Share:


Stakeholders’ perceptions of the innovation trends in the Slovak forestry and forest-based sectors

    Erika Loučanová Affiliation
    ; Hubert Paluš Affiliation
    ; Klára Báliková Affiliation
    ; Michal Dzian Affiliation
    ; Nikola Slašťanová Affiliation
    ; Jaroslav Šálka Affiliation

Abstract

Innovations represent the engine of the business and economic. This is particularly relevant to the traditional sectors such as forestry and forest-based industry that are expected to play an important role in the future steps oriented towards meeting the sustainable development goals. The main aim of this study is to analyse the stakeholders’ perceptions of the innovation trends in the forestry and forest-based sectors by using a Q-methodology. This research addressed three groups of respondents in Slovakia, whose task was to subjectively assess innovative trends in the forestry and forest-based sectors. Based on the results it can be concluded that the innovation trend in the forestry and forest-based sectors will be oriented towards the technological progress focused on the increasing efficiency of wood processing and increasing the usability of waste material as well as the trend of increasing development of innovations in the forest recreation services.

Keyword : innovation, innovation system, innovation trends, forestry and forest-based sectors, Q-methodology, stakeholders

How to Cite
Loučanová, E., Paluš, H. ., Báliková, K. ., Dzian, M. ., Slašťanová, N. ., & Šálka, J. . (2020). Stakeholders’ perceptions of the innovation trends in the Slovak forestry and forest-based sectors. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(6), 1610-1627. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.13503
Published in Issue
Oct 1, 2020
Abstract Views
190
PDF Downloads
112
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Andersen, R. H., Schulze, J. L., & Seppel, K. (2018). Pinning down democracy: A Q-method study of lived democracy. Polity, 50(1), 4–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/695417

Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205

Bošanský, B., & Fulková, E. (2009). Q-metóda: Čo to je a ako na to? http://www.paidagogos.net/issues/2009/1/1/article.php

Bucar, B., Glas, M., & Hisrich, R. D. (2003). Ethics and entrepreneurs: An international comparative study. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00083-0

Cirigliano, M. M. (2013). Musical mnemonics in health science: A first look. Medical Teacher, 35(3), e1020–e1026. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.733042

Dasgupta, P. (2005). Q-Methodology for mapping stakeholder perceptions in participatory forest management (Annex B3 of the Final Technical Report of project R8280). Delhi.

de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7

Dean, R. (2019). Control or influence? Conflict or solidarity? Understanding diversity in preferences for public participation in social policy decision making. Social Policy & Administration, 53(1), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12445

Dobšinská, Z., Sarvašová, Z., & Šálka, J. (2010). Changes of innovation behaviour in Slovakian forestry. The Annals of the “Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava. Fascicle of the Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, 10(2(12)), 71–80.

Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, organizations and institutions. Pinter Publishers/Casell Academic.

FAO. (2019). The state of the world’s forests 2018 – Forest pathways to sustainable development. Rome.

Fazekašová, M. (2006). Podniková kultúra vo vybraných podnikateľských subjektoch PPoK (Autoreferát dizertačnej práce). Nitra.

Haarich, S. (2017). Bioeconomy development in EU regions: Mapping of EU Member States’ / regions’ research and innovation plans & strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) on Bioeconomy (Final Report). European Commission, Brussels.

Hansen, E., Juslin, H., & Knowles, C. (2007). Innovativeness in the global forest products industry: Exploring new insights. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(8), 1324–1335. https://doi.org/10.1139/X06-323

Hansen, E. N. (2010). The role of innovation in the forest products industry. Journal of Forestry, 108, 348–353.

Hansen, E., Nybakk, E., & Panwar, R. (2014). Innovation insights from North American forest sector research: A literature review. Forests, 5(6), 1341–1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5061341

Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P., & Stepherd, D. (1998). Entrepreneurship. McGraw-Hill.

Hovgaard, A., & Hansen, E. (2004). Innovativeness in the forest products industry. Forest Products Journal, 54(1), 26–33.

Jarský, V. (2014). Inovace v lesním hospodářství – systémový pohled. Powerprint (in Czech).

Jepson, P., & Ladle, R. J. (2015). Nature apps: Waiting for the revolution. Ambio, 44, 827–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0712-2

Kállay, É. (2007). Q methodology: The investigation of meaning systems in different life-conditions through proverbs. Cogniţie, Creier, Comportament, 11(2), 353–369.

Kotler, P. (1995). Marketing – Management. Victoria Publishing (in Slovak).

Kovalčík, M., Sarvašová, Z., Schwarz, M., Moravčík, M., Oravec, M., Lásková, J., & Tutka, J. (2012). Financial and socio-economic impacts of nature conservation on forestry in Slovakia. Journal of Forest Science, 58, 425–435. https://doi.org/10.17221/14/2012-JFS

Kubeczko, K., Rametsteiner, E., & Weiss, G. (2006). The role of sectoral and regional innovation systems in supporting innovations in forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(7), 704–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.011

Kula, E. (2012). Economics of natural resources, the environment and policies. Springer Science & Business Media.

