Influence of exploitation conditions on anti-skid properties of tyres


Tyre-to-road adhesion plays an important role when taking into account transmission of forces between tyres and road surface. It consequently influences vehicle safety. Moreover, it plays a significant role for modelling vehicle motion, which is often applied in the development of automotive active safety systems and in traffic accidents reconstruction. Furthermore, tyre-to-road adhesion properties are dependent on many factors. One of the factors is the type of tyre – summer or winter. This is the reason why it is justified to study the anti-slip properties of summer and winter tyres. This paper shows the method of measuring tyre-to-road adhesion coefficient. It is based on a skid resistance tester SRT-4 that consists of a special dynamometer trailer, towing vehicle and test-measuring equipment. It was designed to be applied in civil/road engineering and further developed. As a result, the SRT-4 system automatically obtains adhesion characteristics, such as the graph of tyre-to-road adhesion coefficient as a function of wheel slip ratio and velocity characteristics of lock-up adhesion coefficient. Results of the study present the above mentioned characteristics for different types of tyres (summer, winter) in different exploitation conditions. Differences between presented characteristics caused by tyre type and conditions of exploitation are shown. For example, for winter tyres we noticed that the peak value of adhesion coefficient was attained for higher values of slip ratio as compared with summer tyres.

Keyword : tyre-to-road adhesion, skid resistance tester, traffic safety, accident reconstruction, active safety systems, tyre properties, tyre wet grip index

How to Cite
Pokorski, J., Sar, H., & Reński, A. (2019). Influence of exploitation conditions on anti-skid properties of tyres. Transport, 34(4), 415-424.
Published in Issue
Jun 14, 2019
Abstract Views
PDF Downloads
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Başlamışlı, S. Ç. 2014. Development of rational tyre models for vehicle dynamics control design and combined vehicle state/parameter estimation, International Journal of Vehicle Design 65(2/3): 144–175.

Besdo, D.; Heimann, B.; Klüppel, M.; Kröger, M.; Wriggers, P.; Nackenhorst, U. 2010. Elastomere Friction: Theory, Experiment and Simulation. Springer.

Choi, J. H.; Cho, J. R.; Woo, J. S.; Kim, K. W. 2012. Numerical investigation of snow traction characteristics of 3-D patterned tire, Journal of Terramechanics 49(2): 81–93.

Deng, Z.; Qi, Z. T.; Dong, Z.; He, P.; Han, C.; Ren, S. 2013. A road surface identification method for a four in-wheel-motor drive electric vehicle, International Journal of Biomechatronics and Biomedical Robotics 2(2/3/4): 87–92.

Dugoff, H.; Fancher, P. S.; Segel, L. 1970. An analysis of tire traction properties and their influence on vehicle dynamic performance, SAE Technical Paper 700377.

EC. 2009. Regulation (EC) No 1222/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the Labelling of Tyres with Respect to Fuel Efficiency and Other Essential Parameters. Available from Internet:

Ella, S.; Formagne, P.-Y.; Koutsos, V.; Blackford; J. R. 2013. Investigation of rubber friction on snow for tyres, Tribology International 59: 292–301.

Enisz, K.; Szalay, I.; Kohlrusz, G.; Fodor, D. 2015. Tyre–road friction coefficient estimation based on the discrete-time extended Kalman filter, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 229(9): 1158–1168.

Farroni, F. 2016. T.R.I.C.K. – tire/road interaction characterization & knowledge – a tool for the evaluation of tire and vehicle performances in outdoor test sessions, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 72–73: 808–831.

Hac, A.; Bodie, M. O. 2002. Improvements in vehicle handling through integrated control of chassis systems, International Journal of Vehicle Autonomous Systems 1(1): 83–110.

Han, I. 2017. Modelling the tyre forces for a simulation analysis of a vehicle accident reconstruction, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 231(1): 16–26.

Heinrich, G.; Klüppel, M. 2008. Rubber friction, tread deformation and tire traction, Wear 265(7–8): 1052–1060.

Higgins, D. D.; Marmo, B. A.; Jeffree, C. E.; Koutsos, V.; Blackford, J. R. 2008. Morphology of ice wear from rubber–ice friction tests and its dependence on temperature and sliding velocity, Wear 265(5–6): 634–644.

Klempau, F. 2001. Development of a friction prediction system, in 2nd International Colloquium on Vehicle Tyre Road Interaction, 23 February 2001, Florence, Italy, 1–17.

Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guan, X. 2012. Estimation of tyre–road friction coefficient, International Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing 7(3): 285–302.

Makowski, M.; Knap, L. 2014. Reduction of wheel force variations with magnetorheological devices, Journal of Vibration and Control 20(10): 1552–1564.

Nam, K.; Fujimoto, H.; Hori, Y. 2015. Design of an adaptive sliding mode controller for robust yaw stabilisation of in-wheel-motor-driven electric vehicles, International Journal of Vehicle Design 67(1): 98–113.

Pacejka, H. 2012. Tire and Vehicle Dynamics. Butterworth-Heinemann. 672 p.

Parczewski, K.; Wnęk, H. 2015. The tyre characteristics of the physical model used to investigate the lateral stability of a vehicle, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 229(10): 1419–1426.

Patel, N.; Edwards, C.; Spurgeon, S. K. 2008. Tyre–road friction estimation: a comparative study, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 222(12): 2337–2351.

Persson, B. N. J. 1998. On the theory of rubber friction, Surface Science 401(3): 445–454.

Pinnington, R. J. 2009. Rubber friction on rough and smooth surfaces, Wear 267(9–10): 1653–1664.

Pokorski, J.; Reński, A.; Sar, H. 2012. Investigation of adhesion characteristics of different tyre types in different weather conditions, Journal of KONES: Powertrain and Transport 19(3): 363–369.

Pokorski, J.; Reński, A.; Sar, H. 2015. System for investigation of friction properties of the road surface, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 10(2): 126–131.

Radó, Z. 1994. A Study of Road Surface Texture and Its Relationship to Friction. PhD Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, US.

Singh, K. B.; Taheri, S. 2015. Estimation of tire–road friction coefficient and its application in chassis control systems, Systems Science & Control Engineering 3(1): 39–61.

Sjahdanulirwan, M. 1993. An analytical model for the prediction of tyre-road friction under braking and cornering, Interna-tional Journal of Vehicle Design 14(1): 78–99.

Skouvaklis, G.; Blackford, J. R.; Koutsos, V. 2012. Friction of rubber on ice: A new machine, influence of rubber properties and sliding parameters, Tribology International 49: 44–52.

Wambold, J. C.; Antle, C.; E.; Henry, J. J.; Radó, Z. 1995. International PIARC Experiment to Compare and Harmonize Texture and Skid Resistance Measurement. Permanent International Association of Road Congresses (PIARC). 423 p.

Will, A. B.; Zak, S. H. 2000. Antilock brake system modelling and fuzzy control, International Journal of Vehicle Design 24(1): 1–18.

Woodward, D.; Friel, S. 2017. Predicting the wear of high friction surfacing aggregate, Coatings 7(5): 71.

Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, B. 2016. Coordinative traction control of vehicles based on identification of the tyre–road friction coefficient, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 230(12): 1585–1604.