Share:


Local determinants of driving behaviours: Installation Theory interventions to reduce fuel consumption among truck drivers in Colombia

    Paulius Yamin Affiliation
    ; Saadi Lahlou Affiliation
    ; Santiago Ortega Affiliation
    ; Viktor Skrickij Affiliation

Abstract

Eco-driving has been linked to considerable reductions in negative externalities and costs for transportation companies, employees and communities (including fuel consumption, safety and emission benefits). Nevertheless, some of the biggest challenges to its implementation are related to promoting behavioural change among drivers. This paper presents the results of three behavioural field interventions that were successful to improve fuel efficiency in heavy freight transportation. The interventions brought further improvement even though the target company already had strong training, incentive, control and feedback procedures in place. The Installation Theory framework and the Subjective Evidence-Based Ethnography (SEBE) technique were used to systematically analyse determinants of driving behaviours, and to design cost-effective behavioural interventions based on social norms. The effects of three interventions were then tested using a pre-test post-test control group design among 211 drivers of the company. Results show significant decreases in average monthly fuel consumption of up to 4% in month 1 and up to 4.5% in month 3. Our findings show (with certain qualifications), that the Installation Theory framework and social norm interventions can be a cost-effective method to improve fuel efficiency in road freight transport companies, even when strong training, incentive, control and feedback procedures are already in place.


First published online 20 January 2021

Keyword : eco-driving, fuel consumption, driving behaviour, installation theory, subjective evidence-based ethnography, social norms, behavioural interventions, field experiment

How to Cite
Yamin, P., Lahlou, S., Ortega, S., & Skrickij, V. (2020). Local determinants of driving behaviours: Installation Theory interventions to reduce fuel consumption among truck drivers in Colombia. Transport, 35(6), 616-634. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2020.14195
Published in Issue
Dec 31, 2020
Abstract Views
272
PDF Downloads
163
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Af Wahlberg, A. E. 2007. Long-term effects of training in economical driving: fuel consumption, accidents, driver acceleration behavior and technical feedback, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37(4): 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2006.12.003

Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall. 278 p.

Barkenbus, J. N. 2010. Eco-driving: an overlooked climate change initiative, Energy Policy 38(2): 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.021

Basarić, V. B.; Jambrović, M.; Miličić, M. B.; Savković, T. M.; Basarić, Đ. M.; Bogdanović, V. Z. 2017. Positive effects of ecodriving in public transport: a case study of the City Novi Sad, Thermal Science 21(1): 683–692. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI150219160B

Bergquist, M.; Nilsson, A.; Schultz, W. P. 2019. A meta-analysis of field-experiments using social norms to promote proenvironmental behaviors, Global Environmental Change 59: 101941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101941

Bicchieri, C. 2017. Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. Oxford University Press. 264 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190622046.001.0001

Bristow, A. L.; Tight, M.; Pridmore, A.; May, A. D. 2008. Developing pathways to low carbon land-based passenger transport in Great Britain by 2050, Energy Policy 36(9): 3427–3435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.029

Coe, R. 2002. It’s the effect size, stupid: what effect size is and why it is important, in BERA Conference 2002: Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, 12–14 September 2002, Exeter, UK. Available from Internet: https://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm

Darnton, A. 2008. Practical Guide: an Overview of Behaviour Change Models and their Uses. GSR Behaviour Change (GSR) Knowledge Review, London, UK. 43 p. Available from Internet: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/498064/Behaviour-change_practical_guide_tcm6-9696.pdf

De Leeuw, A.; Valois, P.; Seixas, R. 2014. Understanding high school students’ attitude, social norm, perceived control and beliefs to develop educational interventions on sustainable development, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 143: 1200–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.160

Dolan, P.; Galizzi, M. M. 2015. Like ripples on a pond: behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy, Journal of Economic Psychology 47: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.003

Farmer, C. M.; Kirley, B. B.; McCartt, A. T. 2010. Effects of invehicle monitoring on the driving behavior of teenagers, Journal of Safety Research 41(1): 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2009.12.002

Franks, B.; Lahlou, S.; Bottin, J. H.; Guelinckx, I.; Boesen-Mariani, S. 2017. Increasing water intake in pre-school children with unhealthy drinking habits: a year-long controlled longitudinal field experiment assessing the impact of information, water affordance, and social regulation, Appetite 116: 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.019

