Share:


Critical success factors of a bottom up urban design process to deliver sustainable urban designs

    Nuwan Dias Affiliation
    ; Kaushal Keraminiyage Affiliation
    ; Dilanthi Amaratunga Affiliation
    ; Steve Curwell Affiliation

Abstract

A sustainable urban environment caters for peoples’ need. When the needs of the people are addressed, it increases the property values and attracts investors. The current urban design process is top-down, i.e., Designers and planners play the key role and the community has less engagement. There are serious criticisms of this process as it may not touch the “ground” level requirements, and therefore, these projects will fail to create sustainable environments. Accordingly, to overcome the drawbacks of the current top-down process, researches have discussed implementing a bottom-up process in order to deliver sustainable urban designs. Based on this argument this paper discusses what are the positive and negative implications of a bottom up urban design process and what are the critical success factors which can be derived from a bottom-up urban design process in order to deliver sustainable urban environments.

Keyword : bottom-up, urban design process, sustainable urban design, critical success factors, community engagement

How to Cite
Dias, N., Keraminiyage, K., Amaratunga, D., & Curwell, S. (2018). Critical success factors of a bottom up urban design process to deliver sustainable urban designs. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 22(4), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2018.3683
Published in Issue
Jul 12, 2018
Abstract Views
73
PDF Downloads
54
SM Downloads
16
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Adair, A., Berry, J., McGreal, S., Hutchison, N., Watkins, C., & Gibb, K. (2003). Urban regeneration and property investment performance. Journal of Property Research, 20, 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0959991042000181994

Batty, M. (2008). Cities as complex systems: scaling, interaction, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies. In R. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. New York: Springer.

Bowden, L. W. (1972). How to define neighborhood. Professional Geographer, 24(3), 227-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1972.00227.x

Boyko, C. T., Cooper, R., Davey, C. L., & Wootton, A. B. (2006). Addressing sustainability early in the urban design process. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17, 689-706. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830610702520

Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (2003). Public spaces – urban spaces: the dimensions of urban design. Oxford: Elsevier.

Chaskin, R. J. (1997). Perspectives on neighborhood and community: a review of the literature. Social Service Review, 71(4), 521-547. https://doi.org/10.1086/604277

Cliff, E. (2014). Process and principles in urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 47-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.854680

Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. (2000). By design. Urban design in the planning system: towards better practice. London: Crown.

Cooksey, B., & Kikula, I. (2005). When bottom-up meets top-down: the limits of local participation in local government planning in Tanzania. Research on Poverty Alleviation, Special Paper No: 17. Da es Salaam: Kuki na Nyota Publishers.

Egan, J. (2004). The Egan review: skills for sustainable communities. London Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

Farr, D. (2007). Sustainable urbanism: urban design with nature. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Ferreira, F. A. (2016). Are you pleased with your neighborhood? A fuzzy cognitive mapping-based approach for measuring residential neighborhood satisfaction in urban communities. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2015.1121169

Fraser, E. D., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.009

Greed, C., & Roberts, M. (2014). Introducing urban design: interventions and responses. Oxon: Routledge.

Larice, M., & Macdonald, E. (2007). The urban design reader. Oxon: Routledge.

Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think: the design process demystified (4th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

Nase, I., Berry, J., & Adair, A. (2015). Urban design quality and real estate value: in search of a methodological framework. Journal of Urban Design, 20, 563-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1071657

Pissourios, I. (2014). Top-down and bottom-up urban and regional planning: towards a framework for the use of planning standards. European Spatial Research and Policy, 21, 83-99. https://doi.org/10.2478/esrp-2014-0007

Reed, B. (2007). A Living systems approach to design. AIA National Convention May 2007. Theme Keynote Address.

Ritchie, A., & Thomas, R. (2013). Sustainable urban design: an environmental approach. Oxon: Taylor & Francis.

Roberts, M., & Greed, C. (2001). Approaching urban design: the design process. Oxon: Routledge.

Rowley, A. (1998). Private‐property decision makers and the quality of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3, 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724423


Roy, U., & Ganguly, M. (2009, January). Integration of top down & bottom up approach in urban and regional planning: West Bengal experience of draft development plans (DDP) and beyond. 57th National Town and Country Planners Congress. Goa, India.

The Regenis Group. (2011). The Regenesis approach: sustainability and the patterns of place. Ferndale, Washington, USA.

The Regenis Group. (2012). Regenerative development. Ferndale, Washington, USA.

Wall, E., & Waterman, T. (2010). Basics landscape architecture 01: urban design. Lausanne: AVA Publishing.