Kumar, N., Belhumeur, P. N., Biswas, A., Jacobs, D. W., Kress, W. J., Lopez, I. C., & Soares, J. V. (2012). Leafsnap: A computer vision system for automatic plant species identification. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 7573. Computer Vision – ECCV 2012 (pp. 502–516). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_36

Lacko, M., & Šálka, J. (2003). Podnikateľské a inovačné správanie lesných podnikov v SR. In Financovanie 2003 (pp. 67–75). Technical University in Zvolen (in Slovak).

LIDL. (2018). Water for Trees in High Tatras.

Loučanová, E., Paluš, H., & Dzian, M. (2017). A course of innovations in wood processing industry within the forestry-wood chain in Slovakia: A Q methodology study to identify future orientation in the sector. Forests, 8(6), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8060210

Loučanová, E., Parobek, J., & Paluš, H. (2014). Identification of Slovak customers’ requirements for storage furniture based on the KANO model. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae, 56, 109–117.

Ludvig, A., Rogelja, T., Asamer-Handler, M., Weiss, G., Wilding, M., & Zivojinovic, I. (2020). Governance of social innovation in forestry. Sustainability, 12(3), 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031065

Marušáková, Ľ. (2009). Best practices in Slovak forestry communication – Case study. Forestry Journal, 55(4), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.2478/v110114-009-0009-0

Ministry of Agriculture of the SR. (2018). Proposal of the national program for the utilization of wood potential in the Slovak Republic 2018. Slovakia.

Nijnik, M., Nijnik, A., Sarkki, S., Muñoz-Rojas, J., Miller, D., & Kopiy, S. (2018). Is forest related decision-making in European treeline areas socially innovative? A Q-methodology enquiry into the perspectives of international experts. Forest Policy and Economics, 92, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.001

Nybakk, E., Lawrence, A., & Weiss, G. (2015). Innovation in forest management for new forest owner types – A Literature Review. Background Paper of Working Group 2 “New forest management approaches”, COST Action FP1201 “Forest Land Ownership Changes in Europe: Significance for Management and Policy”. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303823188_Innovation_in_Forest_Management_for_New_Forest_Owner_Types_-_A_Literature_Review

Nybakk, E., Crespell, P., Hansen, E., & Lunnan, A. (2009). Antecedents to forest owner innovativeness: An investigation of the non-timber forest products and services sector. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(2), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.040

OECD. (2018). Oslo Manuals. The measurement of scientific and technological activities. European Commission.

Orazio, C., Cordero Montoya, R., Régolini, M., Borges, J., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Barreiro, S., Botequim, B., Marques, S., Sedmák, R., Smreček, R.., Brodrechtová, Y., Brukas, V., Chirici, G., Marchetti, M., Moshammer, R., Biber, P., Corrigan, E., Eriksson, L. O., Favero, M., Galev, E., Hengeveld, G. M., Kavaliauskas, M., Mozgeris, G., Navrátil, R., Nieuwenhuis, M., Paligorov, I., Pettenella, D., Stanislovaitis, A., Tomé, M., Trubins, R., Tuček, J., Vizzarri, M., Wallin, I., Pretzsch, H., & Sallnäs, O. (2017). Decision support tools and strategies to simulate forest landscape evolutions integrating forest owner behaviour: A review from the case studies of the European Project, INTEGRAL. Sustainability, 9(4), 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040599

Paluš, H. (2015). Changes in energy wood supplies in the Slovak Republic. In Wood Processing and Furniture Manufacturing Challenges on the World Market and Wood-Based Energy Goese Global. Proceedings of Scientific Papers (pp. 261–266). WoodEMA. Zagreb.

Paluš, H., Kaputa, V., Parobek, J., Šupín, M., Halaj, D., Šulek, R., & Fodrek, L. (2011). Trh s lesníckymi službami (Technical). Technická univerzita vo Zvolene (in Slovak).

Paluš, H., Loučanová, E., & Kaputa, V. (2015). Kontrakty a manažment rizika inovačného procesu poskytovate’ov lesníckych služieb na Slovensku. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 61, 77–86.

Paluš, H., Mat’ová, H., & Križanová, A. (2014). A survey of awareness of forest certification schemes labels on wood and paper products. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae, 56, 129–138.