Gerber, A. S.; Green, D. P. 2011. Field experiments and natural experiments, in R. E. Goodin (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. 27 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0050

Gilman, E.; Keskinarkaus, A.; Tamminen, S.; Pirttikangas, S.; Roning, J.; Riekki, J. 2015. Personalised assistance for fuel-efficient driving, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 58: 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.007

Gosnell, G. K.; List, J. A.; Metcalfe, R. 2016. A New Approach to an Age-Old Problem: Solving Externalities by Incenting Workers Directly. NBER Working Paper 22316. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA, US. 83 p. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22316

Harbluk, J. L.; Noy, Y. I.; Trbovich, P. L.; Eizenman, M. 2007. An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: Impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance, Accident Analysis & Prevention 39(2): 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.013

Hari, D.; Brace, C. J.; Vagg, C.; Poxon, J.; Ash, L. 2012. Analysis of a driver behaviour improvement tool to reduce fuel consumption, in 2012 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), 12–16 December 2012, Beijing, China, 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVE.2012.46

Harvey, J.; Thorpe, N.; Fairchild, R. 2013. Attitudes towards and perceptions of eco-driving and the role of feedback systems, Ergonomics 56(3): 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.751460

Henry, D. B. 2008. Changing classroom social settings through attention to norms, in M. Shinn, H. Yoshikawa (Eds.). Toward Positive Youth Development: Transforming Schools and Community Programs, 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327892.003.0003

Henson, J. M.; Pearson, M. R.; Carey, K. B. 2015. Defining and characterizing differences in college alcohol intervention efficacy: a growth mixture modeling application, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 83(2): 370–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038897

Ho, S.-H.; Wong, Y.-D.; Chang, V. W.-C. 2015. What can ecodriving do for sustainable road transport? Perspectives from a city (Singapore) eco-driving programme, Sustainable Cities and Society 14: 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.08.002

Jeffreys, I.; Graves, G.; Roth, M. 2018. Evaluation of eco-driving training for vehicle fuel use and emission reduction: A case study in Australia, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 60: 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.017

John, P.; Sanders, M.; Wang, J. 2014. The Use of Descriptive Norms In Public Administration: a Panacea for Improving Citizen Behaviours? Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Elsevier. 28 p. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2514536

Joo, Y. K.; Lee, J.-E. R. 2014. Can “the voices in the car” persuade drivers to go green?: effects of benefit appeals from in-vehicle voice agents and the role of drivers’ affective states on ecodriving, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17(4): 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0157

Klauer, K. J. 2001. Handbuch Kognitives Training. Hogrefe-Verlag. 620 S. (in German).

Kot, S. 2015. Cost structure in relation to the size of road transport enterprises, Promet – Traffic & Transportation 27(5): 387–394. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v27i5.1687

Krishnamoorthy, B.; Gopalakrishnan, S. 2008. Truck driver’s driving performance assessment, SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2700. https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2700

Lahlou, S. 2009. Social psychology, marketing, and re-installing the world, in 38th Annual Conference of the European Marketing Academy: EMAC 2009, 26–29 May 2009, Nantes, France, 1–6.

Lahlou, S. 2011. How can we capture the subject’s perspective? An evidence-based approach for the social scientist, Social Science Information 50(3–4): 607–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018411411033

Lahlou, S. 2015. Social representations and social construction: the evolutionary perspective of installation theory, in G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, J. Valsiner (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323650.017

Lahlou, S. 2018. Installation Theory: the Societal Construction and Regulation of Behaviour. Cambridge University Press. 512 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480922

Lahlou, S.; Boesen-Mariani, S.; Franks, B.; Guelinckx, I. 2015a. Increasing water intake of children and parents in the family setting: a randomized, controlled intervention using installation theory, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 66: 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381243

Lahlou, S.; Le Bellu, S.; Boesen-Mariani, S. 2015b. Subjective evidence based ethnography: method and applications, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 49(2): 216–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9288-9

Lai, W.-T. 2015. The effects of eco-driving motivation, knowledge and reward intervention on fuel efficiency, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 34: 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.003

Lauper, E.; Moser, S.; Fischer, M.; Matthies, E.; Kaufmann-Hayoz, R. 2015. Psychological predictors of eco-driving: a longitudinal study, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 33: 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.06.005

