Share:


On deploying vehicular communication at the developing seaport and related innovation success impediments

    Sanja Bauk Affiliation
    ; Jose Angel Leon Calvo Affiliation
    ; Anke Schmeink Affiliation
    ; Sadia Azam Affiliation
    ; Rudolf Mathar Affiliation

Abstract

The paper concerns the employment of a vehicular communication concept for traffic management and safety purposes in a developing seaport environment. A general scenario considering centralized and ad-hoc networks has been analysed, since the requirements for the safety of seaports are similar in terms of reliability and latency. The main enhancement of the proposed model is a communication-based cooperative scheme for improving the safety of workers and optimizing the management of on-port vehicles. The simulation analyses have been realized over the container terminal of the developing Port of Bar (South-East Adriatic Sea, Montenegro). Considering the fact that it operates in transitional conditions, related innovation success impediments have been taken into consideration, as well.

Keyword : vehicular communication, seaport, safety, innovation, management, cooperative systems, network planning

How to Cite
Bauk, S., Leon Calvo, J. A., Schmeink, A., Azam, S., & Mathar, R. (2019). On deploying vehicular communication at the developing seaport and related innovation success impediments. Transport, 34(1), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.7987
Published in Issue
Feb 6, 2019
Abstract Views
62
PDF Downloads
58
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Acciaro, M.; Vanelslander, T.; Sys, C.; Ferrari, C.; Roumboutsos, A.; Giuliano, G; Lam, J. S. L.; Kapros, S. 2014. Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation, Maritime Policy & Management: The Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research 41(5): 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.932926

Alexander, P; Haley, D.; Grant, A. 2011. Cooperative intelligent transport systems: 5.9-GHz field trials, Proceedings of the IEEE 99(7): 1213–1235. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2105230

Allate, B. M. 2015. Shipping management and logistics innovation: key factors for success, International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration 2(1): 50-55. https://doi.org/10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.21.1005

Arduino, G.; Aronietis, R.; Crozet, Y.; Frouws, K.; Ferrari, C.; Guihéry, L.; Kapros, S.; Kourounioti, I.; Laroche, F.; Lambrou, M.; Lloyd, M.; Polydoropoulou, A.; Roumboutsos, A.; Van de Voorde, E.; Vanelslander, T. 2013. How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation, Research in Transportation Economics 42(1) 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.11.002

Bahnes, N.; Kechar, B.; Haffaf, H. 2016. Cooperation between Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles to enhance container terminal operations, Journal of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems 3(1): 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jides.2016.05.002

Bauk, S.; Calvo, J. A. L.; Mathar, R.; Schmeink, A. 2017a. V2P/I communication for increasing occupational safety at a seaport, in 2017 International Symposium ELMAR, 18–20 September 2017, Zadar, Croatia, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.23919/ELMAR.2017.8124439

Bauk, S.; Calvo, J. A. L.; Schmeink, A.; Mathar, R. 2017b. Enhancing on port safety by vehicular communication approach: port of Bar (Montenegro) case study, in 2017 6th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), 11–15 June 2017, Bar, Montenegro, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MECO.2017.7977231

Bauk, S.; Schmeink, A.; Colomer, J. 2018. An RFID model for improving workers’ safety at the seaport in transitional environment, Transport 33(2): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2016.1233512

Calvo, J. A. L.; Schröder, F.; Xu, X.; Mathar, R. 2015. A validation using measurement data of a radio channel model with geographical information, in 2015 9th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 13–17 April 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–4.

Daniels, M. 2015. VDL towards new generation AGV. VDL Containersystemen. Available from Internet: https://www.vdlautomatedvehicles.com/news

Darbra, R.-M.; Casal, J. 2004. Historical analysis of accidents in seaports, Safety Science 42(2) 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00002-X

Darroch, J.; Miles, M. P. 2010. Sources of innovation, in V. K. Narayanan, G. C. O’Connor (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation Management, 97–103.

