by the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences. As Vilnius Gediminas Technical University in partnership with the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences is implementing European Union project “Publication and Coordination of Scientific Periodicals, 2016–2019”.
Read more about the project
However, the majority of the cost of publication is funded by Article Publication Charges (APCs) paid by authors or their institutes. These are levied for all VGTU journals and cover the costs of publication to allow for articles to be made freely available Open Access to all readers, anywhere in the world.
APC for the journal is € 50 / per page net. This charge includes all costs of the review process, systems, typesetting, web publication and long-term archiving. Minimum manuscript extent is 6 pages.
Special note regarding Sales Tax and VAT for authors
Article processing charges (APCs) associated with open access publication are subject to VAT at the standard Lithuanian VAT rate of 21%.
Authors will have VAT charged in their bill.
If an institution will be the payer, authors should indicate Tax (VAT) ID of their institution and VAT will be excluded from the sum.