Parobek, J., Paluš, H., Kalamárová, M., Loučanová, E., Šupín, M., Križanová, A., & Štofková, K. R. (2016). Energy utilization of renewable resources in the European Union – Cluster analysis approach. BioResources, 11(1), 984–995. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.1.984-995

Parobek, J., Paluš, H., Kaputa, V., & Šupín, M. (2014). Analysis of wood flows in Slovakia. BioResources, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.4.6453-6462

Pätäri, S., Arminen, H., Albareda, L., Puumalainen, K., & Toppinen, A. (2017). Student values and perceptions of corporate social responsibility in the forest industry on the road to a bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics, 85(Part 1), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.009

Perz, J., Ussher, J. M., & Gilbert, E. (2013). Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals. BMC Cancer, 13, 270. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-270

Rametsteiner, E., & Weiss, G. (2006). Innovation and innovation policy in forestry: Linking innovation process with systems models. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(7), 691–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.009

Šálka, J. (2004). Inovačná politika v lesnom hospodárstve SR. Podpora Inovácií a Podnikania v Lesníctve (pp. 32–40). Lesnícky výskumný ústav.

Šálka, J., Longauer, R., & Lacko, M. (2006). The effects of property transformation on forestry entrepreneurship and innovation in the context of Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(7), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.017

Salloch, S., Otte, I. C., Reinacher-Schick, A., & Vollmann, J. (2018). Physician perspectives on the impact of patient preferences and the role of next-of-kin of patients in evidence-based decision-making: A qualitative interview study from oncology. Zeitschrift Für Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualität Im Gesundheitswesen, 131, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2018.02.002

Sarvašová, Z. (2008). Inovácie v rekreačných službách spätých s lesom – prípadová štúdia. In Marketing a Obchod. Národné lesnícke centrum (in Slovak).

Sarvašová, Z., & Kovalčík, M. (2010). Challenges for diversification of activities in private forest sector in Slovakia. In Small scale forestry in a changing world. Slovenian Forestry Institute, Ljubljana.

Sarvašová, Z., & Šálka, J. (2012). Integrácia úžitkov verejnoprospešných funkcií lesov do trhového mechanizmu – Teórie a zahraničné skúsenosti. Vydavateľstvo TU vo Zvolene (in Slovak).

Sarvašová, Z., & Lásková, J. (2009). Kooperácie podporujúce inovácie v rekreačných službách spätých s lesom. In Aktuálne Otázky Ekonomiky Lesného Hospodárstva Slovenskej Republiky. Národné lesnícke centrum (in Slovak).

Sarvašová, Z., Šálka, J., Dobšinská, Z., & Kovalčík, M. (2014). The comparison of innovations in Slovakian forestry between 2002 and 2010-a shift to multifunctionality? South-East European Forestry, 5(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.15177/seefor.14-11

Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J. F., Monforti-Ferrario, F., & Nita, V. (2015). The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts. Environmental Development, 15, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006

Schmolck, P. (2017). PQMethod manual. http://schmolck.org/qmethod/

State enterprise Forests of the Slovak Republic. (2017). Annual report of forests of the Slovak Republic. https://www.lesy.sk/files/forest-2018/annual-report/lesy-sr-vs-2017-en.pdf (in Slovak).

Steelman, T. A., & Maguire, L. A. (1999). Understanding participant perspectives: Q-methodology in national forest management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(3), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199922)18:3<361::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-K

Štěrbová, M., Loučanová, E., Paluš, H., Ivan, Ľ., & Šálka, J. (2016). Innovation strategy in Slovak forest contractor firms – A SWOT analysis. Forests, 7(6), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7060118

Štěrbová, M., & Šálka, J. (2016). Peňažné stimuly k inováciám v sektore lesníckych služieb na Slovensku z Programu rozvoja vidieka. Zprávy Lesnického Výzkumu, 61, 151–157.

Valenta, A. L., & Wigger, U. (1997). Q-methodology. Definition and application in health care informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(6), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1997.0040501

Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., Monfreda, C., Loh, J., Myers, N., Norgaard, R., & Randers, J. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9266–9271. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142033699

Walder, P., & Kantelhardt, J. (2018). The environmental behaviour of farmers – capturing the diversity of perspectives with a Q methodological approach. Ecological Economics, 143, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.018

Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp022oa

Weidenfeld, A. (2018). Tourism diversification and its implications for smart specialisation. Sustainability, 10(2), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020319

Weiss, G., Pettenella, D., Ollonqvist, P., & Slee, B. (Eds.). (2011). Innovation in forestry: Territorial and value chain relationships. CABI International. Oxfordshire. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936891.0000

Zaušková, A., Loučanová, E., Sarvašová, Z., & Fodrek, L. (2009). Inovačný governance a lesníctvo. In J. Šálka & Z. Sarvašová (Eds.), Governance v Lesníctve (pp. 156–202). Národné lesnícke centrum (in Slovak).

Zoznam.sk. (2019). Telefónny zoznam. https://telefonny.zoznam.sk/

Živojinović, I., Weiss, G., Wilding, M., Wong, J. L. G., & Ludvig, A. (2020). Experiencing forest products – An innovation trend by rural entrepreneurs. Land Use Policy, 94, 104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104506

Živojinović, I., & Wolfslehner, B. (2015). Perceptions of urban forestry stakeholders about climate change adaptation – A Q-method application in Serbia. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(4), 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.10.007