De Martino, M.; Errichiello, L.; Marasco, A.; Morvillo, A. 2013. Logistics innovation in Seaports: an inter-organizational perspective, Research in Transportation Business & Management 8: 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.05.001

DfT. 2010a. Port Employment and Accident Rates Survey: 2009/10. Department for Transport (DfT), UK. 5 p. Available from Internet: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/729976/port-employment-and-accident-rates-statistical_release-2009-10.pdf

DfT. 2010b. Transport Statistics Bulletin: Port Employment and Accident Rates 2009/10. Department for Transport (DfT), UK. 104 p. Available from Internet: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/729977/port-employment-and-accident-rates-full-report-2009-10.pdf

Draškovic, M.; Bauk, S.; Streimikiene, D.; Draskovic, V. 2017. Testing the level of alternative institutions as a slowdown factor of economic development: the case of Montenegro, Amfiteatru Economic 19(45): 477–492.

Drucker, P. F. 2006. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Harper Business. 288 p.

Garcia, R.; Calantone, R. 2002. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review, Journal of Product Innovation Management 19(2): 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1

IEEE 802.11p-2010. IEEE Standard for Information Technology – Local and Metropolitan Area Networks – Specific Requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 6: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2010.5514475

Kotler, P. T.; Keller, K. L. 2015. Marketing Management. 15th edition. Pearson. 832 p.

Maritz, A.; Shieh, C. J.; Yeh, S. P. 2014. Innovation and success factors in the construction of green ports, Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology 15(3A): 1255–1263.

Narayanan, V. K.; O’Connor, G. C. 2010. Encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation Management. Wiley. 562 p.

Parola, F.; Maugeri, S. 2013. Origin and taxonomy of conflicts in seaports: towards a research agenda, Research in Transportation Business & Management 8: 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.07.005

Port of Adria. 2018. Port of Adria – Catalogue 2018. Commercial sector (Port of Adria), Bar, Montenegro. 16 p.

Roberts, B.; Gray, M. 2013. Improving pedestrian safety in container ports and terminals, Port Technology 59: 40–42.

Schröder, F.; Reyer, M.; Mathar, R. 2010. Fast radio wave propagation prediction by heterogeneous parallel architectures with incoherent memory, in WFMN09: Wave Propagation and Scattering in Communication, Microwave Systems and Navigation: Conference Proceedings, 25–27 November 2009, Chemnitz, Germany, 89–93.

Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press. 255 p.

Steinbauer, M.; Molisch, A. F.; Bonek, E. 2001. The double-directional radio channel, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 43(4): 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/74.951559

Sundbo, J. 1998. The Theory of Innovation: Entrepreneurs, Technology and Strategy. Edward Elgar Publishing. 232 p.

Taneja, P.; Van Schuylenburg, M.; Vellinga, T. 2012. Ports and innovation, in Two-day International Conference “Key Developments in the Port and Maritime Sector”: WCTRS – Special Interest Group 2, 21–22 May 2012, Antwerp, Belgium, 1–14.

Wang, M.; Daamen, W; Hoogendoorn, S.P.; Van Arem, B. 2014. Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance sys tems. Part II: cooperative sensing and cooperative control, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 40: 290–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.024

Weiß, C. 2011. V2X communication in Europe – from research projects towards standardization and field testing of vehicle communication technology, Computer Networks 55(14): 3103–3119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2011.03.016

Wiesenthal, T.; Condeço-Melhorado, A.; G. Leduc, G. 2015. Innovation in the European transport sector: a review, Transport Policy 42: 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.003

Xu, X.; Reyer, M.; Schröder, F.; Engels, A.; Mathar, R. 2011. A semi-stochastic radio propagation model for wireless MIMO channels, in 2011 8th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems, 6–9 November 2011, Aachen, Germany, 619–623. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWCS.2011.6125429

Yan, G.; Rawat, D. B. 2017. Vehicle-to-vehicle connectivity analysis for vehicular ad-hoc networks, Ad Hoc Networks 58: 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.11.017

Zhou, H.; Xu, S.; Ren, D.; Huang, C.; Zhang, H. 2017. Analysis of event-driven warning message propagation in vehicular ad hoc networks, Ad Hoc Networks 55: 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.09.018