Legros, S.; Cislaghi, B. 2020. Mapping the Social-Norms Literature: An Overview of Reviews, Perspectives on Psychological Science 15(1): 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619866455

McIlroy, R. C.; Stanton, N. A.; Godwin, L. 2017. Good vibrations: using a haptic accelerator pedal to encourage eco-driving, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 46: 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.002

Miller, D. T.; Prentice, D. A. 2013. Psychological levers of behavior change, in E. Shafir (Ed.). The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cbm.23

Miller, D. T.; Prentice, D. A. 2016. Changing norms to change behavior, Annual Review of Psychology 67: 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013

Mockus, A. 2002. Co-existence as harmonization of law, morality and culture, Prospects 32(1): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019740325436

Paluck, E. L. 2009. What’s in a norm? Sources and processes of norm change, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(3): 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014688

Pampel, S. M.; Jamson, S. L.; Hibberd, D. L.; Barnard, Y. 2015. How I reduce fuel consumption: an experimental study on mental models of eco-driving, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 58: 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.005

Saboohi, Y.; Farzaneh, H. 2009. Model for developing an ecodriving strategy of a passenger vehicle based on the least fuel consumption, Applied Energy 86(10): 1925–1932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.12.017

Sanguinetti, A.; Kurani, K.; Davies, J. 2017. The many reasons your mileage may vary: Toward a unifying typology of ecodriving behaviors, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 52: 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.02.005

Schall, D. L.; Wolf, M.; Mohnen, A. 2016. Do effects of theoretical training and rewards for energy-efficient behavior persist over time and interact? A natural field experiment on ecodriving in a company fleet, Energy Policy 97: 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.008

Schweitzer, L.; Brodrick, C.-J.; Spivey, S. E. 2008. Truck driver environmental and energy attitudes – an exploratory analysis, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 13(3): 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2007.11.001

Siero, S.; Boon, M.; Kok, G.; Siero, F. 1989. Modification of driving behavior in a large transport organization: a field experiment, Journal of Applied Psychology 74(3): 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.417

Sivilevičius, H.; Bražiūnas, J.; Prentkovskis, O. 2017. Technologies and principles of hot recycling and investigation of preheated reclaimed asphalt pavement batching process in an asphalt mixing plant, Applied Sciences 7(11): 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7111104

Sivilevičius, H.; Vansauskas, V. 2013. Research and evaluation of ruts in the asphalt pavement on Lithuanian highways, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19(5): 609–621. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.817481

Stromberg, H. K.; Karlsson, I. C. M. 2013. Comparative effects of eco-driving initiatives aimed at urban bus drivers – results from a field trial, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 22: 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.02.011

Sullman, M. J. M.; Dorn, L.; Niemi, P. 2015. Eco-driving training of professional bus drivers – does it work?, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 58: 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.04.010

Sunstein, C. R. 2016. The council of psychological advisers, Annual Review of Psychology 67: 713–737. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081914-124745

Tankard, M. E.; Paluck, E. L. 2016. Norm perception as a vehicle for social change, Social Issues and Policy Review 10(1): 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022

Thijssen, R.; Hofman, T.; Ham, J. 2014. Ecodriving acceptance: an experimental study on anticipation behavior of truck drivers, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 22: 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.015

Vaezipour, A.; Rakotonirainy, A.; Haworth, N. 2015. Reviewing in-vehicle systems to improve fuel efficiency and road safety, Procedia Manufacturing 3: 3192–3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.869

Vagg, C.; Brace, C.; Hari, D.; Akehurst, S.; Ash, L. 2013. A driver advisory tool to reduce fuel consumption, SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-2087. https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-2087

Walnum, H. J.; Simonsen, M. 2015. Does driving behavior matter? An analysis of fuel consumption data from heavy-duty trucks, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 36: 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.016

WHO. 2011. Health in the Green Economy: Health Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation – Transport Sector. World Health Organization (WHO). 144 p. Available from Internet: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70913

Yamin, P. 2015. Politics (and mime artists) on the street, in S. Fuggle, T. Henri (Eds.). Return to the Street, 135–145.

Yamin, P.; Fei, M.; Lahlou, S.; Levy, S. 2019. Using social norms to change behavior and increase sustainability in the real world: a systematic review of the literature, Sustainability 11(20): 5847. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205847