Share:


Investigation of solutions for interoperability between intermodal transport terminals

Abstract

The poorly developed network and the low level of interconnection between sea and land terminals along the North-South and East-West corridors in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR) have a negative impact and are a major obstacle to the international competitiveness of these corridors. In order to respond to this challenge, three new high-tech intermodal transport centers have been formed in Lithuania along the trans-European (TEN-T). These centers are designated to respond flexibly to the needs of local and international markets, taking advantage of intermodal transport. The main aim of the article is to explore the attitudes and interests of intermodal transport terminal managers, and other decision makers and experts to use the East-West and North-South international corridors as well as their intentions to develop interoperability between terminals. Based on the research, an innovative model of synchronization transport flows between major intermodal terminals have been proposed.


Įvairiarūšio transporto terminalų tarpusavio veiklos sprendimų tyrimas


Santrauka 


Silpnai išplėtotas tinklas ir žemas jūros ir sausumos terminalų tarpusavio sąveikos lygis išilgai Baltijos jūros regiono (BJR) Šiaurės–Pietų ir Rytų–Vakarų transporto koridorių yra didelis kliuvinys siekiant didinti tarptautinį šių transporto koridorių konkurencingumą. Siekiant atsiliepti į šį iššūkį Lietuvoje transeuropinių (TEN-T) Šiaurės–Pietų ir Rytų–Vakarų koridorių kryptimis, yra suformuoti nauji modernių technologijų įvairiarūšio transporto centrai. Šių centrų paskirtis – lankstus reagavimas į vietos ir tarptautinių rinkų poreikius, naudojant įvairiarūšio transporto teikiamus privalumus. Svarbiausias straipsnio tikslas – ištirti įvairiarūšio transporto terminalų valdytojų ir kitų sprendimų priėmėjų bei specialistų požiūrius ir interesus naudotis Rytų–Vakarų bei Šiaurės–Pietų tarptautiniais transporto koridoriais, taip pat jų ketinimus plėtoti tarpusavio kooperavimąsi. Remiantis atliktais tyrimais pasiūlytas inovacinis transporto srautų sinchronizavimo tarp pagrindinių įvairiarūšio transporto terminalų modelis.


Reikšminiai žodžiai: TEN-T koridoriai, įvairiarūšio transporto terminalai, sąveikumas, sinchronizavimas, modeliavimas.

Keyword : TEN-T corridors, intermodal terminals, interoperability, synchronization, modelling

How to Cite
Šakalys, R., & Batarlienė, N. (2020). Investigation of solutions for interoperability between intermodal transport terminals. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis / Science – Future of Lithuania, 12. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2020.11116
Published in Issue
Feb 20, 2020
Abstract Views
132
PDF Downloads
74
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Agbo, A. A., Li, W., Atombo, C., Lodewijks, G., & Zheng, L. (2017). Feasibility study for the introduction of synchromodal freight transportation concept. Cogent Engineering, 4, Article 1305649. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2017.1305649

ALICE. (2015). Corridors, hubs and synchromodality. https://www.etp-logistics.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/W26mayo-kopie.pdf

Behdani, B., Fan, Y., Weigmans, B., & Zuidwijk, R. (2016). Multimodal schedule desing for synchromodal freight transport systems. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 16(3), 424–444.

Blumenfeld, D. E., Burns, L. D., & Daganzo, C. F. (1991). Synchronizing production and transportation schedules. Transportation Research Part B, 25(1), 23−37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(91)90011-7

European Commission. (2017). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM (2017) 283 final). Brussels.

Groothedde, B., Ruijgrok, C., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2005). Towards collaborative, intermodal hub networks: a case study in the fast moving consumers market. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics Transport Rewiev, 41(6), 567−583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.06.005

Hu, Q., Corman, F., & Lodewijks, G. (2015). A review of intermodal rail freight bundling operations. In F. Corman, S. Voß, & R. Negenborn (Eds.), Computational Logistics. ICCL 2015. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24264-4_31

Jespersen, P. H., & Lohse, S. (2012). A green transport corridor within the Øresund region, rethinking transport in the Øresund region: policies, strategies and behaviors (pp. 51−62). Lunds University.

Labanauskas, G. (2010). Lietuvos sausumos transporto infrastruktūros prioritetinės plėtros investicijų pagrįstumo metodinis vertinimas (Daktaro disertacija). Technika.

Mes, M. R. K., & Iacob, M.-E. (2016). Synchromodal transport planing at a logistics services provider. In H. Zijm, M. Klumpp, U. Clausen, & M. Hompel (Eds.), Logistics and supply chain inovation (pp. 23−36). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22288-2_2

Palšaitis, R. (2007). Logistikos vadybos pagrindai. Technika. https://doi.org/10.3846/756-S

Reis, V., Meier, J. F., Pace, G., & Palacin, R. (2013). Rail and multi-modal transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 41(1), 17−30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.10.005

Rodrigue, J.-P. (1999). Globalization and the synchronization of transport terminals. Journal of Transport Geography, 7(4), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00018-6

Roso, V., Woxenius, J., & Lumsden, K. (2009). The dry port consept: connecting container seaport with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(5), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008

Sun, Y., & Lang, M. (2015). Bio-objective optimization for multi-modal transportation routing planning problem based on Pareto optimality. Journal of industrial Engineering and Management, 8(4), 1195–1217. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1562

Sun, Y., Lang, M., & Wang, D. (2015). Optimization models and solution algorithms for freight routing planning problem in the multi-modal transportation networks: a review of the state-of-the-art. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 9, 714– 723. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501509010714

Tavasszy, L. A., Behdani, B., & Konings, R. (2015). Intermodality and synchromodality. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2592888

Wang, X., Meng, Q., & Miao, L. (2016). Delimiting port hinterlands based on intermodal network flows: Model and algorithm. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 88, 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.004

Wichser, J. (2001). Technical and operational developments needed for a better market success of intermodal freight transport. Paper presented at the 1st Swiss Transport Research Conference. Monte Ascona.

Wilmsmeier, G., Monios, J., & Lambert, B. (2011). The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1379–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.010

Xu, Y., Cao, C., Jia, B., & Zhang, G. (2015). Model and algorithm for container allocation problem with random freight demands in synchromodal transportation. Mathematical Problems and Engineering, 2015, Article 986152. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/986152