Effects of switching costs on innovative investment

    Pu-Yan Nie Affiliation
    ; Chan Wang Affiliation
    ; You-Hua Chen Affiliation
    ; Yong-Cong Yang Affiliation


Switching costs and innovation are two major issues in economics. Prior research demonstrates the effects of switching costs on competition, but ignores the influence of switching costs to firm innovation. So the purpose of this study is to reveal the relationships between switching costs and cost-reducing innovation by considering brand loyalty. All our theoretical conclusions are captured by game theory based on a two-stage duopoly model. The conclusions of this study show that under moderate conditions, switching costs improve competition. Strong firms implement lower price when switching costs are present than when they are not present. Second, at the asymmetric equilibrium, lower-efficiency firms with switching costs launch less innovative investments than do those without switching costs, while higher-efficiency firms with switching costs launch more innovation. But under symmetric equilibrium, switching costs have no effect on innovative investment. The novel contributions of this paper are that we find switching costs and loyalty have vertical impacts on firms’ cost-reducing innovation, which extends the theory of switching costs.

Keyword : switching cost, cost-reducing innovation, competition, commitment, game theory

How to Cite
Nie, P.-Y., Wang, C., Chen, Y.-H., & Yang, Y.-C. (2018). Effects of switching costs on innovative investment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(3), 933-949.
Published in Issue
May 18, 2018
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Burnham, T. A., Krels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109-126.

Cabral, l, L. (2009). Small switching costs lead to lower prices. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 449-451.

Capone, G., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2013). Are switching costs always effective in creating firstmover advantage? The moderating role of demand and technological regimes. Long Range Planning, 46, 348-368.

Chen, Y. H., Nie, P. Y., & Wang, X. H. (2015). Asymmetric duopoly competition with innovation spillover and input constraints. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(6), 1124-1139.

Chen, Y. H., Nie, P. Y., & Huang, J. B. (2017). Duopoly innovation with monopoly debater. Revista brasileira de gestão de negócios, 19(63), 104-117.

Chen, Y. H., Nie, P. Y., & Wen, X. W. (2015b). Analysis of innovation based on financial structure. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 631-640.

Chen, Y. H., Wen, X. W., Wang, B., & Nie, P. Y. (2017). Agricultural pollution and regulation How to subsidize agriculture?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 258-264.

Chen, Y. M. (1997). Paying customers to switching. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6(4), 877-897.

Chen, Y. M., & Sappington, D. (2010). Innovation in vertically related markets. Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(2), 373-401.

Chen, Y. M., & Pearcy, J. (2010). Dynamic pricing: when to entice brand switching and when to reward consumer loyalty. RAND Journal of Economics, 41(4), 674-685.

Doganoglu, T. (2010). Switching costs, experience goods and dynamic price competition”. QME- Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8(2), 167-205.

Dubé, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., & Rossi, P. E. (2009). Do switching costs make markets less competitive?, Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 435-445.

Fang, L. H., Lerner, J., & Wu, C. (2017). Intellectual property rights protection, ownership, and innovation: Evidence from China. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(7), 2446-2477.

Farrell, J., & Klemperer, P. (2007). Chapter 31 Coordination and Lock-Ii: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 3, 1967-2072.

Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985). Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1), 70-83.

Fischer, J. H., & Ross, J. M. (2014). Timing the start of material substitution projects: Creating switching options under volatile material prices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 567-583.

Haj-Salem, N., & Chebat, J. C. (2014). The double-edged sword: The positive and negative effects of switching costs on customer exit and revenge. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1106-1113. Retrieved from .

Jabarnejad, M., & Valenzuela, J. (2016). Optimal investment plan for dynamic thermal rating using benders decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3), 917-929.

Klemperer, P. (1987). The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. Rand Journal of Economics, 18(1), 138-150.

Klemperer, P. (1995). Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Review of Economic Studies, 62(4), 515-539.

Morita, H., & Waldman, M. (2010). Competition, monopoly maintenance and consumer switching cost. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(1), 230-255.

Nie, P. Y. (2014). Effects of capacity constraints on mixed duopoly. Journal of Economics, 112(3), 283-294.

Nie, P. Y. (2018. Comparing horizontal mergers under Cournot with Bertrand competitions. Australian Economic Papers, 57(1), 12-37.

Nie, P. Y., & Chen, Y. H. (2012). Duopoly competitions with capacity constrained input. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 1715-1721.

Nie, P. Y., Wang, C., Chen, Z. Y., & Chen, Y. H. (2018). A theoretic analysis of key person insurance. Economic Modelling, to appear.

Nie, P. Y., Yang, Y. C., Chen, Y. H., & Wang, Z. H. (2016). How to subsidize energy efficiency under duopoly efficiently?. Applied Energy, 175, 31-39.

Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2018). Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Science, to appear.

Sacco, D., & Schmutzler, A. (2011). Is there a U-shaped relation between competition and investment. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(1), 65-73.

Shen, N., & Su, J. (2015). A comparison of different contract forms for consumers with switching costs and changed preferences. Economic Modelling, 50, 19-26.

Viard, B. (2007). Do switching costs make markets more or less competitive? The case of 800-number portability. RAND Journal of Economics, 38(1), 146-163.

Vives, X. (2008). Innovation and competitive pressure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 56(3), 419-469.

Wang, C., Nie, P. Y., Peng, D. H., & Li, Z. H. (2017). Green insurance subsidy for promoting clean production innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 111-117.

Wang, R. Q., & Wen, Q. (1998). Strategic invasion in markets with switching costs, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7(4), 521-549.

Yang, Y. C., Nie, P. Y., Liu, H. T., & Shen, M. H. (2018). On the welfare effects of subsidy game for renewable energy investment: toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Renewable Energy, 121, 420-428.

Yang, Y. C., & Nie, P. Y. (2015). R&D subsidies under asymmetric Cournot competition. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 28(1), 830-842.